Effect of Multiple Adjoining Habitats on Avifaunal Diversity in an Agriculture-Based Wetland Adjacent to the Hooghly River, West Bengal, India

Open access

Abstract

Sau M., Chakraborty M., Das R. and Mukherjee S. 2018. Effect of multiple adjoining habitats on avifaunal diversity in an agriculture based-wetland adjacent to the Hooghly River, West Bengal, India. Ring 40: 59-92.

This study was conducted on four plots having a cluster of different combinations of forest, wetland, and agricultural land, as well as a single marshland habitat near the river Hooghly. We obtained 17,817 counts for 150 species in 32 days of year-round sampling. The wetland-agricultural land associated with forest had the highest species diversity (132 species, Shannon ̄H 1.63), heterogeneity (Shannon J’ – 0.773), and number of unique species (33 species), and the lowest dominance (Simpson Index 1/D – 39.35), in contrast with the marsh, which had the lowest diversity (41 species, Shannon ̄H – 1.39), highest homogeneity (Shannon J’ – 0.863), and a lack of uniqueness. The plot with secondary forest patches between an agricultural field and human settlements showed the highest species dominance (Simpsons Diversity 1/D – 17.465). Species rarity ranged from 68.2% to 77.6% within the area under study. There were 25 species common to all plots, which formed six distinct groups based on their abundance. Carnivores were found to be the dominant foraging guild throughout the habitats. Thirty-two per cent of the species are migratory, with the families Scolopacidae and Motacillidae predominating. The Jaccard and Sorensen indices reveal the greatest species similarity between the wetlandpisciculture plot and the marshland. These indices together with the hierarchical cluster analysis indicate the uniqueness of the plot of open forest habitat adjoining the wetland, which offers the best living conditions for migratory species. Our study concludes that when a wetland is surrounded by agriculture rather than fisheries, avifaunal diversity increases, whereas forest-associated wetland-farmland maximizes species richness with minimum dominance and hence imparts greater stability to the overall community structure.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aditya G. Pal S. Saha G.K. 2010. An assessment of fish species assemblages in rice fields in West Bengal India: implications for management. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 26 4: 535-539.

  • Ali S. Ripley S. D. 1980. Handbook of the Birds of India and Pakistan. Vol. 1-10. Oxford University Press. New Delhi.

  • Anderson D.L. 2001. Landscape Heterogeneity and Diurnal Raptor Diversity in Honduras: The Role of Indigenous Shifting Cultivation. Biotropica 33 3: 511-519.

  • Baker J. French K. Whelan R. J. 2002. The edge effect and ecotonal species: bird communities across a natural edge in south eastern Australia. Ecology 83 11: 3048-3059.

  • Bassi N. Kumar M.D. Sharma A. Pardha-Saradhi P. 2014. Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent ecosystem benefits threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2: 1-19.

  • BirdLife International. 2018. State of the world’s birds: taking the pulse of the planet. Cambridge UK.

  • Bradford D.F. Franson S.E. Neale A.C. Heggem D.T. Miller G.R. Canterbury G.E. 1998. Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 49 1: 1-22.

  • Brook B.W. Sodhi N.S. Ng P.K. 2003. Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424 6947: 420.

  • Canterbury G.E. Martin T.E. Petit D.R. Petit L.J. Bradford D.F. 2000. Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conservation Biology 14 2: 544-558.

  • Census of West Bengal and Kolkata data. 2011. Directorate of Census Operations in West Bengal Govt of West Bengal India. Source: http://www.census2011.co.in/census/state/west+bengal.htm.

  • chand Gupta R. Kaushik T.K. 2012. Traditional rural wetlands in Haryana state of India are currently confronting multicornered threats leading to extinction sooner than later. Journal of Tropical Life Science 2 2: 32-36.

  • Chatterjee A. Adhikari S. Barik A. Mukhopadhyay S.K. 2013. The mid-winter assemblage and diversity of bird populations at Patlakhawa Protected Forest Coochbehar West Bengal India. Ring 35 1: 31-53.

  • Chester E.T. Robson B.J. 2013. Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: their ecological characteristics and management. Biological Conservation 166: 64-75.

  • Colwell M.A. Dodd S.L. 1995. Waterbird communities and habitat relationships in coastal pastures of northern California. Conservation Biology 9 4: 827-834.

  • Cowardin L.M. Carter V. Golet F.C. LaRoe E.T. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Department of the Interior US Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Cunningham S.A. Attwood S.J. Bawa K.S. Benton T.G. Broadhurst L.M. Didham R.K. McIntyre S. Perfecto I. Samways M.J. Tscharntke T. Vandermeer J. 2013. To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 173: 20-27.

  • Dale S. 2018. Urban bird community composition influenced by size of urban green spaces presence of native forest and urbanization. Urban Ecosystems 21 1: 1-14.

  • DeLuca W.V. Studds C.E. Rockwood L.L. Marra P.P. 2004. Influence of land use on the integrity of marsh bird communities of Chesapeake Bay USA. Wetlands 24 4: 837-847.

  • Den Boer P.J. 1968. Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. Acta biotheoretica 18 1-4: 165-194.

  • Devictor V. Julliard R. Clavel J. Jiguet F. Lee A. Couvet D. 2008. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global ecology and biogeography 17 2: 252-261.

  • Donald P.F. Sanderson F.J. Burfield I.J. Van Bommel F.P. 2006. Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds 1990–2000. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 116 3-4: 189-196.

  • Dudgeon D. 2003. The contribution of scientific information to the conservation and management of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia. In: Aquatic Biodiversity. Dordrecht pp. 295-314.

  • Dunford W. Freemark K. 2005. Matrix matters: effects of surrounding land uses on forest birds near Ottawa Canada. Landscape Ecology 20 5: 497-511.

  • Durán A.P. Duffy J.P. Gaston K.J. 2014. Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 281 1792: 20141529.

  • Elphick C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and seminatural wetland habitats. Conservation biology 14 1: 181-191.

  • Fahrig L. 2013. Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography 40 9: 1649-1663.

  • Fahrig L. Baudry J. Brotons L. Burel F.G. Crist T.O. Fuller R.J. Sirami C. Siriwardena G.M.Martin J.L. 2011. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology letters 142: 101-112.

  • Fasola M. 1997. Rice farming and waterbirds: integrated management in an artificial landscape. Farming and birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its implications for bird conservation pp. 210-235.

  • Findlay C.S. Bourdages J. 2000. Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14 1: 86-94.

  • Fraser L.H. Keddy P.A. (Eds). 2005. The world’s largest wetlands: ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press.

  • Frolking S. Yeluripati J.B. Douglas E. 2006. New district-level maps of rice cropping in India: a foundation for scientific input into policy assessment. Field Crops Research 98 2-3: 164-177.

  • Gaston A.J. 1984. Is habitat destruction in India and Pakistan beginning to affect the status of endemic passerine birds?. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 81 3: 636-641.

  • Gavareski C.A. 1976. Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle Washington. Condor 78 3: 375-382.

  • Goodale E. Kotagama S.W. Raman T.S. Sidhu S. Goodale U. Parker S. Chen J. 2014. The response of birds and mixed-species bird flocks to human-modified landscapes in Sri Lanka and southern India. Forest ecology and management. 329: 384-392.

  • Gregory R. D. Gibbons D.W. Donald P. F. 2004. Bird census and survey techniques. Bird Ecology and Conservation: 17-56

  • Grimmett R. Inskipp C. Inskipp T. 2011. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press and Christopher Helm. London

  • Hanski I. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. Journal of Biogeography 42 5: 989-993.

  • HBW and BirdLife International. 2017. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International digital checklist of the birds of the world. Version 2 Available at: http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/Species/Taxonomy/HBW-BirdLife_Checklist_Version_2.zip [.xls zipped 1 MB].

  • Indian Institute of Technology. 2011. Trends in Agriculture and Agricultural Practices in Ganga Basin: An Overview. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur India report code: 015_GBP_IIT_SE_ANL_01_Ver1_Dec2011

  • IUCN. 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2017-3. Available at www.iucnredlist.org

  • Jullien M. Thiollay J.M. 1996. Effects of rain forest disturbance and fragmentation: comparative changes of the raptor community along natural and human-made gradients in French Guiana. Journal of Biogeography 23 1: 7-25.

  • Kamp J. Urazaliev R. Donald P.F. Hölzel N. 2011. Post-Soviet agricultural change predicts future declines after recent recovery in Eurasian steppe bird populations. Biological conservation 144 11: 2607-2614.

  • Kazmierczak K. 2000. A field guide to the birds of India Sri Lanka Pakistan Nepal Bhutan Bangladesh and the Maldives. Om Book Service. New Delhi

  • Koh L.P. Gardner T. A. 2010. Conservation in human modified landscapes. In: Sodhi N.S. Ehrlich P.R. (Eds). Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press Oxford UK. pp. 236–261

  • Koh L.P. Wilcove D.S. 2008. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation letters 1 2: 60-64

  • KS Gopi S. 2009. Are rice paddies suboptimal breeding habitat for Sarus Cranes in Uttar Pradesh India? Condor 111 4: 611-623.

  • Kumar M.D. Sivamohan M.V.K. Bassi N. 2012. Technology choices and institutions for improving the economic and livelihood benefits from multiple-use tanks in western Odisha. In: Water management food security and sustainable agriculture in developing economies. Routledge. pp. 158-183.

  • Kupfer J.A. Malanson G.P. Franklin S.B. 2006. Not seeing the ocean for the islands: the mediating influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects. Global ecology and bio-geography 15 1: 8-20.

  • Laska M.S. 1997. Structure of Understory Shrub Assemblages in Adjacent Secondary and Old Growth Tropical Wet Forests Costa Rica 1. Biotropica 29 1: 29-37.

  • Law B.S. Dickman C.R. 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity & Conservation 7 3: 323-333.

  • Levins R. Culver D. 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68 6: 1246-1248.

  • Maeda T. 2001. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain central Japan. Ecological research 16 3: 569-585.

  • Mandal J. Shankar Raman T.R. 2016. Shifting agriculture supports more tropical forest birds than oil palm or teak plantations in Mizoram northeast India. Condor 118 2: 345-359.

  • McAleece N. 1997. Biodiversity pro. Available from http://www.sams.ac.uk/research/software/research/software/bdpro.zip.

  • Newbold T. Hudson L.N. Hill S.L. Contu S. Lysenko I. Senior R.A. Börger L. Bennett D.J. Choimes A. Collen B. Day J. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520 7545: 45.

  • Odum E. P. 1958. Fundamentals of ecology. Second edition. Saunders Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

  • Odum E. P. Barrett G. W. 2005. Fundamentals of ecology. Belmont CA pp. 38-41

  • Parasharya B. M. Borad C. K. Mukherjee A. R. 2006. Factors associated with population explosion of granivorous birds in the agricultural landscape of Indian subcontinent. Acta Zoologica Sinica 52 Suppl. 2: 96.

  • Peh K.S.H. Sodhi N.S. De Jong J. Sekercioglu C.H. Yap C.A.M. Lim S.L.H. 2006. Conservation value of degraded habitats for forest birds in southern Peninsular Malaysia. Diversity and Distributions 12 5: 572-581.

  • Perfecto I. Vandermeer J. 2008. Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1134 1:173-200.

  • Pielou E. C.1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of theoretical biology. 13: 131-144.

  • Praveen J. Jayapal R. Pittie A. 2016. A checklist of the birds of India. Indian Birds 11 5-6: 113-170

  • Rahamani A.R. Kasambe R. 2016. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in India: Priority Sites for conservation Revised and updated. Bombay Natural History Society Indian Bird conservation Network Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and BirdLife International U.K pp. 1992+xii

  • Rahmani A.R. Soni R.G. 1997. Avifaunal changes in the Indian Thar desert. Journal of arid environments 36 4: 687-703.

  • Raman T.S. 2006. Effects of habitat structure and adjacent habitats on birds in tropical rainforest fragments and shaded plantations in the Western Ghats India. In: Forest Diversity and Management. Dordrecht pp. 517-547.

  • Ramankutty N. Foley J.A. Olejniczak N.J. 2002. People on the land: Changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 31 3: 251-257.

  • Rasmussen P. C. Anderton J. C. 2012. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley guide. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions. Washington D.C. and Barcelona.

  • Remsen Jr J.V. Parker III T.A. 1983. Contribution of river-created habitats to bird species richness in Amazonia. Biotropica pp.223-231.

  • Sekercioglu C.H. Loarie S.R. OVIEDO BRENES F.E.D.E.R.I.C.O. Ehrlich P.R. Daily G.C. 2007. Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conservation Biology 21 2: 482-494.

  • Shankar Raman T.R. 2003. Assessment of census techniques for interspecific comparisons of tropical rainforest bird densities: a field evaluation in the Western Ghats India. Ibis 145 1: 9-21.

  • Sisk T. D. C. R. Margules. 1993. Habitat edges and restoration: methods for quantifying edge effects and predicting the results of restoration efforts. [in:] Saunders D.A. Hobbs R.J. Ehrlich P.R. (eds). Reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems. New South Wales Australia Nature conservation 3: 45-55

  • Smith A.C. Fahrig L. Francis C.M. 2011. Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount habitat fragmentation and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography 34 1: 103-113.

  • Sodhi N.S. Koh L.P. Brook B.W. Ng P.K. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends in ecology & evolution 19 12: 654-660.

  • Sundar K.G. and Subramanya S. 2010. Bird use of rice fields in the Indian subcontinent. Waterbirds: 44-70.

  • Sundar K.G. Chauhan A.S. Kittur S. Babu S. 2015. Wetland loss and waterbird use of wetlands in Palwal district Haryana India: the role of agriculture urbanization and conversion to fish ponds. Wetlands 35 1: 115-125.

  • Sundar K.G. Kittur S. 2013. Can wetlands maintained for human use also help conserve biodiversity? Landscape-scale patterns of bird use of wetlands in an agricultural landscape in north India. Biological conservation. 168: 49-56.

  • Sutcliffe L.M. Batáry P. Kormann U. Báldi A. Dicks L.V. Herzon I. Kleijn D. Tryjanowski P. Apostolova I. Arlettaz R. Aunins A. 2015. Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Diversity and Distributions 21 6: 722-730.

  • Findlay C.S. Bourdages J. 2000. Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology 14 1: 86-94.

  • Tilman D. Fargione J. Wolff B. D’antonio C. Dobson A. Howarth R. Schindler D. Schlesinger W.H. Simberloff D. Swackhamer D. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292 5515: 281-284

  • Tryjanowski P. Hartel T. Báldi A. Szymañski P. Tobolka M. Herzon I. Goławski A. Konvièka M. Hromada M. Jerzak L. Kujawa K. 2011. Conservation of farmland birds faces different challenges in Western and Central-Eastern Europe. Acta Ornithologica 46 1: 1-12.

  • Turner R.K. Van Den Bergh J.C. Söderqvist T. Barendregt A. Van Der Straaten J. Maltby E.Van Ierland E.C. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological economics 35 1: 7-23.

  • Verma M. Bakshi N. Nair R.P. 2001. Economic valuation of Bhoj Wetland for sustainable use. Unpublished project report for World Bank assistance to Government of India Environmental Management Capacity-Building. Bhopal: Indian Institute of Forest Management 35.

  • Villard M.A. Metzger J.P. 2014. Beyond the fragmentation debate: a conceptual model to predict when habitat conFig.uration really matters. Journal of Applied Ecology 51 2: 309-318.

  • Wright H.L. Lake I.R. Dolman P.M. 2012. Agriculture – a key element for conservation in the developing world. Conservation Letters 5 1: 11-19.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 98 98 8
PDF Downloads 88 88 4