Are “fair” wages quantitatively important for business cycle fluctuations in Bulgaria?

Aleksandar Vasilev 1
  • 1 Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln

Abstract

We introduce “fair” wages in a general-equilibrium model where worker’s effort is unobservable and investigate whether such a mechanism can quantitatively account for the degree of real wage rigidity in the Bulgarian labor markets, as documented in Lozev, Vladova, and Paskaleva (2011) and Paskaleva (2016). In contrast to Danthine and Kurmann (2004), we internalize the effect that past wages have on the current effort level. We calibrate the model to Bulgarian data (1999-2016), and quantify the effect of technological shocks on hours and wages in the theoretical setup. Overall, the calibrated model with “fair” wages performs poorly when it comes to the relative volatilities of labor market variables. This is because aggregate labor market conditions, as proxied by the employment rate and past aggregate wages, turn out not to be quantitatively important for business cycles in Bulgaria.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AKERLOF, G.A., (1982) Labor contracts as partial gift exchange, Quarterly Journal of Economics 97: 543-569. DOI: 10.2307/1885099

  • BEWLEY, T.F., (1998). Why not cut pay?, European Economic Review 42(3-5): 459-490.

  • Bulgarian National Bank, (2017), Bulgarian National Bank Statistics (www.bnb.bg). Accessed on Oct. 21, 2017.

  • CANOVA, F., (2007), Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.

  • COGLEY, T., NASON, J., (1995). Output dynamics in Real-Business-Cycles, American Economic Review 85(3): 492-511.

  • COLLARD, F., de la CROIX, D. (2000), Gift exchange and the business cycle: the fair wage strikes back, Review of Economic Dynamics 3, 166-193. DOI: 10.1006/redy.1999.0075

  • DANTHINE, J. P., KURMANN, A., (2004), Fair wages in a New Keynesian model of the business cycle, Review of Economic Dynamics 7: 107-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2003.07.001

  • DANTHINE, J. P., KURMANN, A., (2007), The Macroeconomic Consequences of Reciprocity in Labor Relations, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109(4): 857-881.DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00518.x

  • DANTHINE, J. P., KURMANN, A., (2010), The Business Cycle Implications of Reciprocity in Labor Relations, Journal of Monetary Economics 57(7): 837-850. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.08.006

  • HANSEN, G. (1985), Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 309-327. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(85)90039-X

  • HODRICK, Robert and Edward PRESCOTT (1980), Post-war US business cycles: An empirical investigation., Unpublished manuscript (Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA).

  • LOZEV, I., Z., VLADOVA, Z., PASKALEVA, D., (2011), Wage-setting behaviour of Bulgarian firms: Evidence from survey data, Discussion Paper 87, Bulgarian National Bank, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  • National Statistical Institute (2017) NSI Statistical Database. Available on-line at www.nsi.bg. Last accessed on Dec. 18, 2017.

  • NELSON, C. R. and C.I. PLOSSER (1982), Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series, Journal of Monetary Economics 10(2): 139-62. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(82)90012-5

  • PASKALEVA, D., (2016), Labour cost and price adjustment practices of Bulgarian firms in the period 2009-13, Discussion Paper 101, Bulgarian National Bank, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  • ROGERSON, R., (1988), Indivisible labor, lotteries and equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics 21: 3-16. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90042-6

  • ROTEMBERG, J., WOODFORD. M., (1996), Real-Business-Cycle Models and the Fore- castable Movements in Output, Hours, and Consumption, American Economic Review, 86: 71-89.

  • SHAPIRO, C., STIGLITZ, J.E., (1984), Equilibrium Unemployment as a worker-discipline de- vice, American Economic Review 74: 433-444.

  • SOLOW, R.M., (1979), Another Possible Source of Wage Rigidity, Journal of Macroeconomics 1: 79-82. DOI: 10.1016/0164-0704(79)90022-3

  • VASILEV, A., (2009), Business cycles in Bulgaria and the Baltic countries: an RBC approach, International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 1(2): 148-170. DOI: 10.1504/IJCEE.2009.029256

  • VASILEV, A., (2015a), Welfare effects of at income tax reform: the case of Bulgaria, Eastern European Economics 53(2): 205-220. DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2015.1033364

  • VASILEV, A., (2015b), Welfare gains from the adoption of proportional taxation in a general- equilibrium model with a grey economy: the case of Bulgaria’s 2008 flat tax reform, Economic Change and Restructuring, 48(2): 169-185.

  • VASILEV, A., (2016), Search and matching frictions and business cycle fluctuations in Bul- garia, Bulgarian Economic Papers BEP 03-2016, Center for Economic Theories and Policies, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  • VASILEV, A., (2017a), Business Cycle Accounting: Bulgaria after the introduction of the currency board arrangement (1999-2014), European Journal of Comparative Economics, 14(2): 197-219.

  • VASILEV, A. (2017b), A Real-Business-Cycle model with efficiency wages and a government sector: the case of Bulgaria, Central European Journal of Economics and Econometrics, 9(4): 359-377.

  • VASILEV, A., (2017c), A Real-Business-Cycle model with reciprocity in labor relations and fiscal policy: the case of Bulgaria, Bulgarian Economics Papers 03-2017, Center for Economic Theories and Policies, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  • VASILEV, A., (2017d), VAT Evasion in Bulgaria: A General-Equilibrium Approach, Review of Economics and Institutions, 8(2): 2-17. DOI: 10.5202/rei.v8i2.243

  • VASILEV, A.Z., (2018), Aggregation with a non-convex labor supply decision, unobservable effort, and incentive (”fair”) wages, Theoretica l and Practical Research in Economic Fields, Volume IX, Issue 2(18): 144-147.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search