Criteria for the optimal financing model of public theatres

Open access


The research is part of a wider research problem, whose aim is to find an optimal financing model for cultural institutions in Poland. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the performance indicators of municipal and regional theatres in the context of accessibility to cultural public services. The study forms a verification of previously distinguished indicators of the effectiveness of cultural institutions with a general direction: how to find an optimal financing model of public dramatic theatres. The current research problem is the accessibility of public dramatic theatres in the absence of criteria for the allocation of statutory subsidies. We hypothesise that the absence of criteria for the allocation of statutory subsidies highly diversifies the accessibility of performing arts organisations. The object of study is public dramatic theatres in Poland in the period 2011–2015. We investigated the indicators having an impact on the level of accessibility of public theatres. The statistical methods used allowed us to identify criteria affecting availability. These criteria are recognized in the literature. In addition, we indicate the level of diversification of accessibility by individual public theatres.

ACCOUNTING ACT (1994), Journal of Laws 1994 No. 121 item 591. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 10 August 2018].

ACT ON ORGANIZING AND RUNNING, (1991), Journal of Laws 1991 No. 114 item 493, Elaborated based on: i.e. form 2012 item 406, form 2014 item 423, form 2015 item 337, 1505. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 1 August 2018].

ALFONSO, A., SCHUKNECHT, L., TANZI, V. (2008). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. Working Paper Series. 861. European Central Bank.

AMANS, P., MAZARS-CHAPELON, A., VILLESÈQUE-DUBUS, F. (2015). Budgeting in institutional complexity: The case of performing arts organizations. Management Accounting Research 27:74-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2015.03.001

ARIDELLI, E., BECICA, J. (2018). Multi-criteria Evaluation of the State of Professional Theatres in the Czech Republic in Terms of Mixed Public Goods Provided to the Citizens. Review of economic perspectives – národohospodářský obzor. 18(2):155–176. DOI: 10.2478/revecp-2018-0009

BAUMOL, W., BOWEN, W. G. (1966). Performing Arts the Economic Dilemma, Twentieth Century Fund, New York.

BUCHANAN, J. M. (1965). An Economic Theory of Clubs, Economica, New Series, 32(125):1-14. DOI: 10.2307/2552442

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world {SEC(2007) 570} [online]. Available at:, [Accessed: 1 December 2018].


FIEDOR, B. (2002). Czaja, S. (eds.). Podstawy ekonomii środowiska i zasobów naturalnych. C.H.Beck. Warszawa.

FIAZOLI, R., FILIPPINI, M.(1997). Cost structure and product Mix of Local Public Theaters. Journal of Cultural Economics. 21:7, New York. DOI: 10.1023/a:1007341613767

GAŁECKA, M., SMOLNY, K. (2017). Economic Efficiency of Cultural Institutions. In Jedlicka, P., Maresova, P., Soukal, I.(eds.) Doubleblind peer reviewed proceedings of the international scientific conference Hradec Economic Days.7(1):226-237.

GAŁECKA, M., SMOLNY, K. (2017a). Financing rules of the activity of cultural institutions in the context of economic efficiency. Institute of Economic Research Working Papers. Toruń. 27:1-12. DOI: 10.12775/eip.2017.027

GAŁECKA, M., SMOLNY, K. (2017b). Stabilność finansowa instytucji kultury na przykładzie wojewódzkich teatrów i instytucji muzycznych. Zarządzanie finansami. 15(2(67):196-213. DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.67.12

HANDBOOK ON CONSTRUCTING COMPOSITE INDICATORS. Methodology and user guide. OECD. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 10 December 2018].

HANSMANN, H. (1986). Nonprofit Enterprise in the Performing Arts. In P. J DiMaggio (Eds.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts. Studies in Mission and Constraint, 22. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: 10.2307/3003560

HEILBRUN, J. (2003). A Handbook of Cultural Economics. Edward Elgar, Northampton, 91-93.

HELLWIG, Z. (1969). Problem optymalnego wyboru predyktant. Przegląd Statystyczny.3-4: 221-238.

HELLWIG, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę kwalifikowanych kadr. Przegląd Statystyczny.4, Warszawa.

ILCZUK, D. (2015). Ekonomika kultury. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN S.A. Warszawa.

KOKOSZKIEWICZ, A., KOLUPA, M., (1997). On the Hellwig method of feasible portfolio construction, International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 3, 376–383. DOI: 10.1007/BF02295215

KOZERA, C., KOZERA, A., (2011). The standard of living of the population and its diversity in the European Union, Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, Vol 4, Iss 22:123-133.

LEWANDOWSKA, K. (2018). Are Polish theatres autonomous? Artistic institutions in a bureaucratic system of culture funding. Policy Studies. 39:1-18. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2017.1376631

ŁUNIEWSKA, M., (2015). Evaluation of Selected Methods of Classification for the Warsaw Stock Exchange, International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 11: 469-481, DOI: 10.1007/s11294-005-6655-9

ŁUNIEWSKA, M., TARCZYŃSKI, W. (2012). Metody wielowymiarowej analizy porównawczej na rynku kapitałowym, WN PWN, Warszawa.

MUSGRAVE, R. A. (1957) Principles of Budget Determination. Federal Expenditure Policy for Economic Growth and Stability: Papers Submitted by Panelist Appearing Before the Subcommitte on Fiscal Policy. US Goverment Printing Office Washington

NOGARE, C. D., BERTACCHINI, E. (2015). Emerging models of public cultural spending: Direct support through production delegation. s. Poetics. 49:5-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.005

NOWAK, P., (2018). Regional Variety on Quality of Life in Poland, Oeconomia Copernicana. 9/3: 381-40. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.019

O’HAGAN, J. NELIGAN, A. (2005). State Subsidies and Repertoire Conventionality in the Non-profit English Theatre Sector: An Econometric Analysis, Journal of Cultural Economics. 29:36-37. DOI: 10.1007/s10824-005-8132-y

PEACOCK, A. T. (1994). Welfare Economics and Public Subsidies to the Arts, Journal of Cultural Economics 18:151. DOI: 10.1007/BF01078938

PIERCE, L.J. (2000). Programmatic Risk-Taking by American Opera Companies, Journal of Cultural Economics 24:49.

PUBLIC FINANCE ACT, (2009). Journal of Laws 2009 No.157. item.1240. [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 20 August 2018].

REISSERT, B. (2006), Public Finance as Drivers and Constraints for Public Sector Reform in Germany. InP. (Eds) Hoffman – Martinot, V., Wollmann, H. State and Local Government Reforms in France and Germany: Divergence and Convergence. VS Verlag fur sozialwissenschaften, Heidelberg. 160-166, 248.

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS regarding the adoption of the “Strategy for the Development of Social Capital 2020” [Online]. Available at: [Accessed: 5 August 2018].

SAMUELSON, P. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4):387-389. DOI: 10.2307/1925895

THORSBY, D., WITHERS, G.A. (1979). The Economics of the Performing Arts, St. Martin’s, New York. 15.

THORSBY, D. (1994). The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics The production. Journal of Economic Literature. 32(1,9), New York.

THROSBY, D. (2001). Economics and Culture, Cambridge University Press, 31.

VON ECKARDT, W. (1982). The Good Life: Creating Human Community Through the Arts, New York: American Council for the Arts.

ZALAŚ, A. (2000). Taksonomiczna analiza przestrzennego zróżnicowania poziomu życia w Polsce w ujęciu dynamicznym. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach, Katowice.37-38.

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 97 97 31
PDF Downloads 88 88 26