R&D Investments, EPO Patent Applications and the Economic Heterogeneity within the EU

Zuzana Potužáková 1  and Jan Öhm 1
  • 1 Department of Marketing and Trade / Department of Economic Statistics, Economic Faculty, Technical University of Liberec, , Liberec, Czech Republic


In addition to internationalization and growing volumes of international trade in goods, the importance of expenditure on research and development (R&D) has grown significantly. National patent protection has become rather insufficient with increased international trade in goods, which has resulted in the importance of the international patent protection. The main aim of the article is to analyse the relation between R&D investment and the number of patent applications filed with the European Patent Office (EPO) after the year 2000, when the EU‘s Lisbon Strategy was launched. The authors have focused primarily on the differences among the EU macro-regions, which are based on the socioeconomic models. Conclusions imply that one percentage point of R&D expenditure generates roughly 100 EPO applications and the findings also show that individual macro-regions have the identical scattered data. However, dispersions in the individual groups of the EU Member States after the year 2000 differ. The EU Member States are starting to vary significantly in the intensity of R&D support also within each macro-region, thus disparities increase within the EU. Therefore, the attitude to GERD is considered to be an important factor contributing to the greater economic disparities within the EU.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALBU, N. (2011). Research and development spending in the EU: 2020 growth strategy and in perspective. WP 08/2011, Berlin: SWP

  • ANDĚL, J. (2007). Statistické metody. Praha: Matfyzpress, ISBN 978-80-7378-003-6

  • ARMEANU, D.S., VINTILA,G. and GHERGINA S.C. (2017). Empirical Study towards the Drivers of Sustainable Economic Growth in EU-28 Countries. Sustainability 10(4), 1-22, DOI: 10.3390/su10010004

  • BILBAO-OSORIO, B. and RODRÍGEZ-POSE, Á. (2004). From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. Growth and Change, 35(4), 434-455, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x

  • CANTWELL J. and IAMMARINO S. (2003). Multinational Corporations and European Regional Systems of Innovation. London: Routledge, ISBN 978-02-03-98671-4

  • DOLVIK, J. E. MARTIN A. (ed.) (2014). European social models from crisis to crisis: employment and inequality in the era of monetary integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-871796-6

  • ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 0-7456-0665-2

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009). Consultation on the future “EU 2020 Strategy”. Brussels: European Commission

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011). Europe 2020: Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the EU, ISBN 978-92-79-17688-3

  • EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (2000). Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000

  • EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (2002). Presidency Conclusions. Barcelona European Council 15 and 16 March 2002

  • EUROPEAN UNION. (2015). Council recommendation 2015/1184 on broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and of the European Union

  • EUROSTAT. (2016). Smarter, greener, more inclusive? Indicators to support the Europe 2020 Strategy. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the EU. ISBN 978-92-79-59147-1

  • EUROSTAT. (2017). Gross domestic expenditure on R&D, [online] Eurostat, 2017, [02-08-2017] available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=t2020_20&plugin=1

  • FALVEY, R. E., ET AL. (2004). Imports, Exports, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth. Economics Letters, 85(3), 209-13, DOI 10.1007/s10290-009-0028-z

  • FUNKE, M. and NIEBUHR, A. (2005). Regional geographic research and developement spillovers: Evidence from West Germany. Regional Studies, 39(1), 143-153, DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000321904

  • GOULD, D. M. and GRUBEN, W. C. (1996). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth, Journal of Development Economics, 48 (2), 323-50, DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(95)00039-9

  • GREENHALGH, CH. and RODGERS, M. (2006). The value of innovation, the interaction of competition, R&D and IP. Research Policy, 35(4), 562-580, DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.002

  • GRILICHES, Z. (ed.) (1984). R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chichago: NBER, ISBN 0-226-30844-7

  • GROSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in a global economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, ISBN 978-02-62-57097-8

  • HIGH LEVEL GROUP. (2004). Facing the challenge. The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the EU. ISBN 92-894-7054-2

  • HELMELS, CH. and ROGERS, M. (2010). Innovation and the survival of the new firms in the UK. Review of Industrial Organization, 36(3), 227-248, DOI: 10.1007/s11151-010-9247-7

  • JAFFE, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firm’s patents, profits and market value, NBER Working Paper 1815, Cambridge: NBER

  • MACLAURIN W. R. (1953) The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67(2), 97-111, DOI: 10.2307/1884150

  • MASKUS, K. (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington: Institute for International Economics, ISBN 978-08-81-32307-8

  • MORGAN K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal, Regional Studies, 31(6), 491-503, DOI: 10.1080/00343409750132289

  • LEE, M. CHOI, M. (2016). Analysis on Time-Lag Effect on R&D Investment in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Korea, Osong Public Health Res Perspect, 6(4) 241-248, DOI: 10.1016/j.phrp.2015.07.001

  • LEDERMAN, D. and MALONEY, W. F. (2003). R&D and development. Policy Research paper 3024, Washington: World Bank

  • LUNDVALL B. A˚. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers, ISBN 1-85567-063-1

  • OECD, EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting the innovation data. Paris: OECD, ISBN 92-64-01308-3

  • OECD. (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook. Paris: OECD, ISBN 978-92-64-26306-2

  • OECD. (2009). Patent Statistics Manual. OECD: Paris, ISBN 978-92-64-05412-7

  • PARK, W. and GINARTE, C. (1997). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(1), 51-61, DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00477.x

  • PLUVIA ZUNIGA, M. and GUELEC, D. (2009). Who licenses out patents and why? Lessons from a business survey, OECD Science, Industry and Technology Paper, 2009/5, Paris: OECD, DOI: 10.1787/224447241101

  • RODRÍGEZ-POSE, A. and CRESCENZI, R. (2008). Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation System and the Genesis of the Regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67, DOI: 10.1080/00343400701654186

  • ROMER, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 80 (5), p. 71-102, ISSN 0176-2680

  • RUSER, A. and ANHEIER, H.K. (2014). The EU’s future role in the global stage. Global Policy,5 (1) p. 58-67, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12146

  • SANDU, S. and CIOCANEL, B. (2014). Impact of R&D and Innovation on high-tech export. Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business, 15 (1) 80-90, DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00450-X

  • SANDTNER, P. G. and BLOCK, J. (2011). The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks, Research Policy, 40(7), 969-985, DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004

  • SAPIR, A. (2005). Globalization and the reform of the european social model, Brussels: Bruegel

  • SCHNEIDER, P. H. (2005). International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study from developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(5),529-547, DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.09.001

  • SOLOW, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of the economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65-94, ISSN 0033-5533

  • SONN J. W. and STORPER M. (2008). The increasing importance of geographical proximity in technological innovation: an analysis of U.S. patent citations, 1975-1997, Environment and Planning A., 40 (6), 1020-1039, DOI: 10.1068/a3930

  • SWAN, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32 (2), 334-361, ISSN 1475-4932

  • THOMPSON, M. A. and RUSHING, F. W. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61-79, ISSN 0304-3878


Journal + Issues