Welfare Implications of Alternative Monetary Policy Rules: A New Keynesian DSGE Model for Turkey

Open access

Abstract

In recent years, there has been extensive research on the conduct of monetary policy in small open economies that are subject to inflation and output fluctuations. Policymakers should decide whether to implement strict inflation targeting or to respond to the changes in output fluctuations while conducting monetary policy rule. This study aims to examine the response of alternative monetary policy rules to Turkish economy by means of a DSGE model that is subject to demand and technology shocks. The New Keynesian model we used is borrowed from Gali (2015) and calibrated for the Turkish economy. Welfare effects of alternative Taylor rules are evaluated under different specifications of central bank loss function. One of the main findings of this paper is that in the case of a technology shock, strict inflation targeting rules provide the minimum welfare loss under all loss function configurations. On the contrary, the losses are weakened if the monetary authority responds to output fluctuations in the presence of a demand shock. Finally, there exists a trade-off between the volatility of output and inflation in case of a technology shock, while the volatility of both variables moves in the same direction in response to a demand shock.

References

  • AKLAN, A. N, and NARGELECEKENLER, M. (2008). Taylor Rule in Practice: Evidence from Turkey. International Advances in Economic Research, Vol.14, No:2, ss:156-166.

  • ADOLFSON, M., LASEEN, S., LINDE, and J., SVENSSON. (2014). Monetary Policy Trade-offs in an Estimated DSGE Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 42, p. 33-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.02.012

  • ALP, H., ELEKDAĞ, S. (2011). The Role of Monetary Policy in Turkey during the Global Financial Crisis. IMF Working Paper, 11/150.

  • BARİ, B., ŞIKLAR, İ. (2016). The Analysis of Monetary Policy in the Inflation Targeting Regime: An Estimated DSGE Model for Turkey. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, p. 47-69.

  • BERUMENT, H., and TAŞÇI, H. (2004). Monetary policy Rules in Practice: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Finance, 9 (2004), pp: 33-38. DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.219

  • BOUDA, M. (2015). The New Keynesian DSGE Model and Alternative Monetary Policy Rules in the Czech Republic. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 1, 2014.

  • BULUT, Ü. (2017). Monetary Policy and Asset Prices in the Period Following the Global Crisis: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Vol.12, pp.13-30.

  • CALVO, G.A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol.12, pp. 383-398. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0

  • CHRISTIANO, J. L., EICHENBAUM, M., and EVANS, C.L. (2005). Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No.1, p.1-45

  • CLARIDA, R. H. (2014). Monetary Policy in Open Economies: Practical Perspectives for Pragmatic Central Bankers, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, Vol. 49. p. 21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.09.036

  • CURDIA, V., and FINOCCHIARO, D. (2013). Monetary Regime Change and Business Cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 37, pp. 756-773. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.12.004

  • ÇEBİ, C. (2012). The Interaction between Monetary and Fiscal Policies in Turkey: An Estimated New Keynesian DSGE Model. Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, p. 1258-1267. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.014

  • GALI, J. (2015) Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework and Its Applications, Second Edition, Princeton University Press.

  • GAMBACORTA, L., and SIGNORETTI, F. M. (2014). Should monetary policy lean against the wind? An analysis based on a DSGE model with banking. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 43, pp. 146-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.01.016

  • GÜNEY, P. O. (2016). Does the Central Bank Directly Respond to Output and Inflation Uncertainties in Turkey? Central Bank Review. Vol. 16, p. 53-57.

  • GÜRKAYNAK, R., KANTUR, Z., TAŞ, M. A., and YILDIRIM-KARAMAN, S. (2015). Monetary Policy in Turkey after Central Bank Independence. İktisat İşletme ve

  • Finans, Vol 30 (356), November 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2014.01.016

  • KARA, H.A (2006). Turkish Experience with Implicit Inflation Targeting. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Working Paper, No: 6/3.

  • ÖZATAY, F. (2011). The New Monetary Policy of the Central Bank: Two Targets-Three Intermediate Targets-Three Tools, Economics, Business, and Finance. Vol. 26, Issue 302, pp. 27-43. DOI: 10.3848/iif.2011.302.2743

  • ÖZÇELEBI, O., YILDIRIM, N. and KANSU, A. (2014). Possible Effects of Domestic and Foreign Factors on Monetary Policy Implementation in Turkey: A DSGE-VAR Approach. Economic Research, Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 590-606. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2014.974339

  • PATRA, M. D., KHUNDRAKPAM, J. K., and GANGADARAN, S. (2017). The Quest for Optimal Monetary Policy Rules in India. Journal of Policy Modelling, Vol. 39, pp. 349-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.01.006

  • PEHLİVANOGLU, F. (2014). The Estimation of Taylor Type Interest Rate Reaction’s Function in the Frame of Optimal Monetary Policy: The Case of Turkey. The Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, pp.116-126.

  • ROTEMBERG, J. J. and WOODFORD M. (1999) The Cyclical Behavior of Prices and Costs. NBER Working Paper, No. 6909.

  • SEKMEN, T. and ŞIKLAR, İ. (2016). Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policies: An Estimated DSGE Model of the Turkey, Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 47-69.

  • SMETS, F. and WOUTERS, R. (2007). Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach. American Economic Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, June 2007, p. 586-606. DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.3.586

  • USLU, Ç.L., and ÖZÇAM, A. (2014). A Modified Taylor Rule for The Central Bank of Turkey (CBRT): 2003-2012. KSÜ, Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 223-245.

  • YÜKSEL, C. (2013). Role of Investment Shocks in Explaining Business Cycles in Turkey. The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Working Paper, No: 13/12.

  • YÜKSEL, E., METİN-ÖZCAN, K. and HATİPOĞLU, O. (2013). A Survey on Time- Varying Parameter Taylor Rule: A Model Modified with Interest Rate Pass-Through. Economic Systems, Vol. 37, pp. 122-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2012.08.002

  • WOODFORD, M. (1999). Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia, NBER Working Paper Series, 7261.

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 40
PDF Downloads 15 15 15