Peer Effects and Youth Smoking in the European Global Youth Tobacco Survey

Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of peer smoking on individual smoking among youths in 10 countries that participated in the European Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS). I control for endogeneity in school selection and unobserved school-level characteristics through the use of school fixed-effects. I use instrumental variables to address the simultaneity in peer and individual behaviours. Identification arises by comparing students in different classes within the same school. On average, an increase in the share of classmates who smoke by 10 percentage points increases the probability that an individual in that class will smoke by 3 to 6.9 percentage points. The results imply that any policy intervention such as anti-smoking messages, smoking bans, or higher cigarette prices will be even more cost-effective because of the social multiplier effect of peers – policies affecting some individuals in a group will generate spillovers to others through the peer effect.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALI M.M. and DWYER D.S. 2009. Estimating peer effects in adolescent smoking behavior: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health45(4) pp.402-408.

  • AKERLOF G.A. 1997. Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society pp.1005-1027.

  • BECKER G.S. and Murphy K.M. 2009. Social economics: Market behavior in a social environment. Harvard University Press.

  • BIFULCO R. Fletcher J.M. and Ross S.L. 2011. The effect of classmate characteristics on post-secondary outcomes: Evidence from the Add Health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy3(1) pp.25-53.

  • BIKHCHANDANI S. HIRSHLEIFER D. and WELCH I. 1992. A theory of fads fashion custom and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of political Economy100(5) pp.992-1026. http://doi.org/10.1086/261849

  • CHEN J. and MILLAR W.J. 1998. Age of smoking initiation: implications for quitting. Health reports-statistics Canada9 pp.39-48.

  • CLARK A.E. and LOHÉAC Y. 2007. “It wasn’t me it was them!” Social influence in risky behavior by adolescents. Journal of health economics26(4) pp.763-784. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.11.005

  • CUTLER D.M. and GLAESER E.L. 2007. Social interactions and smoking (No. w13477). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • FLETCHER J.M. 2010. Social interactions and smoking: Evidence using multiple student cohorts instrumental variables and school fixed effects. Health Economics19(4) pp.466-484. http://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1488

  • GAVIRIA A. and RAPHAEL S. 2001. School-based peer effects and juvenile behavior. The review of economics and statistics83(2) pp.257-268.

  • JHA P. CHALOUPKA F.J. MOORE J. GAJALAKSHMI V. GUPTA P.C. PECK R. ASMA S. and ZATONSKI W. 2006. Disease control priorities in developing countries. Disease control priorities in developing countries.

  • LUNDBORG P. 2006. Having the wrong friends? Peer effects in adolescent substance use. Journal of health economics25(2) pp.214-233. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.02.001

  • MANSKI C.F. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The review of economic studies60(3) pp.531-542.

  • MANSKI C.F. 2000. Economic analysis of social interactions (No. w7580). National bureau of economic research.

  • MCVICAR D. and POLANSKI A. 2014. Peer effects in UK adolescent substance use: Never mind the classmates?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics76(4) pp.589-604. http://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12030

  • MCVICAR D. 2011. Estimates of peer effects in adolescent smoking across twenty six European countries. Social Science & Medicine73(8) pp.1186-1193. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.006

  • PERTOLD F. 2009. Sorting into Secondary Education and Peer Effects in Youth Smoking. Available at: http://cerge-ei.cz/pdf/wp/Wp399.pdf (Accessed: 30th June 2017)

  • POWELL L.M. TAURAS J.A. and ROSS H. 2005. The importance of peer effects cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behavior. Journal of health Economics24(5) pp.950-968.

  • The Tobacco Atlas World Health Organization 2012: http://www.tobaccoatlas.org/

  • World Health Organization 2012. WHO global report on mortality attributable to tobacco. In WHO global report on mortality attributable to tobacco. Available at:. http://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/surveillance/rep_mortality_attributable/en/ (Accessed: 30th June 2017)

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 335 155 13
PDF Downloads 127 86 5