Open access


The complex analysis of the main stages of Ukraine’s agricultural sector development for the independence period has been done in the paper. It was established, that institutional changes in the agricultural sector of economy occurred concerning following institutions: private property, state regulation, pricing, social capital, competition. The peculiarities of land and property private ownership forming as agri-reforms basis have been determined. Post-Soviet institutions destruction caused rapid decrease of economic development and rural population welfare at the first stage of transformations. The main tendencies of agrarian sector functioning under market conditions, providing growth of the agricultural production and export potential of Ukraine have been identified. It was proved, that progressive economic changes did not provide similar results in rural areas development. As a result, the necessity of focusing on humancentric model of rural development was grounded.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ANDRIICHUK V. (2015). Agribusiness challenges: finding answers. Economics of AIC. 5. p. 12-22.

  • ARONSSON T. LÖFGREN K.-G. (2007). Welfare Theory: History and Modern Results. /

  • BORODINA O. (2010). Social innovation in the system of rural development: conceptual approaches. Economy of Ukraine. 9. p. 68-77.

  • BORODINA O. (2012). Ukrainian Model of Agricultural Development and its Socioeconomic Shift. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting.

  • BORODINA O. (ed.) (2015). Rural Development Policy Based on Communities in Ukraine: Scientific Report. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting.

  • BURDEYNYUK B. (2010). Land reform in Ukraine. What teach the achievements and failures. Land Management Journal. 1. p. 16-20.

  • BUSINESS VIEWS (2015). Agribusiness in Ukraine [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 19th September 2016].

  • CALYUZHNA N. (2014). Resource concept of potential interpretation in economic. The problems of economy. 2. p. 108-114.

  • CATYGROBOVA O. (2013). Institutional changes as the basis to overcome the contradictions of innovative development. Investment: Practice and Experience. [Online] 13. p. 32-35 Available from: [Accessed: 24th November 2016].

  • CIAIAN P. at al. (2012). Institutional Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Markets. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

  • COASE R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica. 4 (16). p. 386-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

  • COMMONS J. (1931). Institutional Economics. American Economic Review. 4(21). p. 648-657.

  • DIYESPEROV V. (2010). Earth as the main natural resource and rural areas of the country. Economy AIC. 9. p. 102-109.

  • DOBRIAK D. (2015). The current state of land reform and prospects of land relations development in Ukraine. Land Management Journal. 4. p. 2-4.

  • DUDAR V. (2009). Analysis of competitive level of domestic agri-food production and perspectives of its increasing on world market. Innovative Economy. 4. p. 76-81.

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Export Helpdesk. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 16th February 2016].

  • FEDOROV M.(2011) Land Reform and Development of Land Relations. Economy AIC. 7. p. 55-60.

  • GARBAR V. (2014). Current status and trends of farms. Proceedings of Uman National University of Horticulture. 84. p. 214-221.

  • GEEC V. (2002) The Market Transformation in Ukraine: Achievements Challenges. Kyiv: Lybid.

  • GONCHARUK O. at al. (2000). Social Problems of Collective Farms Reorganization. Kyiv: Institute of sociology.

  • GOVERNMENT PORTAL. The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 8th November 2016].

  • GUBSKYI B. LUKYANENKO D & SIDENKO V (2000). Internationalization of Ukrainian economy. Ukraine Economy. 9. p. 20.

  • HAIDUTSKYI P. (2005). On main principles of reforming the state support system for agriculture and rural areas. Economics of AIC. 11. p. 43-48.

  • HAIDUTSKYI P. et al. (2005). Agrarian Reform in Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economics.

  • LERMAN Z. et al. (2007). Reforming Agricultural Sector in Ukraine. Rome: FAO.

  • LIBANOVA E. at al. (2002). The Policy of the Middle Class. President of Ukraine Proclamation to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv.

  • LOPATINSKY Y. (2006). Transformation of the Agricultural Sector: Institutional Foundations. Chernivtsi: Ruta.

  • LUKA O. (2003). Ukraine on the agri-food products world market. Economics of AIC. 11. p. 116-121.

  • LUPENKO Y. (2015). Present and Future of International Integration of the Ukrainian Agricultural Sector : the Tasks of Agroeconomics Science. Economy AIC. 6. p. 5-10.

  • LUZAN Y. (2002). Reforming of Ukrainian agrarian sector: state and prospects. Economics of AIC. 4. p. 3-8.

  • MALIK М. and SHPYKULYAK O. (2010). The institutionalization of the agricultural business: transformation and efficiency. Economics of AIC. 7. p. 132-139.

  • MAMCHUR V. (2010). Institutional changes and agricultural policy in regional development. Economics of AIC. 4. p. 158-164.

  • MARTYN A. (2013). The Land Market Regulation in Ukraine. Kyiv.

  • MITCHELL W. (1927). Business Cycles The Problem and Its Setting. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Inc.

  • MOGYLNYI O. (2005). The Regulation of the Agrarian Sphere. Uzhgorod: IBA.

  • MOGYLNYI O. (2013) Institutional features of rural unemployment in the context of the urgent tasks of state employment policy. Labor Economics and Employment Issues. 3. p. 5-10.

  • NIBULON. 2014/15 Marketing Year: the Results! [Online] Available from: html [Accessed: 6th February 2016].

  • NORTH D. (1990). Institutions Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press

  • OSTASHKO T. (2000). What peasants think about the agrarian reform: case study. Rural Reformer. 6(38). p. 4-6.

  • OSTASHKO T. (2004). Market Transformation of Agrarian Sector. Kyiv: Fenics.

  • PADALKA S. (2008). Ukrainian village's 1990-2000: tendencies of socio-economic changes. Ukrainian Historical Journal. 5. p. 169-184.

  • PORTER M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press. 557 p.

  • PROCOPA I. (2007). Rural areas in Ukraine: research and development regulation. Economics of AIC. 6. p. 50-59.

  • ROSSOKHA V. SHARAPA O. (2016). Export potential of agricultural enterprises. Foreign Trade Economics Finance Law. 4. p. 44-53.

  • SABLUK P. et al. (2005). Agricultural Complex in the System of Ukrainian Foreign Trade. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economics.

  • SABLUK P. (2001). Agricultural Economics and Policy in Ukraine: results of the past and the view to the future. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economics.

  • SHEPOTKO L. et al. (2000). Ukrainian Rural Sector on the Millennium Frontier - T. 1. Kyiv: Institute of Economics.

  • SIKORA O. (2014). Saving and development of village human potential. Agrarian Economics. 7 (1-2). p. 79-86.

  • STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE. (2004). Strategy for Economic and Social Development of Ukraine (2004-2015). Kyiv.

  • STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE. (2016). Agriculture of Ukraine in 2015. [Online] Available from:

  • STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF UKRAINE. (2016). Сooperation between Ukraine and EU countries in 2015. [Online] Available from:

  • UKRAINE'S POPULATION. (2015). Statistics of Ukraine's population. [Online] Available from:

  • USENKO N. (2012). Rural youth: the place and role in the socio-economic relations of independent Ukraine (1991-2000). Journal of Agrarian History. 3. p. 150-157.

  • VEBLEN T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: The Modern Library

  • WILLIAMSON O. (2001). Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms marketing contracting. Kyiv: Artek.

  • WORLD BANK (2004). Using Ukraine's Agricultural Potential: Stimulating Growth in Agriculture and Improve Life on Earth.

  • YAKUBA K. (1999). Demographic Policy in Rural Areas of Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of Agrarian Economics.

  • ZUBEC M. at al. (1999). Social situation of the village: problems and prospects. Accounting in Agriculture. 6. p. 2-8.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 368 194 7
PDF Downloads 291 211 25