Efficiency of Mergers of Mechanical Engineering Companies in the Czech Republic

Open access


This paper presents the research results in the field of the efficiency of mergers and acquisitions in the mechanical engineering industry of the Czech Republic. The aim of this paper is to determine whether mergers taking place in mechanical engineering are successful, or possibly to identify factors which may be deemed as synergies sources. In our research, the success rate of mergers is identified on the basis of the increasing revenues and operating profit. It has been established that out of mergers completed in 2004 - 2011, success has been achieved in approximately half of them. For this reason, we have focused on identifying the factors which may serve as the reasons for such a difference. The selected indicators of the cost-to-revenue ratio and utilization of fixed assets, investments, and net working capital we analysed before and after the mergers in both groups of successful and unsuccessful mergers. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the results. The research results have demonstrated that synergies are not achieved due to the change in the market power of the merged companied but owing to operational efficiency which is reflected in a drop in labour costs and depreciation to revenues ratios and increasing asset utilization.

BEDÁŇOVÁ, I. (2011). Neparametrické testy. Biostatistika [online]. Brno: Veterinární a farmaceutická univerzita Brno [cit. 2016-05-18]. Available at: http://cit.vfu.cz/statpotr/POTR/Teorie/Predn4/MannWhit.htm.

BREALEY, R. A., S. C. MYERS and F ALLEN. (2008). Principles of corporate finance. 9th ed. [international edition]. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-007-1266-758.

BROUTHERS, K. D., P. VAN HASTENBURG and J. VAN DEN VEN. (1998). If most mergers fail why are they so popular? Long Range Planning. 31(3), 347-353. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80002-2

DAVIES, M. B. (2007). Doing a successful research project: using qualitative or quantitative methods. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, xiv, 274 s. : il. ISBN 978-1-4039-9379-3.

DEVOS, E., P.-R. KADAPAKKAM and S. KRISHNAMURTHY. (2009). How Do Mergers Create Value? A Comparison of Taxes, Market Power, and Efficiency Improvements as Explanations for Synergies. Review of Financial Studies. 22(3), 1179-1211. DOI: 10.1177/000765039703600102

EY. (2016). M&A Barometr 2015 Česká republika [online]. In: . [cit. 2016-07-07]. Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/2016-MA-Barometer-CZ-2015/$FILE/MA_Barometer_CR_2016.pdf

FICBAUER, D. and M. REŽŇÁKOVÁ. (2014). Holding Company and Its Performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 62(2), 329-337. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462020329

GRIFFIN, J. J. and J. F. MAHON. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business. 36(1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1177/000765039703600102

HARFORD, J. (2005). What drives merger waves? Journal of Financial Economics. 77(3), 529-560. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.004.

CHATTERJEE, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal. 7(2), 119-139. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250070203

KISLINGEROVÁ, E. (2007). Manažerské finance. 2. přeprac. a rozš. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 745 s. Beckova edice ekonomie. ISBN 978-80-7179-903-0.

LOVALLO, D. and D. KAHNEMAN. (2003). Delusions of success. How optimism undermines executives' decisions. Harvard business review. 81(7), 8. ISSN 0017-8012.

MAŘÍK, M. (2011). Metody oceňování podniku: proces ocenění - základní metody a postupy. 3. upr. a rozš. vyd. Praha: Ekopress, 494 s. ISBN 978-80-86929-67-5.

MELLEN, Ch. M. and F. C. EVENS. (2010). Valuation for M&A: building value in private companies. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 383 s. ISBN 978-0-470-60441-0.

MUKHERJEE, T. K., H. KIYMAZ and H. K. BAKE. (2004). Merger Motives and Target Valuation: A Survey of Evidence from CFOs. Journal of Applied Finance. 14(2), 7-24.

PFEFFER, J. and R. I. SUTTON. (2006). EVIDENCE-BASED MANAGEMENT. Harvard Business Review. 84(1), 9. ISSN 0017-8012.

SEDLÁČEK, J., VALOUCH, P. and A. KONEČNÝ. (2013). Synergic motives and economic success of mergers of Czech companies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 61(7), 2721-2727. DOI: 10.1007/s10693-010-0094-3

SHIM, J. (2011). Mergers & Acquisitions, Diversification and Performance in the U.S. roperty-Liability Insurance Industry. Journal of Financial Services Research. 39(3), 119-144. DOI: 10.1007/s10693-010-0094-3

SORENSEN, D. E. (2000). Characteristics of merging firms. Journal of Economics and Business. 52(5), 423-433. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0148-6195(00)00028-x.

TRAUTWEIN, F. (1990). Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal. 11(4), 283-295. DOI: 10.1057/9781137278074.0011

VYAS, V., K. NARAYANAN and A. RAMANATHAN. (2012). Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Eurosian Journal of Business and Economics. 5(9), 79-102.

WALDMAN, D. A. and M. JAVIDAN. (2009). Alternative forms of charismatic leadership in the integration of mergers and acquisitions. The Leadership Quarterly. 20(2), 130-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.008

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 346 235 16
PDF Downloads 155 126 9