The Evaluation of Recession Magnitudes in EU Countries during the Great Recession 2008–2010

Open access


The aim of this article is to compare 2008-2010 recession magnitudes in individual EU countries. For the comparison the recession magnitude scale was used. The strongest recession during the examined period took place in Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Greece and Ireland, while the weakest recessions in the EU occurred in France, Malta and Cyprus. Poland and Slovakia were the only two EU countries that didn’t fall into a recession, that’s why they were not included in the study. The main findings of the paper are that EU19’s recession was much smaller than both the Great Depression of the 1930s and the recent Great Recession in the USA. Furthermore, with the use of a linear econometric model it was found that recession magnitudes in EU countries were directly proportional to the countries’ GDP per capita in 2008 and growth prior to recessions, while countries’ economic openness was indirectly proportional to recession magnitudes, all the relationships being statistically significant.

Andersen, C. (2009). Latvia Caught in Vicious Economic Downturn. IMF Survey Magazine: Countries and Regions. Available from: [Accessed: 25 September 2011].

Arpaia, A., Curci, C. (2010) EU labour market behaviour during the Great Recession. Econ Papers 405.

Barufaldi, D. (2008) A Review of Past Recessions. Investopedia. Available from: [Accessed 30 September 2011].

Bernanke, B.S. (2001). Essays on the Great Depression. Princeton University Press.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (2010). Available from: [Accessed 30 September 2011].

Buti, M. (ed.). (2009). Economic crisis in Europe: Causes, Consequences and Responses. European Economy 7, Luxembourg.

Communication from the Commission to the European Council - A European Economic Recovery Plan. (2008). Brussels. Available from: [Accessed 4 October 2011].

Eichengreen, B., O´Rourke, K. (2010). What do the new data tell us. VOX 3. Available from: [Accessed 30 September 2011].

Eurostat (2011). Available from: /home/. [Accessed 12 September 2011].

Falk, M., Sinabell, F. (2009). A spatial econometric analysis of the regional growth and volatility in Europe. Empirica 36(2), pp. 193-207 DOI: 10.1007/s10663-008-9078-z

Gaggl, P., Kaniovski, S., Prettner, K., Url, T. (2009). The short and long-run interdependencies between the Eurozone and the USA. Empirica 36(2), pp. 209-227.

Gascon, C.S. (2009). The Current Recession: How Bad Is It? Econ Synopses 4:1-2. Available from: [Accessed: 2 October 2011].

IMF Survey Magazine: Countries and Regions (2010). After Severe Recession, Stabilization in Latvia. Available from: [Accessed 30 September 2011].

Haddad, M, Lim, J. J., Pancaro, C., Saborowski, C. (2013). Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified, Canadian Journal of Economics, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp. 765-790. DOI: 10.1111/caje.12031

Kouretas, G. P., Vlamis, P. (2010). The Greek Crisis: Causes and Implications. Panoeconomicus, 4, pp. 391-404. DOI: 10.2298/PAN1004391K

Krugman, P. (2008). European Crass Warfare. The New York Times. Available from: [Accessed 12 October 2011].

Mazurek, J., Mielcová, E. (2013). The Evaluation of Economic Recession Magnitude: Introduction and Application, Prague Economic Papers 2013(2), pp. 182-205. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.447

Moore, G.H. (1967). What is a Recession? Amer. Stat., 21, pp. 16-19.

Newson, B. (2009). Recession in the EU-29: Length and Depth of the Downturn Varies Across Activities and Countries. Eurostat: Industry, Trade and Services 97. Available from: [Accessed 28 September 2011].

O’Brian, R. M. (2007). A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factor. Quality and Quantity, 41, pp.673-690. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

OECD (2010). 2010 Annual statistics. Available from:

Rémond-Tiedrez, I. (2009). Recession in the EU-27: output measures. Eurostat - Statistics in focus 17/2009.

World Bank (2015). Available from: [Accessed 12 April 2016].

World Bank (2016). Available from: [Accessed 12 April 2016].

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.153
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.351


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 69 69 21
PDF Downloads 20 20 6