The Long-Run Superneutrality of Money Revised: the Extended European Evidence

Open access

Abstract

This article investigates the validity of the money superneutrality concept for the large panel of European economies. While focusing exclusively on endogenous growth theories including the Mundell-Tobin effect, we examine the long-run response of real output to a permanent inflation shock in every studied country using a structural vector autoregressive framework. For the majority of countries in our sample, the longrun superneutrality concept is confirmed since the original increase/decrease in output growth fades in time. We also test the additional hypothesis of whether the group of countries with smaller in-sample inflation mean forms the exception to the long-run money superneutrality. As the result, modern economies might be better described from the viewpoint of Sidrauski.

AHMED, S. (1993). Does Money Affect Output? Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review. July/August, pp. 13-28.

BAE, S.-K., JENSEN, M.J. and MURDOCK, S.G. (2005). Long-run neutrality in a fractionally integrated model. Journal of Macroeconomics. 27, pp. 257-274.

BARRO, R. J. (1995). Inflation and economic growth, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. No. 5326.

BASHAR, O. (2011). On the permanent effect of an aggregate demand shock: Evidence from the G7 countries. Economic modelling. 28(3), pp. 1374-1382. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.013

BLANCHARD, O., and QUAH D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and aggregate supply disturbances. American Economic Review. 79(1), pp. 655-673.

BULLARD, J., and KEATING J. W. (1995). The long-run relationship between inflation and output in postwar economies. Journal of Monetary Economics. 36(1), pp. 477-496. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(95)01227-3

DEL BOCA, A., FRATIANNI, M., SPINELLI, F., and TRECROCI, C. (2010). Wage bargaining and the Phillips curve in Italy. MoFiR working paper. No. 41

ESPINOSA-VEGA, M., and RUSSELL, S. (1998). The Long-Run Real Effects of Monetary Policy: Keynesian Predictions from a Neoclassical Model. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper 98-6.

FAMA, E.F. (1975). Short Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation. American Economic Review. 65(1), pp. 269-282.

FARIA, J.R. (2001). Habit formation in a monetary growth model. Economic Letters. 73, pp. 51-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00464-5

FISHER, M., and SEATER, J. (1993). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review. 83(1), pp. 402-415.

FRIEDMAN, M. (1948). A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability. American Economic Review. 38(3), pp. 245-264.

FRIEDMAN, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58, pp. 1-17.

HASLAG, J. H. (1997). Output, Growth, Welfare, and Inflation: A Survey. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review. 1997, pp. 11-21.

IVANOV, V., and KILIAN, L. (2001) A Practitioner's Guide to Lag-Order Selection for Vector Autoregressions. CEPR Discussion Papers. No. 2685.

KANDEL S., OFER A. R., and SARIG O. (1996). Real Interest Rates and Inflation: An Ex-Ante Empirical Analysis. Journal of Finance (LI), pp. 205-225. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05207.x

KEYNES, J.M. (1973). The Collected Writings of J.M. Keynes, In The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Macmillan: London, vol. XIV.

KOTLÁN, I. (2008). Je inflační nejistota prospěšná? Národohospodářský obzor. 8(1-2), pp. 32-49.

KOUSTAS, Z. and SERLETIS, A. (2003). Long-run Phillips-type trade-offs in European Union countries. Economic Modelling. 20(4), pp. 679-701. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-9993(02)00002-0

LUETKEPOHL, H. (2011). Vector autoregressive models. EUI Working Papers. No. 30.

MANCHESTER, J. (1989). How Money Affects Real Output. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 21(1), pp. 16-32 DOI: 10.2307/1992575.

MANKIW, N. G. (1987). The Optimal Collection of Seigniorage. Journal of Monetary Economics. 20(1), pp. 327-341. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(87)90019-5

MISHKIN, F. S. (1992). Is Fisher Effect for Real: A Reexamination of the Relationship Between Inflation and Interest Rates. Journal of Monetary Economics. 30(1), pp. 195-215.

MOTLEY, B. (1998). Growth and inflation: a cross-country study. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review. 1, pp. 15-28.

MUNDELL, R. (1963). Inflation and Real Interest. Journal of Political Economy. 71(3), pp. 280-283. DOI: 10.1086/258771

NELSON, C.R., and SCHWERT, G.W. (1977). Short Term Interest Rates as Predictors of Inflation: On Testing the Hypothesis that the Real Rate of Interest is Constant. American Economic Review. 67(1), pp. 478-486.

NORIEGA, A.E., SORIA, L.M. and VELÁZQUEZ R. (2008). International evidence on stochastic and deterministic monetary neutrality. Economic Modelling. 25, pp. 1261-1275. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2008.04.005

PATINKIN, D. (1987). Neutrality of Money. In The New Palgrawe: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman.

RAPACH, D. E. (2011). International evidence on the long-run superneutrality of money. Working Paper. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.47.9768&rep=rep1&type=pdf

RIGGI, M., and SANTORO, S. (2015). On the Slope and the Persistence of the Italian Phillips Curve. International Journal of Central Banking. 11(2), pp. 157-197.

SIDRAUSKI, M. (1967). Rational Choice and Patterns of Growth in a Monetary Economy. The American Economic Review. 57(2), pp. 534-544.

STOCKMAN, A. C. (1981). Anticipated Inflation and the Capital Stock in a Cash-in- Advance Economy. Journal of Monetary Economics. 8(4), pp. 387-93. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(81)90018-0

TOBIN, J. (1965). Money and Economic Growth. Econometrica. 33(4), pp. 671-684.

WEBER, A. (1994). Testing long-run neutrality: Empirical evidence for G7 countries with special emphasis on Germany. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. 41(1), pp. 67-117. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2231(94)00014-X

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.153
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.351

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 62 62 13
PDF Downloads 14 14 5