Residential Real Estate in Europe: An Exploration of Common Risk Factors

Open access

Abstract

We conduct an exploratory analysis using proxy measures of cross-sectional returns and rental yields in residential real estate. Asset pricing models predict that expected returns should exhibit some sensitivity to one or several fundamental variables that represent a common source of undiversifiable risk. Residential real estate, just like works of art and collectibles, is unique because it represents both an investment vehicle and a durable consumption good. Its pricing and returns should thus reflect both the benefits from portfolio diversification and the effect of supply and demand. In this paper, we investigate the variation in proxy returns and proxy rental yields across 34 major European cities, using a handful of independent variables that should account for the influence of market risk, inflation, and liquidity. In spite of obvious limitations stemming from our sample, we find that the explanatory power of our model is unusually high for a cross-sectional data analysis. Some of our findings concur with other studies showing that in spite of strong segmentation, real estate markets respond to the same structural risk factors. A good portion of our results, however, is hard to explain and interpret. Either we need to take into account cultural differences between Eastern and Western Europe as part of a behavioral approach, or we have to concede that we have been misled by the mismatch in the level of aggregation and the crude estimation of the dependent variables.

References

  • BAKER, M.; WURGLER, J. (2007). Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 129-1. DOI: 10.1257/jep.21.2.129

  • BALL, M.; LIZIERI, C.; & MACGREGOR, B.D. (1998). The Economics of Commercial Property Markets. Routledge, London.

  • BARBERIS, N.; SHLEIFER, A.; & VISHNY, R. (1998). A Model of Investor Sentiment, Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 3, 307-343.

  • BOKHARI, S.; GELTNER, D. (2011) Loss Aversion and Anchoring in Commercial Real Estate Pricing: Empirical Evidence and Price Index Implications. Real Estate Economics 39.4: 635–670. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2011.00308.x

  • BRUNNERMEIER, M. K.; JULLIARD, C.; (2008). Money Illusion and Housing Frenzies. The Review of Financial Studies 21 (1): 135-180. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhm043

  • BURMEISTER, E.; WALL, K. D. (1986). The arbitrage pricing theory and macroeconomic factor measures. Financial Review 21 (1): 1–2.

  • CASE, K. E.; SHILLER, R. J. (1988). The Behavior of Home Prices in Boom and Post Boom Markets, New England Economic Review, November, pp. 29-46.

  • DHAR, R.; GOETZMANN, W. (2005). Institutional perspectives on real estate investing: The role of risk and uncertainty (No. ysm457). Yale School of Management.

  • DUBBEN, N.; SAYCE, S. (1991). Property portfolio management: an introduction (pp. 128-58). London: Routledge.

  • EICHHOLTZ, P.; YÖNDER, E. (2015). CEO Overconfidence, REIT Investment Activity and Performance. Real Estate Economics, 43: 139–162. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12054

  • EPSTEIN, L. G.; SCHNEIDER, M. (2002). Learning Under Ambiguity. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=344920, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.344920

  • EUROSTAT: Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group http://www.statista.com/statistics/246355/home-ownership-rate-in-europe/

  • FARLOW, A. (2004). The UK Housing Market: Bubbles and Buyers. Paper presented at the Credit Suisse First Boston Housing Market Conference.

  • GENESOVE, D.; MAYER, C. (2001). Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), 1233-1260. DOI: 10.1162/003355301753265561

  • HARGREAVES, B. (2005). Exploring the yields on residential investment property. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society (PRRES).

  • HUNGRIA-GARCIA, R., LIND, H., & KARLSSON, B. (2004). Property yields as tools for valuation and analysis. Report No. 52. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

  • KNOLL, K.; SCHULARICK, M.; & STEGER T. (2014). No Price Like Home: Global House Prices, 1870-2012, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10166.

  • MALPEZZI, S. (2003). Hedonic pricing models: A selective and applied review. Section in Housing Economics and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of Duncan Maclennan.

  • MODIGLIANI, F.; BRUMBERG, R. (1954) Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function. In Post-Keynesian Economics. Edited by K. Kurihara. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1954. Pages 338–436.

  • ROLL, R.; ROSS, S. (1980). An empirical investigation of the arbitrage pricing theory. Journal of Finance 35 (5): 1073–1103.

  • ROSS, S. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13 (3): 341–360.

  • SHILLER, R. J. (2008). Historic turning points in real estate. Eastern Economic Journal, 34(1), 1-13. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050001

  • SIRMANS, S. G.; MACPHERSON, D. A.; & ZIETZ, E. N. (2005). The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of real estate literature, 13(1), 1-44.

  • WALDEN, J. (2004). Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 04-08. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=509643

  • WANG, K.; ZHOU, Y.; CHAN, S. H.; & CHAU, K. W. (2000). Over-confidence and cycles in real estate markets: cases in Hong Kong and Asia. International Real Estate Review, 3(1), 93-108.

Review of Economic Perspectives

Národohospodárský obzor; The Journal of Masaryk University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.262
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.516

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 35 35 25
PDF Downloads 11 11 7