The Blundered Strategy of Euro Adoption in the Czech Republic: A ”Pre-crisis“ Retrospective

Open access


The commitment to join the eurozone in 2009-2010 was rejected by Czech Republic in 2006 at a time when signs of the eurozone crisis were not yet apparent. Nor did the prospects of failure to fulfil any of the Maastricht Convergence Criteria have any realistic basis. Real or alleged difficulties in meeting the Maastricht Convergence Criteria and attaining economic alignment with the eurozone did not serve as a mobilization factor for economic policies. Instead, these issues were perceived to offer an objective reason against euro adoption within the declared timeframe. The official stance against the euro was partly based on serious analytical and short-term forecasting errors, if not on deliberate manipulations, including an overemphasised misalignment of the Czech economy with the eurozone.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Analyses of the Czech Republic’s Current Economic Alignment with the Euro Area (2008). Czech National Bank. Retrieved July 6 2012 from

  • Assessment of the Fulfilment of Maastricht Convergence Criteria and the Degree ofEconomic Alignment of the Czech Republic with the Euro Area (2004-2008). Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic and the Czech National Bank. Retrieved March 25 2010 from

  • BORGERSEN T. A. KING R. M. (2011). Reallocation and restructuring: A generalization of the Balassa-Samuelson effect. Structural Change and EconomicDynamics Vol. 22 No. 4 pp. 287- 298. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2011.07.001. ISSN: 0954-349X.

  • Convergence Programmes of the CR (2004-2008). Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • DĚDEK O. (2002). Česká ekonomika a euro (Czech economy and the euro). Politickáekonomie Vol. L No. 3 pp. 361-375.

  • DYBCZAK K. FLEK V. HÁJKOVÁ D. HURNÍK J. (2006). Supply SidePerformance and Structure in the Czech Republic. CNB Working Paper No. 4.

  • ECB (2008). Convergence Report. Frankfurt European Central Bank.

  • EGERT B. (2002). Investigating the Balassa-Samuelson in the Transition: Do We Understand What We See? Economics of Transition Vol. 10 No. 2 pp. 279-309. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0351.00112

  • Eurofound (2007). Fourth European Working Conditions Survey. Dublin European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

  • European Commission (2008). Convergence Report 2008. European Economy 3/2008. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • European Commission (2010). Excessive deficits - Cyprus Denmark and Finland jointhe watchlist. Press release Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • Fiscal Outlook of the Czech Republic (2009): Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • FLEK V. (2010). Euro jako naše budoucí měna: teorie a realita (Euro as our future currency: Theory and reality). In: Lacina Rozmahel et al. (2010 pp. 261-265).

  • FLEK V. ed. (2007): Anatomy of the Czech Labour Market: From Over-employmentto Under-employment in Ten Years? Prague The Karolinum Press.

  • FLEK V. MARKOVÁ L. PODPIERA J. (2003). Sectoral Productivity and Real Exchange Rate Appreciation: Much Ado About Nothing? Czech Journal of Economicsand Finance Vol. 53 Nos. 3-4 pp. 130-153.

  • HÁJEK M. (2008). Ekonomický růst v České republice a nových členských zemích Evropské unie (Economic growth in the Czech Republic and new EU member countries). Politická ekonomie No. 4 pp. 435-448.

  • HELÍSEK M. et al. (2009). Euro v ČR z pohledu ekonomů (Euro in the CR from the economists‘ viewpoint). Plzeň Aleš Čeněk Publishing.

  • Institutional Support for the Adoption of the Euro in the Czech Republic (2005). Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • KOMÁREK L. ČECH Z. HORVÁTH R. (2003). Optimum Currency Area Indices -How Close is the Czech Republic to the Eurozone? CNB Working Paper No. 10.

  • LACINA L. ROZMAHEL P. et al. (2010). Euro: ano/ne? (Euro yes/no?) Prague Alfa.

  • LALINSKY T. (2010). Zkušenosti Slovenska se zavedením eura (Slovakia’s experience with Euro adoption). In: Lacina Rozmahel et al. (2010 pp. 217-265).

  • LEIN S. M. LEON-LEDESMA M. NERLICH C. (2008). How is real convergence driving nominal convergence in the new EU Member States? Journal of InternationalMoney and Finance Vol. 27 No. 2 pp. 227-248. DOI: /10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.12.004

  • MIHAJLEK D. KLAU M. (2003). The Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Central Europe:A Disaggregated Analysis. BIS Working Paper No. 143.

  • MIHAJLEK D. KLAU M. (2008). Catching-up and inflation in transition economies:the Balassa-Samuelson effect revisited. BIS Working Paper No. 270.

  • MUNDELL R. A. (1961). A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American EconomicReview Vol. LI No. 4 pp. 509-517.

  • Ministry of Finance of the CR (2010): Macroeconomic prediction. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • Protocol from the Czech National Bank Board Meeting held on 30 June 2005 (In Czech). Retrieved 6 July 2012 from

  • STARK J. (2008). The adoption of the euro: principles procedures and criteria. Iceland Chamber of Commerce Reykjavik 13. February. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • The Czech Republic’s Euro-area Accession Strategy (2003). Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • The Czech Republic’s Updated Euro-area Accession Strategy (2007). Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

  • WORLD BANK (2009). Doing Business Report. Retrieved 16 June 2011 from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 205 119 2
PDF Downloads 65 50 2