Transparency in the Allocation of Municipal Grants for Sports and Voucher Systems in the Czech Republic

Open access


This paper will assess transparency in the decision-making process in sports grants allocation. In comparison with other parts of the public sector, surprisingly little is known about transparency in the sports sector. An increasing portion of public funds is spent on sport grants; this establishes the necessity for research. Can any positive effects of sports grants be expected to appear without transparency in the decisionmaking process? An examination of the process in reality is crucial for future public resources allocation. Based on the general assumption that NGOs are important actors in economic and political development, we address the Czech Republic at the municipal level.

The main goals of this paper are to assess the transparency of the allocation of public grants for sport organizations on the municipal level in the Czech Republic and to discuss one possible method for improving system transparency and efficiency: vouchers.

We discuss sport vouchers as a possible tool for improving transparency. Vouchers solve the problem of transparency in the decision-making process by transferring the purchasing power to the client. Although using sports vouchers as a tool for allocating public resources is quite rare, there are a few examples of this practice in the Czech Republic. We established two research questions: (1) Do sport clubs perceive the allocation of sport grants at the municipality level as transparent? (2) Do sport clubs consider a voucher system as helpful for the transparency? To answer these questions, we discuss the theory and specific conditions in the Czech Republic; we perform a survey among sport clubs and we examine examples of voucher implementation; and we discuss the general consequences of our results.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BROWN L.D. KALEGAONKAR A. (2002). Support Organizations and the Evolution of the NGO Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. June 2002 31: 231-258DOI:10.1177/0899764002312004

  • Commission of the European Union (2007). White paper on sport. Retrieved June 15 2012 from

  • CROMPTON J.L. (1983). Recreation Vouchers: A Case Study in Administrative Innovation and Citizen Participation. Public Administration Review; Nov/Dec83 Vol. 43 Issue 6 p. 537 10p.

  • FRIEDMAN M. FRIEDMAN R. (1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1982 xi 202 s. ISBN 0226264009.

  • GORTER A. SANDIFORD P. ROJAS Z. SALVETTO M.(2003). Competitive Voucher Schemes for Health Background Paper. Instituto CentroAmericano de la SaludICAS. Retrieved September 20 2012 from

  • JONES C. (2002). Public cost for private gain? Recent and proposed ‘national’ stadium developments in the UK and commonalities with North America. Area 34: 160-170. DOI: 10.1111/1475-4762.00068

  • KANTOR P. (1995). The dependent city revisited: The political economy of urbandevelopment and social policy. Boulder CO: Westview. ISBN 081331903X.

  • MARTIN F. (2001). Should Cities Subsidize Nonprofit International Organizations?: A Case Study and Cost Benefit Analysis. Journal of Urban Affairs vol. 23 pp. 361-373. DOI: 10.1111/0735-2166.00094.

  • NEMEC J. MEDVED J. ŠAGÁT V. (2009) Public finance and sports in Slovakia selected problems and their developments under the economic and financial crisis. In: Teoretické a praktické aspekty VF. VŠE Praha 2009.

  • PEACOCK S. SEGAL L. (2000). Capitation funding in Australia: imperatives and impediments. Health Care Management Science. 3(2):77-88.DOI:10.1023/A:1019037206624

  • STIRTON L. LODGE M. (2001). Transparency Mechanisms: Building Publicness into Public Services. Journal of Law and Society 28: 471-489. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6478.00199. Transparency international (2009). Global corruption barometer. Retrieved September 20 2012 from

  • VALKAMA P. BAILEY S.J. (2001). Vouchers As an Alternative Public Sector Funding System. Public Policy and Administration. Spring 2001 16: 32-58 DOI:10.1177/095207670101600103.

  • WILSON J. (1999). Acknowledging the expertise of patients and their organisations. BMJ Vol 319 pp 771- 774. DOI:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.771

  • WOLMAN H. SPITZLEY D. (1999). The politics of local economic development. In J. Blair & L. Reese (Eds.) Approaches to economic development: Readings fromEconomic Development Quarterly (pp. 225-263). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. DOI: 10.1177/089124249601000201.

  • Hodonín (2012; 1) Zásady přidělování dotací na činnost organizací provozujících veřejněprospěšnou činnost. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Hodonín (2012; 4) Zavedení systému přidělování dotací sportovním oddílům formou grantových poukázek. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Opava(2012; 1) Granty statutární město Opava. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Opava (2012; 2) Granty 2012 - vyhodnocení poukázkového systému. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Opava (2013;1) Zásady poskytování grantů. Retrieved January 15 2013 from

  • Poděbrady (2012; 1) Zásady městka Poděbrady pro poskytování dotací v oblasti volnočasových aktivit. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • BURSA P (2012) Materiál o možné metodě financování základních sportovních aktivit dětí a mládeže ve věkové kategorii 6.-19. Let (Prostějov). Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Hodonín (2012; 2) Hodonínské listy 06/2012. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

  • Hodonín (2012; 3) Dení Hodonín rozdělil sportovní mládež 25mil. Kč. Retrieved September 21 2012 from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 205 110 1
PDF Downloads 87 67 5