Maastricht Criteria of…Divergence?

Open access

Maastricht Criteria of…Divergence?

This article focuses on problematic issues of the Maastricht criteria. The possible effect of attempt to meets the criteria is confronted with its intended purpose. Each criterion is analysed generally by pointing out problematic issues, subsequently, fulfilment by Eurozone members and risks for the Czech Republic, too, are shortly analysed. It is shown that in many cases fulfilling criteria can lead to a different development than was initially intended. The analysis reveals that attempts to meet the criteria can lead to divergence from Eurozone, can cause several economic problems and can bring pain with no gain.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AFXENTIOU P. C. (2000). Convergence the Maastricht Criteria and Their Benefits. Retrieved 14.2.2010 from

  • ARTIS M. J. (2002). Reflection on the Optimal Currency Area (OCA) Criteria in the Light of EMU. Retrieved 11.10.2009 from

  • ARTIS M. J. (2003). The stability and growth pact: fiscal policy in the EMU. In Institutional Legal nad Economic Aspect of the EMU Springer-Verlag Wien ISBN: 3-211-83856-2 s. 101-116

  • BUITER W. H. - GRAFE C. (2002). Anchor Float or Abandon Ship: Exchange Rate Regimes for Accession Countries. Retrieved 15.6.2009 from

  • BUITER W.H. et. al (1993). Excessive Deficits: Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht. Retrieved 24.7.2009 from

  • COAKLEY J (1995). The ERM crisis and Maastricht. Retrieved 03.07.2009 from

  • CORICELLI F. (2002). Exchange rate policy during transition to the European Monetary Union: the option of euroization. Retrieved 23.9.2009 from

  • ČECHOVIČOVÁ S. (2008). Slovensko revalvovalo paritu na EUR/SKK 301260. Retrieved 2.3.2010 from

  • ČNB (2003). Strategie přistoupení České republiky k eurozóně. Retrieved 5.9.2009 from

  • DABROWSKI M (2005). A strategy for EMU Enlargement. Retrieved 5.8.2010 from

  • DARVAS Z. - SZAPARY G. (2008). Euro Area Enlargement and Euro Adoption Strategies. Retrieved 1.8.2009 from

  • DE GRAUWE P. (2003). Economics of monetary union. Oxford University press 5th. ed. ISBN: 0-19-925651-9.

  • DE GRAUWE P. (2009). The politics of Maastricht convergence criteria. Retrieved 3.3.2010 from

  • DELORS J. et. al. (1989). Report on Economic and Monetary Union. Retrieved 2.4.2009 from

  • EC (2010). Konsolidované znění Smlouvy o Evropské unii a Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie. Retrieved 2.5.2010 from

  • ECB (2004). Convergence Report 2004. Retrieved 7.8.2008 from

  • EIJFFINGER S. C. W. - DE HAAN J. (2000). European Monetary and Fiscal Policy. Oxford University Press ISBN: 0-19-844616-0.

  • FRAIT J. (2003). Stability of the Czech Koruna and Convergence towards the Euro. Retrieved 2.6.2010 from

  • HOCHREITER E. - TAVLAS G.S (2004). On the Road Again: An Essay on the Optimal Path to EMU for New Member State. Retrieved 17.7.2009 from

  • JONÁŠ J. (2006). Euro adoption and Maastricht criteria: Rules or discretion?. Retrieved 24.4.2009 from

  • KENEN P. B. - MEADE E.E (2003). EU Accession and the Euro: Close Together or Far Apart? In International Economics Policy Briefs. Retrieved 15.8.2008 from

  • LEVASSEUR S. (2004). Why not euroisation?. Retrieved 12.4.2010 from

  • MANKIW N.G. (1992). Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers ISBN: 0-87901-502-0.

  • PAPAPEMOS L. (2004). Monetary policy and ERM II participation on the path to the euro. Retrieved 18.4.2009 from

  • STAEHR K. (2008). The Maastricht Inflation Criterion and the New EU Members from Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved 20.4.2009 from

  • STOCKMAN A.C. (1999). Choosing an exchange-rate system. Retrieved 9.7.2010 from

  • TAYLOR CH. (1995). EMU 2000? Prospect for European Monetary union Royal Institute for International Affairs ISBN: 1-85567-313-4.

  • TEMPERTON P. (1998). The Euro. 2.vyd. ISBN:0-471-98722-0

  • WINKLER B. (1996): Is Maastricht a good contract? Retrieved 15.6.2009 from

  • WYPLOSZ CH (2006). European Monetary Union: The Dark Sides of a Major Success. Retrieved 3.8.2009 from

  • WYPLOSZ CH. (2000). EMU: Why and How It Might Happen. In International Political Economy Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 0-415-22279-6 s.270-279

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.66

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.21
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.682

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 172 73 0
PDF Downloads 99 63 1