Editorial RES 2/2019

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The official dialogue between Churches and Judaism began between the two world wars, in America and then in England and intensified after the Second World War, reaching most Western European countries. The Eastern Churches felt estranged from this dialogue led by the Western Churches, as they have neither the same approach, nor the same history, nor the same texts of reference. This is why the Orthodox Churches wish to enter the dialogue according to their own approach, relying on their own texts, and recontextualizing the Fathers of Church when they speak about Judaism. By basing the dialogue on the origins of the Church, the Orthodox can justify why certain liturgical texts are obsolete and harmful to the Christian conscience. They will also be able to show how their tradition is close to and in continuity with the Jewish tradition. By doing so, they will be sensitive to the rebuilding of the unique people of God, composed of Christians and Jews according to the Epistle to the Ephesians (2.14)</abstract>

Under What Conditions Would the Orthodox Engage in the Judeo-Christian Dialogue?

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The present article deals with the question of Jewish and Christian-Orthodox dialogue. The author focuses on the ambivalences regarding the relation to Jewish heritage in the liturgical tradition of the Orthodox Church: on the one hand, an un-reflected anti-Judaism of the old byzantine texts (especially in the “Holy and Great Week”), on the other hand a distinctive, hagiographical appreciation of the personalities of the Old Testament. The main challenge remains the development in the Orthodox collective mentality of a new sensibility (in sense of a metanoia) regarding this matter.</abstract>

Jewish Elements in the Tradition of the Orthodox Church. A Contribution to Dialogue

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">After the Shoah, the Catholic-Jewish dialogue has reached considerable intellectual depth, existential honesty, theological advancement and thematic width. The Orthodox Church, however, has hardly started its process of reconciliation. At the heart of the problem is the patristic argumentation on the forsakenness of the Jews, which in the Early Church was organically connected with the truth of Christianity. The patristic authors, however, were largely ignorant of the theological developments of Rabbinic Judaism and thus based their reasoning on mistaken presuppositions. In our times, this is especially clear with the patristic argument that it is perpetually impossible for the Jews to return to rule their Holy Land and Jerusalem.</abstract>

Forsaken or Not? Patristic Argumentation on the Forsakenness of Jews Revisited

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This study focuses on ananalysis of a Jewish genus expression, found in a kontakion with a still doubtful paternity. This expression gave rise to an entire academic discussion, often with contradictory opinions, on the Jewish origin of Romanos. This study contributes to this debate by bringing forth new evidence from both West and East, which can make up a new tool for evaluating the expression itself.</abstract>

Γένος μέν ἐξ ἑβραίων or the Jewish Origin of Romanos the Melodist: From <italic>Overestimations</italic> to <italic>Underestimations</italic> and Finding Bridges between the West and the East

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Concentrating on the Orthodox theology of biblical Israel within the context of fulfillment theology, the argument is that the early Church envisioned itself as the continuation of Israel of the Jewish Bible rather than its replacement. In the author’s view, the current understanding of the distinction between replacement and fulfillment theology, the early Christian theological conception of the Church as Israel, and the ways in which both contemporaneous pagans and Jews viewed the nascent Christian faith support this assertion.</abstract>

Fulfillment in Continuity: The Orthodox Christian Theology of Biblical Israel

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The modern problem of political correctness appeared recently in the Romanian Orthodox Church too and produced different reactions. In this paper I want to discuss the anti-Judaic language that can be encountered in the cult, particularly during the Holy Week, and the solutions to treat these expressions. In the Catholic and Protestant world, the anti-Judaic speech was abandoned,1 so it seems that only the Orthodox churches have kept the texts that might be deemed as offensive for the Jewish people. As we shall observe, the Romanian Orthodox Church offers an interesting case on this issue. Beside the liturgical texts, I will also approach the problem of the accommodation of the biblical texts in the Orthodox Church, since some modern translations have pushed the modification so far.</abstract>

Facing Anti-Judaism in the Romanian Orthodox and the Liturgical Texts?

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This article discusses the role of Byzantine liturgical hymnography within the Jewish-Orthodox Christian dialogue. It seems that problematic anti-Jewish hymns of the Orthodox liturgy were often put forward by the Jewish side, but Orthodox theologians couldn’t offer a satisfactory answer, so that the dialogue itself profoundly suffered. The author of this study argues that liturgical hymnography cannot be a stumbling stone for the dialogue. Bringing new witnesses from several Orthodox theologians, the author underlines the need for a change of perspective. Then, beyond the intrinsic plea for the revision of the anti-Jewish texts, this article actually emphasizes the need to rediscover the Jewishness of the Byzantine liturgy and to approach the hymnography as an exegesis or even Midrash on the biblical texts and motives. As such, the anti-Jewish elements of the liturgy can be considered an impulse to a deeper analysis of Byzantine hymnography, which could be very fruitful for the Jewish-Christian Dialogue.</abstract>

Byzantine Liturgical Hymnography: a Stumbling Stone for the Jewish-Orthodox Christian Dialogue?

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Chapter 4 of the Declaration Nostra Aetate of the Second Vatican Council marks a decisive turn of the relations between Catholics and Jews. Numerous books and articles have tried to discuss the application of this declaration 50 years after its proclamation by Pope Paul VI. on October 28, 1965, to take stock. Nostra Aetate has also been recorded by Orthodox theologians, as some articles attest. After skimming the initiated implementation of this chapter through the ensuing Jewish-Catholic dialogue, we will introduce the Jewish Orthodox. We will distinguish the Judeo-Christian dialogue at the universal level and at the local level. For the Jewish-Catholic dialogue at the local level, we will examine the situation in France and for the Jewish-Orthodox dialogue the situation in Romania. In view of the connection between theology and history, we will mention not only the texts related to this dialogue, but also some events that have favored or slowed it down.</abstract>

Jewish-Christian Dialogue to <italic>Nostra Aetate</italic> in the Catholic and the Orthodox Churches

Research Project on the Jewish-Orthodox Christian Dialogue

L’Ecumenismo delle radici. Cristiani ortodossi ed ebrei: storia dei rapporti, prospettive di dialogo

Receptions of Paul in Early Christianity. The Person of Paul and His Writings Through the Eyes of His Early Interpreters

Pellegrini in Oriente – la Comunità di Taizé e il mondo ortodosso

Apocalypticism and Eschatology in Late Antiquity. Encounters in the Abrahamic Religions, 6th-8th Century

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 15 (2023): Issue 3 (December 2023)

Volume 15 (2023): Issue 2 (August 2023)

Volume 15 (2023): Issue 1 (April 2023)

Volume 14 (2022): Issue 3 (December 2022)

Volume 14 (2022): Issue 2 (September 2022)

Volume 14 (2022): Issue 1 (April 2022)

Volume 13 (2021): Issue 3 (December 2021)

Volume 13 (2021): Issue 2 (August 2021)

Volume 13 (2021): Issue 1 (April 2021)

Volume 12 (2020): Issue 3 (December 2020)

Volume 12 (2020): Issue 2 (August 2020)

Volume 12 (2020): Issue 1 (April 2020)

Volume 11 (2019): Issue 3 (December 2019)

Volume 11 (2019): Issue 2 (August 2019)

Volume 11 (2019): Issue 1 (April 2019)

Volume 10 (2018): Issue 3 (December 2018)

Volume 10 (2018): Issue 2 (August 2018)

Volume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (April 2018)

Volume 9 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 9 (2017): Issue 2 (August 2017)

Volume 9 (2017): Issue 1 (April 2017)

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 3 (December 2016)

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 2 (August 2016)

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)

Volume 7 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)

Volume 7 (2015): Issue 2 (August 2015)

Volume 7 (2015): Issue 1 (April 2015)

Volume 6 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)

Volume 6 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)

Volume 6 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)

Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu

 Publishing House and Owner: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania  The Ecumenical Journal Sibiu (RES) is the academic journal of the Ecumenical Research Centre of Sibiu and serves both national and international ecumenical research, enjoying an international scientific support. The journal is issued three times per year, each issue dealing with a specific topic.  The initiative behind the founding of the RES journal is related to the ecumenical tradition of the city whose name it bears. In 2007, Sibiu was the cultural capital of Europe and home of the Third European Ecumenical Assembly. These events were not accidental, as Transylvania is characterized by a long tradition of tolerance between the various Christian denominations. There is no other region in Europe where Eastern Orthodoxy, Protestantism and Catholicism have shared for centuries the same political and geographical area.  RES aims to reflect international and Romanian theological academic work. The studies, articles and reviews published in it fall within the field of theology, but also include a multidisciplinary perspective: philosophy, history, ethics, social sciences etc. . Born in Sibiu, a symbol of multiethnic coexistence, interreligious tolerance and the confluence of several cultures, our journal aims to become a mouthpiece for research and global and local ecumenical projects. The Romanian and international authors are encouraged to express their own cultural and theological tradition in their continual quest for the dialogue with other cultural traditions and denominations. People shall thus understand that true identity develops only in dialogue, ecumenical dialogue playing a role in self-knowledge: when I meet the other, I understand better who I am myself. Removing false images, ecumenism does not lead to confusion and dilution of identity, but on the contrary - in this passage, through dialogue I go back to myself, changed by this encounter, enriched and strengthened in what I am. Thus, joint responsibility of all Christians shall manifest and strengthen regardless of the area they live in. Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 