PUBLIC REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT IN POST-SOCIALIST COUNTRIES

Open access

Abstract

Public real estate management is a complicated process which depends on many factors. Post-socialist countries are characterized by different ways of public real estate management. This is caused, inter alia, by the specifics of a particular country, its history, politics, the way in which public real estate is interpreted, or the amount of public resources.

The paper presents the classification of the public real estate management systems in terms of the applied procedures. Analyses were made on the basis of the authors’ own studies and indicators proposed by international organizations, such as the World Bank and World Economic Forum. Extremely helpful advice was also obtained from the participants of the international seminar on State and Public Sector Land Management in Transition Countries, which was organized in September 2012 in Budapest by Commission 7 of the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • FAO. 2007. Good governance in land tenure and administration. FAO Land Tenure Studies No 9. Rome.

  • GROSS M. 2010. Questionnaire on Public Real Estate Management Systems. Unpublished materials.

  • GROVER R. 2009. State and public land management: the drivers of change. [In:] Journal of Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives. 2009/1. FAO. s. 58-68.

  • GROVER R. 2012. The Management of State and Public Sector Land in Transition Economies: An Overview.

  • FIG/FAO International Seminar on State and Public Sector Land Management in Transition Countries. Budapest Hungary 20-21 September 2012. www.fig.net. Access: December 2012.

  • KAUFMANN D. KRAAY A. MASTRUZZI M. 2010. The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130.

  • KAUFMANN D. KRAAY A. MASTRUZZI M. 2012. The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp. Access: January 2013.

  • KEITH S. 2012. Land Management in Context: Learning from Experience. FIG/FAO International Seminar on State and Public Sector Land Management in Transition Countries. Budapest Hungary 20-21 September 2012. www.fig.net. Access: December 2012.

  • KOKOT S. GNAT S. 2010. The problem of the efficiency of the economy of communes’ properties. Journal of the Polish Real Estate Scientific Society. Vol. 18 No 2. pp. 29-44.

  • SALUKVADZE J. 2008. Good Governance and Natural Resources Tenure in Eastern Europe and CIS Region.Land Tenure Working Paper 3. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/ak015e/ak015e00.pdf. Access: May 2010.

  • The World Bank and the International Finance Corporation. 2013. Doing Business 2013. Smart Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

  • WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. 2012. The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. Insight Report. SCHWAB K. (ed.). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

  • ZIMMERMANN W. 2007. Good governance in public land management. [In:] Journal of Land Reform Land Settlement and Cooperatives. 2007/2. FAO. s. 30-40.

  • ZIMMERMANN W. 2008. Effective and Transparent Management Public Land Experiences Guiding Principles and Tools for Implementation. FIG/FAO/CNG International Seminar on State and Public Sector Land Management. Verona Italy 9-10.09.2008. www.fig.net. Access: July 2009.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.64

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.825

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 283 164 1
PDF Downloads 131 96 0