Abstract
This article aims to reflect on the main variables that make social robotics efficient in an educational and rehabilitative intervention. Social robotics is based on imitation, and the study is designed for children affected by profound autism, aiming for the development of their social interactions. Existing research, at the national and international levels, shows how children with autism can interact more easily with a robotic companion rather than a human peer, considering its less complex and more predictable actions. This contribution also highlights how using robotic platforms helps in teaching children with autism basic social abilities, imitation, communication and interaction; this encourages them to transfer the learned abilities to human interactions with both adults and peers, through human–robot imitative modelling. The results of a pilot study conducted in a kindergarten school in the Liguria region are presented. The study included applying a robotic system, at first in a dyadic child–robot relation, then in a triadic one that also included another child, with the aim of eliciting social and imitative abilities in a child with profound autism.
References
Ackermann, E. (2002). Ambienti di gioco programmabili: cos’è possibile per un bambino di quattro anni. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 27, 48-55.
Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Bertone, C. & Becchio, C. (2015). Intentions in the Brain: The Unveiling of Mister Hyde. The Neuroscientist 21(2), 126–135. DOI: 10.1177/1073858414533827
Battegazzorre, P. (2009). Bee-bot, fare robotica con un giocattolo programmabile a banalità limitata. Atti Didamatica: Retrieved from http://www.itctannoia.it/Didamatica/2009/lavori/battegazzore.pdf.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, An essay on blindness and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Benitez, A., Cala A. (2007). Market research. Report del progetto IROMEC. www.iromec.org
Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 167-175.
Caci, B. (2004). Laboratorio di robotica: una palestra per la mente. Proceeding del Congresso Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia (AIP), Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale, Sciacca.
Cardaci, M., Caci, B.& D’Amico, A. (2004). La robotica nella riabilitazione di soggetti autistici e con deficit cognitivi. Proceedings of the conference “Tecnologie Digitali e l’Intelligenza Artificiale al Servizio dei Disabili”. Italy: University of Palermo.
Cavallo, A., Koul, A., Ansuini, C., Capozzi, F. & Becchio, C. (2016). Decoding intentions from movement kinematics. Scientific Reports, 6:37036. DOI: 10.1038/srep37036
Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., Trubia, G. & Di Nuovo, A. (2015). Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A pilot study in a clinical setting. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. Kobe. Japan.
Cook, A.M. & Polgar, J.M. (2008). Cook & Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.
Cook, A.M, Adams, K., Volden, J., Harbottle, N. & Harbottle, C. (2011). Using Lego robots to estimate cognitive ability in children who have severe physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6 (4), 338-346.
D’Ambrosio, M. Mirabile, Miglino, O. (2003). Uno studio pilota sull’impiego di giocattoli robotici nella riabilitazione cognitiva. Proceedings of the National Congress of the Italian Psychology Association (AIP). Bari, Italy.
Dautenhahn, K., Werry, I., Ogden, B. & Harwin, W. (2001). Can Social Interaction Skills Be Taught by a Social Agent? The Role of a Robotic Mediator. Autism Therapy, Proceedings CT, The Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (CT2001). University of Warwick, United Kingdom, Springer Verlag.
Dautenhahn, K. & Robins, B. (2007). Learning and Interaction in Children with Autism. VI IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, London, United Kingdom, July 11-13.
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., Walters, M., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, A. & Blow, M. (2009). KASPAR - A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research, to appear. Special Issue on “Humanoid Robots” for Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6, 3–4, 369–397.
De Graaf, M.M.A. & Ben Allouch, S. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Rob. Auton. Syst., 61, 1476–1486
Di Nuovo, S., De La Cruz, V., Conti, D., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, A. (2014). Mental Imagery: rehabilitation through simulation. Life Span and Disability 17, 1, 89-118
Duquette, A., Michaud, F. & Mercier, H. (2008). Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton. Robots, 24, 147–157
Erwin, B. (2001). Creative Projects with LEGO Mindstorms. Boston: Addison-Wesley Pub Co.
Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić, M.J. (2005). Defining Socially Assistive Robotics. Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, 465-468.
Feil-Seifer, D. & Matarić M.J. (2009). Toward Socially Assistive Robotics for Augmenting Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, 54, 201-210.
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. & Dautenhahn K. (2003). A Survey of Socially Iteractive Robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3-4), pp. 143-166.
Garbati, M. (2012). Robotica: sempre più presente nella nostra vita. Retrieved from http://www.torinoscienza.it/dossier/robotica_sempre_piu_presente_nella_nostra_vita_22645.html 30/05/2014.
Goodrich, M., Colton, M., Brinton, B. & Fujiki, M. (2011). A case for lowdose robotics in autism therapy. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human/Robot Interaction, 143-144.
Gouaillier, D., Hugel, V., Blazevic, P., Kilner, C., Monceaux, J., Lafourcade, P., Marnier, B., Serre, J.& Maisonnier, B. (2009). Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2124-2129
Harel I. &Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
IROMEC Consortium, Deliverable 1.0. User needs report, www.iromec.org
Johnson, M.H. & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and Cognitive Development: The case of face recognition. Blackwell: Oxford.
Kim, K.J., Park, E. & Shyam Sundar, S. (2013). Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computer Human Behavior 29, 1799–1806.
Kulk, J. & Welsh, J. (2008). A Low Power Walk for the NAO Robot. Retrieved from http://www.araa.asn.au/acra/acra2008/papers/pap117s1.pdf?origin=publication_detail 10.03. 20172014
Lehmann, H., Marti, P. & Robins, B. (2011). Robots as social mediators for children with Autism - A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) and the International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics (EpiRob), Frankfurt, Germany, 24-27 August.
Leroux, P. (1999). Educational Robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, pp. 1080-1089.
Marti, P. (2005). L’interazione Uomo-Robot. Ergonomia 2, 50-57.
Marti, P. & Giusti, L. (2009). A robot Companion for Inclusive Games: a user-centred design perspective. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, 3-8 maggio.
Norman, D.A. (1994). How Might People Interact with Agents. Communications of the ACM 37 (7), July 1994, 68-71.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computer, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1993). The Children’s Machine. Rethinking school in the age of computer. New York: Basic Books.
Pearson, Y. & Borenstein, J. (2013). The Intervention of Robot Caregivers and the Cultivation of Children’s Capability to Play. Science and Engineering Ethics. 19 (1), 123-137.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). La Psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: PUF.
Rabbitt, S.M, Kazdin, A.L & Scassellati, B. (2014). Integrating Socially Assistive Robotics into Mental Healthcare Interventions: Applications and Recommendations for Expanded Use. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Feb;35:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001
Rakison, D.H. & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). The developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 209-228.
Robins, B. & Dautenhahn, K. (2014), Tactile Interactions with a Humanoid Robot: Novel Play Scenario Implementations with Children with Autism. International Journal of Social Robotics. Retrieved from http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/578/art%253A10.1007%252Fs12369-014-0228-0.pdf?auth66=1404289696_ff11915700c75528370176e76e39777f&ext=.pdf 12.03.2017
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K. & Dickerson, P. (2009). From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot, Procs of 2nd Int Conf on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction: ACHI'09. vol. 2009, IEEE, 205-211. DOI: 10.1109/ACHI.2009.32
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R. & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?, Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 4, 2, 105–120
Scassellati, B., Admoni, H. & Matarić, M. (2012). Robot for use in autism research. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 14, 275-294.
Scholl, B.J. &Tremoulet, P.D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Cognitive Science, 4, pp 22-28.
Shibata, T., Wada, K., Saito, T. & Tanie K. (2001). Mental Commit Robot and its Application to Therapy of Children. Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference On AIM 01, Como, Italy.
Smith, L.B. & Heise, D. (1992). Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. In Burn, B. Percepts, concepts and categories. Ed. Elseiver.
Strollo, M.R. (2008). Scienze cognitive e aperture pedagogiche. Nuovi orizzonti nella formazione degli insegnanti, Franco Angeli, Milano.
Tapus, A., Matarić, M.J.& Scassellati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics. Grand Challenges of Robotics, IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag.,14
Villano M., Crowell C.R., Wier K., Tang K., Thomas B., Shea N., … Diehl J.J. (2011), DOMER: A Wizard of Oz interface for using interactive robots to scaffold social skills for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Human-Robot Interaction, 279-280.
