Comparative Study on Educational Management in Public and Private Institutions in the Twin Cities of Pakistan

Open access


The aim of this research paper is to compare the quality of education delivered at the undergraduate level in the public and private institutions of the Twin Cities (Islamabad and Rawalpindi) in Pakistan. Data is collected with the help of questionnaires from 246 students. The data was collected from three public and three private educational institutions of the Twin Cities, and the age of students ranged from 18 to 27 years. The research instrument used in this paper is the independent sample t-test to find the difference between the three private and three public educational institutions selected in Rawalpindi and Islamabad in terms of different variables that are very important in measuring the quality of education. For analysis, Levene’s test was adopted, which reflects the variations in educational quality with respect to academic staff availability in the twin cities. The differences in close supervision of students by academic staff between public and private sector educational institutions were also analysed, and the results reflected a difference between private and public educational institutions with respect to close supervision of students. The results also highlighted the factors that are involved in higher performance of students in private institutes as compared to that of students in public institutes. These factors can be implemented in the public sector to increase student performance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agarwal P. (2007). Higher education in India: Growth concerns and change agenda. Higher Education Quarterly 61(2) 197-207.

  • Altbach P. G. (Ed.). (1999). Private Prometheus: private higher education and development in the 21st century (No. 77). Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Bevan D. & Kipka C. (2012). Experiential learning and management education. Journal of Management Development 31(3) 193-197.

  • Bloom D. E. Hartley M. & Rosovsky H. (2006). Beyond private gain: The public benefits of higher education. In International handbook of higher education (pp. 293-308). Springer Netherlands.

  • Brandon-Jones A. Piercy N. & Slack N. (2012). Bringing teaching to life: exploring innovative approaches to operations management education. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 32(12) 1369-1374.

  • Crawford F. (1991) “Total quality management” Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals London occasional paper December.

  • Halai N. (2013). The quality of private universities in Pakistan: An analysis of higher education commission rankings 2012. International Journal of Educational Management 27(7) 775-786.

  • Halai N. (2011). Private higher education in Pakistan. International Higher Education 64 21.

  • Leghari J. (2010) “Interview Javaid R. Leghari: Chairperson HEC” available at: (Accessed on August 10 2016).

  • Madu C. N. Kuei C. H. &Winokur D. (1994). Total quality management in the university: a quality code of honor. Total Quality Management 5(6) 375-390.

  • Muralidharan K. & Kremer M. (2006).Public and private schools in rural India.Harvard University Department of Economics Cambridge MA.

  • Narang R. (2012). How do management students perceive the quality of education in public institutions?.Quality Assurance in Education 20(4) 357-371.

  • Ploom K and Haldma T. (2012) “Balanced performance management in the public education system” Baltic Journal of Management Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 183-207

  • PROBE (1999) Government Report on Basic Education in India Oxford University PressNew Delhi.

  • Sirvanci M. (1996). Are students the true customers of higher education?.Quality Progress 29(10) 99-104.

  • Tayyaba S. (2012). Rural-urban gaps in academic achievement schooling conditions student and teachers' characteristics in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management 26(1) 6-26.

  • Tierney W. &Sirat M. (2008). Challenges facing Malaysian higher education. International Higher Education 53 23-24.

  • Tilak J.B.G. (2006) Private Higher Education: Philanthropy to Profits Higher Education in the World 200 University of Barcelona UP Commons Barcelona.

  • UNICEF. (2000). Defining Quality in Education. A paper presented by UNICEF at the meeting of The International Working Group on Education Florence Italy June 2000 (p. 3). Preface of the Working Paper. Document No. UNICEF/PD/ED/00/02.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1958 1073 11
PDF Downloads 1004 562 9