Innovations in the continuing professional development of foreign language teachers: from blended learning to visual-based learning, choices of emotional and instructional designs


In this study, starting from the profile of our trainees and from the risks highlighted by some studies in terms of the use of video in education, we will analyse the motivations and choices behind the development of the online training model for Foreign Language teachers. We will show how, in order to cope with the impossibility of continuing with blended training, we were directed to a model more closely linked with visual-based learning. We explain our instructional and emotional design choices to support and direct our teacher trainees to flexible learning and the use of media and Web 2.0 in their classrooms. Finally, we investigate the possible problems in terms of sustainability and technical feasibility, comparing the development of two prototypes of videos made using the techniques of video scribing and whiteboard animation: a video interview and a video animation.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adamo-Villani, N., Cui, J., & Popescu, V. (2014). Scripted Animation Towards Scalable Content Creation for eLearning-A Quality Analysis. In E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 1-9). Springer International Publishing.

  • Ainsworth, S., &Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and instruction, 14(3), 241-255.

  • Ausubel, D. P. (2004). Educazione e processi cognitivi. Guida psicologica per gli insegnanti (Vol. 25). FrancoAngeli.

  • Cercone, K. (2008). Characteristics of adult learners with implications for online learning design. AACE journal, 16(2), 137-159.

  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and instruction, 8(4), 293-332.

  • Chen, Y. T. (2012). The effect of thematic video-based instruction on learning and motivation in e-learning. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 7(6), 957-965.

  • Coscia, L. (2016). Linguaggi per la formazione: dall’ipertesto al video. In PON Lingua, letteratura e cultura in una dimensione europea - Area Lingue straniere. Attuazione, risultati e prospettive, (pp. 85-91). Firenze: INDIRE. Retrieved from:

  • Croft, H., Rasiah, R., Cooper, J., & Nesbitt, K. (2014). Comparing Animation with Video For Teaching Communication Skills. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 1-10). ACM

  • Dale, E., Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, 1969, NY: Dryden Press.

  • Frey, B. A., & Sutton, J. M. (2010). A model for developing multimedia learning projects. Merlot journal of online learning and teaching, 6(2).Retrieved from

  • Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50). ACM.

  • Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C. L., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM, Mathematics Education, 43(1), 91-103.

  • Hibbert, M. C. (2014). What Makes an Online Instructional Video Compelling?.Educause Review Online. Retrieved from

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271-289.

  • Kuomi, J. (2006). Designing Video and Multimedia for Open and Flexible Learning. Oxford: Routledge.

  • LeFever, L. (2012). The Art of Explanation, Enhanced Edition: Making your Ideas, Products, and Services Easier to Understand. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lin, H. (2011). Facilitating learning from animated instruction: Effectiveness of questions and feedback as attentiondirecting strategies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 31-42.

  • Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of educational psychology, 83(4), 484.

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

  • Galliani, L., Maragliano, R. (eds.)(2002). Educazione ai media, “Studium Educationis”, 3, 73-76.

  • Musa, S., Ziatdinov, R., & Griffiths, C. (2013). Introduction to computer animation and its possible educational applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.1824.

  • Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books

  • Popescu, V., Adamo-Villani, N., Wu, M. L., Rajasekaran, S. D., Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M., & Cook, S. W. (2014). Animation Killed the Video Star. In Proceedings of CHI 2104 Workshop on Gesture-based Interaction Design: Communication and Cognition Toronto, Canada, April 2014. ACM Digital Library, 55-59.

  • Parigi L., Rossi F. (2010) Italy: Ict and In Service Teacher Training - Blended E Learning Provided by Punto Edu. In Balanskat, A., & Gertsch, C. A. (2010). Digital Skills Working Group. In Review of national curricula and assessing digital competence for students and teachers: Findings from 7 countries. European Schoolnet Brüssels.

  • Parigi L, Di Stasio M., Mangione M.G., Pettenati M.C., Formiconi A., Guasti L, Russo C, Federici G., Faggioli M (2015). Bridging formal and informal learning in teachers professional development: experiences and innovative environments. In Falcinelli, F., Minerva, T., & Rivoltella, P. C. (Eds.), Apertura e flessibilità nell’istruzione superiore: oltre l’E-Learning? Proceedings of the X Convegno della Società Italiana di e-learning, Perugia, 13-14-15 Novembre (pp. 210-229). Reggio Emilia: SIe-L editore.

  • Rivoltella, P.C. (2001). Media Education. Roma: Carocci.

  • Smith, D., McLaughlin, T., & Brown, I. (2012). 3-D Computer Animation vs. Live-Action Video: Differences in Viewers’ Response to Instructional Vignettes. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 41-54.

  • Thomas, M., Reinders, H. and Warschauer, M. (Eds) (2013),Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning, Bloomsbury, London Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2013). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO journal, 22(3), 371-397.

  • Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Video-Based Learning: A Critical Analysis of The Research Published in 2003-2013 and Future Visions. In eLmL 2014, The Sixth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On - line Learning,112 - 119

  • Toci, V., Camizzi, L., Goracci, S., Borgi, R., De Santis, F., Coscia, L.,Perrone F., Cigognini E., Pettenati, M. C. (2015). Designing, producing and exemplifying videos to support reflection and metacognition for in-service teachers training. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(2).

  • Thurairaj, S., & Roy, S. S. (2012). Teachers’ emotions in ELT material design. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 232-236. Retrieved from:

  • Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485-498.

  • Vieira, I., Lopes, A. P., &Soares, F. (2014). The potential benefits of using videos in higher education. IATED Publications,. 750-756.

  • Wang, S., Vásquez, C.(2012) Web 2.0 and second language learning: What does the research tell us. CALICO journal, 29(3), 412-430.

  • Wever, B. D., Mechant, P., Veevaete, P., & Hauttekeete, L. (2007, December). E-Learning 2.0: social software for educational use. In Multimedia Workshops, 2007. ISMW'07. Ninth IEEE International Symposium on, 511-516.

  • Winslett, G. (2014). What counts as educational video?: Working toward best practice alignment between video production approaches and outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5). Retrieved from:

  • Zhang, D. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 149-162.


Journal + Issues