Actors and Actions in Prenups and Capitulaciones Matrimoniales: A Cross-Cultural Study

Open access

Actors and Actions in Prenups and Capitulaciones Matrimoniales: A Cross-Cultural Study

The investigation of a corpus of American prenuptial agreements and Spanish capitulaciones matrimoniales shows how the popularity of premarital contracts is spreading everywhere. The American and the Spanish documents, juridically diverse in many aspects, embedded in two different legal systems, belong to the genre of contracts and are classified as a type of negotiation/mediation. The lexical and semantic analysis focuses on the specialized terminology used to refer to the human actors and their actions within the documents. The aim is to discover whether and how legal, intercultural and sociological divergences emerge from the textual context. Participants play several roles in the various semantic-pragmatic units constituting the contract, being in turn considered as contracting parties, married couple, notary public, parents, esposos, padres, and otorgantes. Their actions are highlighted by a punctual and proper use of verbal constructions and speech acts, such as asserting, signing, stipulating, agreeing. The study demonstrates how actors and actions do not stand autonomously and separately: they perform and fulfil a specific pragmatic function in a precise legal and cultural context.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Al Mureden Enrico. 2005. I prenuptial agreements negli Stati Uniti e nella prospettiva del diritto italiano. University of Bologna Faculty of Law. http://www.corsodirittofamiglia.it/allegati/contr_almureden.pdf. Later published in FAMIGLIA E DIRITTO 2005 5 543 - 570. http://www.corsodirittofamiglia.it/allegati/contr_almureden.pdf

  • Denti Olga and Michela Giordano. 2010. "Till Money (and Divorce) Do Us Part: premarital agreements in the American and Spanish legal discourse". In Bhatia Vijay K. Christopher N. Candlin and Maurizio Gotti eds. The Discourses of Dispute Resolution. Bern: Peter Lang 101-125.

  • Fraser Bruce 1975. Hedged Performatives. In Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan eds. Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3. Speech Acts. New York San Francisco London: Academic Press 187-210.

  • Garzone Giuliana. 2003. Arbitration rules across legal cultures. In Bhatia Vijay K. Christopher N. Candlin and Maurizio Gotti eds. Legal Discourse in Multilingual and Multicultural Contexts. Arbitration Texts in Europe. Bern: Peter Lang 177-220.

  • Gotti Maurizio. 2005. Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.

  • Klein Philip W. 1968. Modal Auxiliaries in Spanish. Studies in Linguistics and Language Learning. Volume IV. Seattle: University of Washington.

  • Lamarca I Marquès Albert Esther Farnós Amorós Albert Azagra Malo and Mireira Artigot Golobardes. 2003. Separate Property and Family Self-Determination in Catalonia: A Peaceful Model Under a Change? Working Paper of Catalan Law No: 164 Barcelona October 2003 http://www.indret.com

  • Salmi-Tolonen Tarja. 2003. Arbitration Law as Action: An Analysis of the Finnish Arbitration Act. In Bhatia Vijay K. Christopher N. Candlin and Maurizio Gotti eds. Legal Discourse in Multilingual and Multicultural Contexts. Arbitration Texts in Europe. Bern: Peter Lang 313-336.

  • Šarčević Susan. 2000. New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

  • Williams Christopher. 2005. Legal English and Plain Language: an introduction. ESP Across Cultures 2004 1. Milano: B.A. Graphis 111-124.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 110 39 1
PDF Downloads 121 94 6