Prosodically-conditioned Syllable Structure in English

Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the interplay between the metrical structure and phonotactic complexity in English, a language with lexical stress and an elaborate inventory of consonant clusters. The analysis of a dictionary- and corpus-based list of polysyllabic words leads to two major observations. First, there is a tendency for onsetful syllables to attract stress, and for onsetless syllables to repel it. Second, the stressed syllable embraces a greater array of consonant clusters than unstressed syllables. Moreover, the farther form the main stress, the less likely the unstressed syllable is to contain a complex onset. This finding indicates that the ability of a position to license complex onsets is related to its distance from the prosodic head.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Baayen Harald R. Piepenbrock Richard and Léon Gulikers. 1993. The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia PA: Linguistics Data Consortium University of Pennsylvania.

  • Chomsky Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

  • Clements George N. and Samuel J. Keyser. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Cruttenden Alan. 2014. Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. 8th edn. London New York: Routledge.

  • Davies Mark. 2011. Word Frequency Data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [Online] Available from: http://www.wordfrequency. [Accessed: 24th January 2011].

  • Davis Stuart. 1988. Syllable onsets as a factor in stress rules. Phonology 5. 1-19.

  • Everett Dan and Keren Everett. 1984. On the relevance of syllable onsets to stress placement. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 705-711.

  • Halle Morris and Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Hayes Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Hillenbrand James M. 2003. American English: Southern Michigan. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33. 121-126.

  • Hornby Albert S. 1974. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Hyman Larry. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.

  • Kelly Michael H. 2004. Word onset patterns and lexical stress in English. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 231-244.

  • Orzechowska Paula Mołczanow Janina and Michał Jankowski. 2018. Struktura syllaby a akcent wyrazowy w języku rosyjskim: Badanie korpusowe Studia et Documenta. Slavica 1–2 (5–6) 79-91. DOI: 10.25167/SetDS/2018/1-2/7

  • Roach Peter. 2004. British English: Received Pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34. 239-245.

  • Roach Peter. 2006. English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ryan Kevin M. 2014. Onsets contribute to syllable weight: Statistical evidence from stressed meter. Language 90. 309-341.

  • Selkirk Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Topintzi Nina. 2010. Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Trnka Bohumil. 1966. A Phonological Analysis of Present-day Standard English. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.

  • Zydorowicz Paulina Orzechowska Paula Jankowski Michał Dziubalska-Kołaczyk Katarzyna Wierzchoń Piotr and Dawid Pietrala. 2016. Phonotactics and Morphonotactics of Polish and English: Description Tools and Applications. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 118 118 16
PDF Downloads 66 66 19