Poster, Poster on the Wall, Do you Really Mean It All?

Open access


The tendency to create messages using the elements belonging to different semiotic systems shifts our perception of a communicative act, contributing to the establishment of multimodal and intersemiotic communication practice.

A visual metaphor is seen as one of the instances of a multimodal and intersemiotic message, which generates a text that is revealed gradually, uncovering numerous layers of meaning encoded within a metaphor and within visual, linguistic, and spatial settings it is placed in.

The paper sets out to explore the notion of a visual metaphor and focuses on the application of the visual metaphor ‘global warming’ on posters created for the needs of public awareness campaigns, investigating simultaneous manifestation of iconic and metaphorical mappings in the given visual metaphor.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albers Peggy and Sharon Murphy. 1999. Telling Pieces. Art as Literacy in Middle School Classes. Taylor and Francis.

  • Anderson Douglas. 1984. Peirce on Metaphor. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 20(4) 453-468.

  • Anstey Michelle and Geoff Bull. 2006. Teaching and Learning Multiliteracies: Changing Times Changing Literacies. Newark DE: International Reading Association.

  • Boehm Gottfried. 1995. Bildbeschreibung. Über die Grenzen von Bild und Sprache. In Boehm Gottfried; Pfotenhauer H. (Hg.): Beschreibungskunst - Kunstbeschreibung. Die Ekphrasis von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart München 23-40.

  • Caroll Noel. 2001. Beyond Aesthetics. Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cox Robert and Phaedra C. Pezzullo. 2015. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere 440. SAGE Publications; 4th ed.

  • Dall’Aqua Luisa. 2015. Orientism Management (OM): A New Framework to Manage Decisions and Hyper Dynamic Knowledge Process in a MultiUser Network. In Alok Kumar Goel and Puja Singhal (eds.) Product Innovation through Knowledge Management and Social Media Strategies. IGI Global.

  • Danesi Marcel. 1995. The Iconicity of Metaphor. In Marge E. Landesberg (ed.) Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension 265-284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Danto Arthur. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Demey Eline Van Herreweghe Mieke and Myriam Vermeerbergen. 2008. Iconicity in Sign Languages. In Klaas Willems and Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.) Naturalness and Iconicity in Language 189-214. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Elleström Lars. 2010. The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations. In Lars Elleström (ed.) Media Borders Multimodality and Intermediality 11-48. Hound- mills Basingstoke and Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Forceville Charles. 1996. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. Routledge.

  • Forceville Charles and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.). 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Applications in Cognitive Linguistics Vol. 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Gibbons Alison. 2012. Multimodality Cognition and Experimental Literature. Routledge studies in Multimodality: 3. Routledge.

  • Heffernan James A. W. 1993. Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hiraga Masako K. 1998. Metaphor-icon Link in Poetic Texts: A Cognitive Approach to Iconicity. Journal of the University of the Air No. 16. 95-123.

  • Ibáñez Daniel Barredo and Martin Oller Alonso. 2015. Multimedia resources and Sporting Bias in and An Analysis of Matches between Real Madrid C.F. and F. Barcelona in 2010-11. In Simon Gwyn Roberts (ed.) Sport Media and Regional Identity 91-104. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.

  • Iyer Radha and Luke Carmen. 2010. Multimodal Multiliteracies: Texts and Lietracies for the 21st Century. In Darren L. Pullen and David R. Cole (eds.) Multilietracies and technology Enhanced Education: Social Practice and the Global Classroom 18-34. IGI Global.

  • Jensen Klaus Bruhn. 2008. Intermediality. In W. Donsbach (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Communication 2385-2387. Malden MA USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

  • Kant Immanuel. 1790. [1964]. The Critique of Judgement. In Hofstadter and Kuhns (eds.) Philosophies of Art and Beauty: Selected Readings in Aesthetics from Plato to Hedegger New York: Modern Library.

  • Kress Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design London: Routledge.

  • Kress Gunther Jewitt Carey Ogborn Jon and Charalampos Tsatsarelis. 2001. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Continuum.

  • Lakoff George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Marcuccilli Strop Janice and Jennifer Carlson. 2010. Multimedia Text Sets. Changing the Shape of Engagement and Learning. Portage and Main Press.

  • Massaro Dominic W. 1975. Understanding Language. An Information-Processing Analysis of Speech Perception Reading and Psycholinguistics. Academic Press INC.

  • May Michael. 2007. A Semiotic Framework for the Semantics of Digital Multimedia Learning Objects. 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing Workshops 2007. ICIAPW 2007. 33-38. Los Alamitos CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Moser Sybylle. 2007. Iconicity in Multimedia performance: Laurie Anderson’s White Lily. In Elżbieta Tabakowska et al. (eds.) Insistent Images 232-347. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • MWD – Merriam Webster Dictionary – Available from: [Accessed on 9 June 2017].

  • Nelson Robin. 2010. Introduction: Prospective Mapping and Network of Terms. In S. Bay-Cheng C. Kattenbelt A. Lavender and R. Nelson (eds.) Mapping Intermediality in Performance 13-24. Amsterdam University Press.

  • Nevid Jeffrey S. 2015. Essentials of Psychology. Concepts and Applications. Cengage Learning.

  • Petrilli Susan. 2003. Translation Translation. Amsterdam and New York Rodopi.

  • Platonova Marina. 2015. Applying Emotive Rhetorical Strategy to Environmental Communication in English and Latvian. In Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences 107-113. Vol. 236. Elsevier.

  • Plutchik Robert. 1980. Emotion: Theory Research and Experience: Vol. 1. Theories of Emotion 1. New York: Academic Press.

  • Purchase Helen and Daniel Naumann. 2001. A Semiotic Model of Multimedia: Theory and Evaluation. In Syed Mahbubur Rahman (ed.) Design and Management of Multimedia Information Systems: Opportunities and Challenges 1-21. Idea Group Publishing.

  • Siapera Eugenia. 2012. Understanding New Media. SAGE Publications LTD.

  • Stathi Irini. 2014. Film and New Art Media Semiotics: On the Figural. In Evripides Zantides (ed.) Semiotics and Visual Communication: Concepts and Practices 139-149. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.

  • Taub Sarah. 2001. Language from the Body. Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: CUP.

  • Wagner Peter. 1996. Introduction: Ekphrasis Iconotexts and Intermediality – the State(s) of the Art(s). In Wagner Peter (ed.) Icons-Texts-Iconotexts. Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality 1-42. Walter De Gruyter & Co.

  • Wendorf Richard. 1990. The Elements of Life: Biography and Portrait-painting in Stuart and Georgian England. Clarendon Press.

  • Wolf Werner. 1999. The Musicalization of Fiction: A Study in the Theory and History of Intermediality. Internationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Literaturwissenschft 35. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Wolf Werner. 2005. Intermediality. In David Herman Manfred Jahn and Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory 252-256. London: Routledge.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 143 143 22
PDF Downloads 107 107 17