Discourse-Pragmatic and Processing-Related Motivators of the ordering of Reason Clauses in an Academic Corpus

Open access


The present research is aimed at examining the relative importance of the competing motivators of the sequencing of reason clauses in a corpus of research articles of applied linguistics. All the finite reason clauses accompanied by their main clauses in this corpus were collected. Random forest of conditional inference trees is the statistical modelling in this study. The findings showed that sentence-final reason clauses outnumber sentenceinitial ones. Moreover, subordinator choice and bridging, which are discourse-pragmatic constraints on clause positioning, emerged as the two more powerful predictors of the ordering of reason clauses in this corpus. Furthermore, the complexity of the clause turned out to be a stronger processing-related predictor than the length of the clause.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aarts Bass. 1988. Clauses of Concession in Written Present-day British English. Journal of English Linguistics 2. 39-85.

  • Arnold Jennifer E. Losongco Anthony Thomas Wasow and Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness vs. Newness: The Effects of Structural Complexity and Discourse Status on Constituent Ordering. Language 76(1). 28-55.

  • Bever Thomas G. 1970. The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures. In: John R. Hayes (ed) Cognition and the Development of Language 279-362. Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Biber Douglas Johansson Stig Leech Gwoffrey Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

  • Birner Betty J. and Gregory Ward. 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Breiman Leo. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45 (1). 5-32.

  • Chafe Wallace. 1984. How People Use Adverbial Clauses. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10. 437-49.

  • Dahl Östen. 2004. The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Diessel Holger. 2001. The Ordering Distribution of Main and adverbial Clauses: A typological Stud. Language 77 (3). 433-455.

  • Diessel Holger. 2005. Competing Motivations for the Ordering of Main and Adverbial Clauses. Linguistics 43 (3). 449-470.

  • Diessel Holger. 2008. Iconicity of Sequence: A Corpus-based Analysis of the Positioning of Temporal Adverbial Clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 19 (3). 465-490.

  • Ford Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gibson Edward. 1998. Linguistic Complexity: Locality of syntactic Dependencies. Cognition 68 (1). 1-76.

  • Gibson Edward. 2000. The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-based Theory of Linguistic Complexity. In: Alec Marantz Yasushi Miyashita and Wayne O’Neil (eds.) Image Language Brain 95-126. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Givón Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction. vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Givón Talmy. 2011. Ute Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Greenbaum Sidney and Gerald Nelson. 1996. Positions of Adverbial Clauses in British English. World Englishes 15 (1). 69-81.

  • Hawkins John. A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hawkins John A. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hothorn Torsten Hornik Kurt and Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3). 651-674.

  • Iwasaki Noriko. 2010. Style Shifts Among Japanese Learners Before and After Study Abroad in Japan: Becoming Active Social Agents in Japanese. Applied Linguistics 31 (1). 45-71.

  • Kirk John M. 1997. Subordinate Clauses in English. Journal of English Linguistics 25 (4). 349-364.

  • Li Ming and Vitányi Paul. 1997. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Miestamo Matti. 2006. On the feasibility of complexity metrics. In FinEst linguistics proceedings of the annual Finnish and Estonian conference of linguistics Tallinn 11-26.

  • Mukherjee Joybrato. 2001. Principles of pattern selection. Journal of English linguistics 29 (4). 295-314.

  • Quirk Randolph. et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

  • Rezaee Abbas Ali and Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar. 2016. The Sequencing of Adverbial Clauses of Time in Academic English: Random Forest Modelling. Journal of Language Modelling 4(2) 225-244.

  • Rezaee Abbas Ali and Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar. 2017. Conditional Inference Tree Modelling of Competing Motivators of the Positioning of Concessive Clauses: The Case of a Non-native Corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 24(2-3) 89-106.

  • Saif Shahrzad. 2006. Aiming for Positive Washback: A Case Study of International Teaching Assistants. Language Testing 23 (1). 1-34.

  • Schoonen Rob. et al. 2011. Modelling the Development of L1 and EFL Writing Proficiency of Secondary School Students. Language learning 61(1). 31-79.

  • Shizuka Tetsuhito Takeuchi Osamu Tomoko Yashima and Kiyomi Yoshizawa. 2006. A Comparison of Three-and Four-Option English Tests for university Entrance Selection Purposes in Japan. Language Testing 23 (1). 35-57.

  • Tagliamonte Sali A. and Harald R. Baayen. 2012. Models Forests and Trees of York English: Was/were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice. Language Variation and Change 24 (2). 135-178.

  • Thompson Sandra A. Rober A. Longacre and Shin Ja J. Hwang. 2007. Adverbial Clauses. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description 237-300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Thompson Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and Written Discourse. Initial and Final Purpose Clauses in English. In: Talmy Givón (ed.) Quantified Studies in Discourse. Special Issue of Text 5 55-84.

  • Trude Alison M. and Natasha Tokowicz. 2011. Negative Transfer from Spanish and English to Portuguese Pronunciation: The Roles of Inhibition and Working Memory. Language Learning 61(1). 259-280.

  • Vandepitte Sonia. 1993. A Pragmatic Study of the Expression and the Interpretation of Causality: Aonjuncts and Conjunctions in Modern Spoken British English. Brussel: Paleis der Academiën.

  • Vafaee Payman Basheer Nesrine and Reese Heitner. 2012. Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis in Construct Validity Investigation: The Case of the Grammar Sub-Test of the CEP Placement Exam. Iranian Journal of Language Testing 2 (1). 1-19.

  • Verstraete Jean-Christophe. 2004. Initial and Final Position for Adverbial Clauses in English: The Constructional Basis of the Discursive and Syntactic Differences. Linguistics 42 (4). 819-853.

  • Vulanovic Relja. 2007. On Measuring Language Complexity as Relative to the Conveyed Linguistic Information. SKY Journal of Linguistics 20. 399-427.

  • Wasow Thompson. 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • Wiechmann Daniel and Kerz Elma. 2013. The Positioning of Concessive Adverbial Clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 17. 1-22.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 156 156 13
PDF Downloads 120 120 3