Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance

Open access

Abstract

Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors′ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allport Gordon W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt & Co.

  • Ardissono Liliana Boella Guido and Rossana Damiano. 1998. A plan-based model of misunderstandings in cooperative dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48. 649-679.

  • Bachman Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Banks Stephen P. Ge Gao and Joyce Baker. 1991. Intercultural Encounters and Miscommunication. In Nikolas Coupland Howard Giles and John M. Weimann (eds.) “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk 103-120. London: Sage.

  • Bardovi-Harlig Kathleen. 2002. A New Starting Point? Investigating Formulaic Use and Input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 189-198. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Barkow Jerome H. Cosmides Leda and John Tooby. (eds.). 1992. The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bazzanella Carla and Rossana Damiano. 1999. The Interactional Handling of Misunderstanding in Everyday Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 817-836. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bekkering Harold et al. 2009. Joint Action: Neurocognitive Mechanisms Supporting Human Interaction. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 340-352. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Berger Charles R. 2007. A Tale of Two Communication Modes: When Rational and Experiential Processing Systems Encounter Statistical and Anecdotal Depictions of Threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (3). 215-233. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bialystok Ellen. 1993. Symbolic Representation and Attentional Control in Pragmatic Competence. In Gabriele Kasper and Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage Pragmatics 43-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Blum-Kulka Shoshana. 1992. The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society. In Richard J. Watts Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History Theory and Practice 255-279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Blum-Kulka Shoshana and Elda Weizman. 2003. Misunderstandings in Political Interviews. In Juliane House Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.) Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk 127-128. London: Longman.

  • Bosco Francesca M. Bucciarelli Monica and Bruno G. Bara. 2006. Recognition and Repair of Communicative Failures: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1398-149. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Brown Gillian. 1995. Speakers Listeners and Communication. Explorations in Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Brown Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Canale Michael. 1983. From Communicative Competence To Communicative Language Pedagogy. In Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt (eds.) Language and Communication 2-28. London: Longman.

  • Carruthers Peter. 2009. How We Know Our Minds: The Relationship Between Mindreading and Metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2). 121-138. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Carston Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Celce-Murcia Marianne Dornyei Zoltan and Sarah Thurrell. 1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Modifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 5. 5-35.

  • Clark Herbert H. and Meredyth A. Krych. 2004. Speaking While Monitoring Addressees for Understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 62-81. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Clément Fabrice Koenig Melissa and Paul Harris. 2004. The ontogeny of trust. Mind & Language 19 (4). 360-379.

  • Codó Olsina Eva. 2002. Managing Understanding in Intercultural Talk: An Empirical Approach to Miscommunication. Atlantis 24 (2). 37-57.

  • Dascal Marcelo. 1999. Introduction: Some Questions About Misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 753-762. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dua Hans R. 1990. The phenomenology of miscommunication. In Stephen H. Riggins (ed.) Beyond Goffman 113-139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Ehrman Madeline. 1999. Ego Boundaries and Tolerance of Ambiguity in Second Language Learning. In Jane Arnold (ed.) Affect in Language Learning 68-86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Escandell Vidal Maria V. 1998. Politeness: A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11. 45-57.

  • Escandell Vidal Maria V. 2004. Norms and Principles. Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together. In Rosina Marquez-Reiter and Maria E. Placencia (eds.) Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish 347-371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Ferreira Victor S. Slevc Robert and Erin S. Rogers. 2005. How Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguous Linguistic Expressions? Cognition 96. 263-284. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Friedrich James. 1993. Primary Error Detection and Minimization (PEDMIN) Strategies in Social Cognition: A Reinterpretation of Confirmation Bias Phenomena. Psychological Review 100 (2). 298-319. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Furnham Adrian and Tracy Ribchester. 1995. Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of The Concept its Measurement and Applications. Current Psychology 14. 179-199. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Garrod Simon and Martin J. Pickering. 2009. Joint Action Interactive Alignment and Dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 292-304. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gass Susan M. and Evangeline M. Varonis. 1991. Miscommunication in Nonnative Speaker Discourse. In Nikolas Coupland Howard Giles and John M. Wiemann (eds.) “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk 121-145. London: Sage.

  • Grimshaw Allen D. 1980. Mishearings Misunderstandings and Other Nonsuccesses in Talk: A Plea for Redress of Speaker-Oriented Bias. Sociological Inquiry 40. 31-74.

  • Hartman Ernest. 1991. Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. New York: Basic Books.

  • Hays Robert B. 1984. The Development and Maintenance of Friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1. 75-98. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hinnenkamp Volker. 2003. Misunderstandings: Interactional Structure and Strategic Resources. In Juliane House Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.) Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk 57-81. London: Sage.

  • House Juliane Kasper Gabriele and Steven Ross. 2003. Misunderstanding Talk. In Juliane House Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.) Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk 1-21. London: Sage.

  • Hymes Dell H. 1972. On Communicative Competence. In John B. Pride and Janet Holmes (eds.) Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings 269-293. Baltimore: Penguin Books.

  • Ide Sachiko. 1989. Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua 8 (2-3). 223-248. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Janicki Karol. 2010. Lay People’s Language Problems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1). 73-94. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jucker Andreas H. Smith Sara W. and Tanja Ludge. 2003. Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1737-1769. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kataoka Kuniyoshi. 1995. Affect in Japanese Women’s Letter Writing: Use of Sentence-Final Particles Ne and Yo and Orthographic Conventions. Pragmatics 5 (4). 427-453. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kecskes Istvan. 2004. Editorial: Lexical Merging Conceptual Blending and Cultural Crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (1). 1-26. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kecskes Istvan. 2007. Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 385-406. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kecskes Istvan. 2010. The Paradox of Communication. Socio-cognitive Approach to Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1 (1). 50-73. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kecskes Istvan and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating Seeking and Creating Common Ground. Pragmatics & Cogniton 17 (2). 331-355. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Keysar Boaz. 2007. Communication and Miscommunication: the Role of Egocentric Processes. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4). 71-85. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Keysar Boaz and Anne S. Henly. 2002. Speakers’ Overestimation of Their Effectiveness. Psychological Science 13 (3). 207-212. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Klayman Joshua. 1995. Varieties of Confirmation Bias. In Jerome Busemeyer Reid Hartie and Douglas L. Medin (eds.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 385-418. Vol. 32. New York: Academic Press.

  • Kunda Ziva. 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Boston: MIT Press.

  • Márquez-Reiter Rosina. 1997. Politeness Phenomena in British English and Uruguayan Spanish: The Case of Requests. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 18. 159-167.

  • Mascaro Olivier and Dan Sperber. 2009. The Moral Epistemic and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance Towards Deception. Cognition 112 (3). 367-380. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mazzarella Diana. 2013. ‘Optimal Relevance’ as a Pragmatic Criterion: The Role of Epistemic Vigilance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 25. 20-45.

  • Mazzarella Diana. 2015. Pragmatics and Epistemic Vigilance: The Deployment of Sophisticated Interpretative Strategies. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44). 183-199.

  • Medina Jose. 2011. The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge Culture and Policy 25 (1). 15-35. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Mercier Hugo and Dan Sperber. 2011. Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2). 57-111. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Michaelian Kourken. 2013. The evolution of testimony: Receiver vigilance speaker honesty and the reliability of communication. Episteme 10 (1). 37-59. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Miller Michael and Donald. Perlis. 1993. Presentations and this and that: Logic in action. In Martha C. Polson (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 83-88. Boulder: Psychology Press.

  • Mustajoki Arto. 2012. A speaker-oriented multidimensional approach to risks and causes of miscommunication. Language and Dialogue 2 (2). 216-246. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Nickerson Raymond S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2 (2). 175-220.

  • Origgi Gloria. 2013. Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge Culture and Policy 26 (2). 221-235. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2005. Towards new politeness systems. In Juan J. Calvo Garcia de Leonardo et al. (eds.) Actas del XXVIII Congreso Internacional de AEDEAN 385-396. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.

  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2012. Epistemic vigilance cautious optimism and sophisticated understanding. Research in Language 10 (4). 365-386. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2013a. Understanding and overcoming pragmatic failure in intercultural communication: From focus on speakers to focus on hearers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51 (1). 23-54. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2013b. Metapsychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal of Pragmatics 59 (A). 117-135. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2014. Pragmatic Failure Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Vigilance. Language & Communication 39. 34-50. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2015. On the Role of Vigilance in the Interpretation of Puns. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 28 (3). 469-490. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Padilla Cruz Manuel. 2016. Vigilance Mechanisms in Interpretation: Hermeneutical Vigilance. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133 (1). 21-29. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Perlis Donald Purang Khemdut and Carl Andersen. 1998. Conversational Adequacy: Mistakes are the Essence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48. 553-575. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds Mike. 1995. Where the Trouble Lies: Cross-cultural Pragmatics and Miscommunication. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 30. 5-15.

  • Ryan Jonathon and Roger Barnard. 2009. “Who Do You Mean?” Investigating Miscommunication in Paired Interactions. The TESOLANZ Journal 17. 44-62.

  • Sebanz Natalie and Guenther Knoblich. 2009. Prediction in Joint Action: What when and where. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 353-367. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Shintel Hadas and Boaz Keysar. 2009. Less is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 260-273. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Spencer-Oatey Helen D. 1996. Reconsidering Power and Distance. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 1-24. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sperber Dan. 1994. Understanding Verbal Understanding. In Jean Khalfa (ed.) What Is Intelligence? 179-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sperber Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Sperber Dan. 1997. Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs. Mind & Language 12 (1). 67-83. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sperber Dan. (ed.). 2000. Metarepresentations. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sperber Dan. 2013. Speakers are Honest Because Hearers are Vigilant. Reply to Kourken Michaelian. Episteme 10 (1). 61-71. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sperber Dan and Hugo Mercier. 2012. Reasoning as a Social Competence. In Helene Landemore and Jon Elster (eds.) Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms 368-392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sperber Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Sperber Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Sperber Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 2015. Beyond Speaker’s Meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44). 117-149.

  • Sperber Dan et al. 2010. Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language 25 (4). 359-393. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tannen Deborah. 1984. The Pragmatics of Cross-Cultural Communication. Applied Linguistics 5 (3). 188-195. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tannen Deborah. 1991. You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago Press.

  • Tannen Deborah. 1992. That’s not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. London: Virago Press.

  • Tannen Deborah. 1994. Talking from 9 to 5. Women and Men at Work: Language Sex and Power. London: Virago Press.

  • Thomas Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics 4 (2). 91-112. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Todd Andrew R. et al. 2011. When Focusing on Differences Leads to Similar Perspectives. Psychological Science 22 (1). 134-141. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Verdonik Darinka. 2010. Between Understanding and Misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 1364-1379. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Weigand Edda. 1999. Misunderstanding: The Standard Case. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 763-785. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Weizman Elda. 1999. Building True Understanding Via Apparent Miscommunication: A Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 837-846. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wells John C. 1996. Accents of English 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wierzbicka Anna. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Wierzbicka Anna. 2010. Cross-cultural Communication and Miscommunication: The Role of Cultural Keywords. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (1). 1-23. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson Deirdre. 1999. Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 127-161.

  • Wilson Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2002. Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 249-287.

  • Wilson Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance Theory. In Larry Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Yus Ramos Francisco. 1999a. Towards a Pragmatic Taxonomy of Misunderstandings. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 38. 217-239.

  • Yus Ramos Francisco. 1999b. Misunderstandings and Explicit/Implicit Communication. Pragmatics 9 (4). 487-517. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Yus Ramos Francisco. 2000. On Reaching the Intended Ironic Interpretation. International Journal of Communication 10 (1-2). 27-78.

  • Zamborlin Chiara. 2007. Going Beyond Pragmatic Failures: Dissonance in Intercultural Communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (1). 21-50. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Žegarac Vladimir. 2009. A Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective on Communication and Culture. In Helen D. Spencer-Oatey and Peter Franklin (eds.) Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication 31-53. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 392 173 8
PDF Downloads 162 93 6