Dynamic Targets in the Acquisition of L2 English Vowels

Open access


This paper presents acoustic data on the dynamic properties of the FLEECE and TRAP vowels in the speech of two groups of Polish users of English. Results reveal that the more proficient group users, made up of teachers and professors with professional-level proficiency in English, produce more dramatic patterns of formant movement, reminiscent of native productions, than first year students. It is argued that vowel inherent spectral change (VISC) is an inherent aspect of English phonology, originated in interactions between vowels and neighboring consonants, and later generalized to the vowel system as a whole. By contrast, Polish is a language with a minimal role of VISC. Consequently, successful acquisition of L2 English vowels involves not only the mastery of vowels in F1- F2 space, but also formant trajectories over time.

Aperliński, G. and G. Schwartz. 2015. Release bursts vs. formant transitions in Polish stop place perception. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 18 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.

Bertinetto, P. 1989. Reflections on the dichotomy stress vs. syllable-timing. Revue de Phonetique Appliquee 91-93. 99-130.

Best, C. 1995. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171-204. Timonium, MD: York Press.

Best, C. T. and M. D. Tyler. 2007. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. J. Munro and O.-S. Bohn (eds.), Second language speech learning - the role of language experience in speech perception and production, 13-34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Bohn, O.-S. 1995. Cross language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 279-304. Timonium, MD: York Press.

Bohn, O.-S. and J. Flege. 1997. Perception and production of a new vowel category by secondlanguage learners. In A. James and J. Leather (eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process, 53-74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Docherty, G. 2010. Phonological innovation in contemporary spoken British English. In A. Kirkpatrick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes, 59-75. Routledge, London.

Donegan, P. and D. Stampe. 1983. Rhythm and the holistic organization of language structure. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, 337-353. Chicago: CLS 19.

Draxler, C. and K. Jansch. 2015. SpeechRecorder v. 2.X.X. [Software]. Available from: http://www.bas.unimuenchen.de/Bas/software/speechrecorder/

Dukiewicz, L. and I. Sawicka 1995. Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego - fonetyka I fonologia [Grammar of modern Polish - phonetics and phonology]. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Języka Polskiego PAN.

Eager, C. 2015. Automated voicing analysis in Praat: Statistically equivalent to manual segmentation. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 18 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Escudero, P. and P. Boersma. 2004. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26. 551-585.

Fox, R. A. and E. Jacewicz. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126. 2603-2618. doi:10.1121/1.3212921

Flege, J. E. 1987. The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics 15. 47-65.

Flege, J. E. 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues, 233-277. Timonium, MD: York Press.

Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. and R. Święciński. 2010. Clashes with ashes. In E. Waniek- Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in Accents of English 2, 213-232. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hawkins, S. and J. Midgley. 2005. Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35/2. 183-199.

Hillenbrand, J. 2013. Static and dynamic approaches to vowel perception. In G. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change, 9-30. Berlin: Springer.

Jekiel, M. 2010. Dynamic information for Polish and English vowels in syllable onsets and offsets. Unpublished B.A. thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.

Jenkins, J. J. and W. Strange. 1999. Perception of dynamic information for vowels in syllable onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics 61. 1200-1210.

Jin, S. H. and C. Liu. 2013. The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (5). 363-369. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4798620.

Kaźmierski, K. 2014. Are some languages more prone to vowel shifting than others? Paper delivered at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea September 11-14 2014, Poznań.

Labov, W., S. Ash and C. Boberg. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology, and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lass, N. 1996. Principles of Experimental Phonetics. St. Louis: Mosby.

Laver, J. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ladefoged, P., 1999. American English. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 41-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lindblom, B. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the HandH theory. In W. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, 403-439. The Netherlands: Kluver Academic.

Kaźmierski, K. 2015. Vowel-shifting in the English language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Malisz, Z. 2013. Speech rhythm variability in Polish and English - a study of variability in rhythmic levels. PhD dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Morrison, G. 2013. Theories of Vowel Inherent Spectral Change. In G. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change, 31-48. Berlin: Springer.

Morrison, G and P. Assmann (eds.). 2013. Vowel inherent spectral change. Berlin: Springer.

Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73. 265-292.

Rogers, C. L., M. Glasbrenner, T. DeMasi and M. Bianchi. 2013. Vowel inherent spectral change and the second language learner. In G. S. Morrison and P. Assmann (eds.), Vowel Inherent Spectral Change, Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing, 231-259. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Rojczyk, A. 2011. Overreliance on duration in nonnative vowel production and perception: The within lax vowel category contrast. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul and K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010, vol. 2, 239-249. Bern: Peter Lang.

Schwartz, G. 2010. Rhythm and vowel quality in accents of English. Research in Language 8. 135-147.

Schwartz, G. 2013. A representational parameter for onsetless syllables. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 613-646.

Schwartz, G. 2015. Vowel dynamics for Polish learners of English. In: E. Waniek-Klimczak and M. Pawlak (eds.), Teaching and Researching the Pronunciation of English - Studies in Honour of Włodzimierz Sobkowiak, 205-217. Berlin: Springer.

Schwartz, G. 2016. On the evolution of prosodic boundaries - parameter settings for Polish and English. Lingua 171. 37-73.

Schwartz, G. and G. Aperliński. 2014. The phonology of CV transitions. In E. Cyran and J. Szpyra-Kozłowska (eds.), Crossing Phonetics-Phonology Lines, 277-298. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Schwartz, G., Aperliński, G., Jekiel, M. and K. Malarski 2015. Spectral dynamics in L1 and L2 vowel perception. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Native and Nonnative Accents of English, Accents 2015, University of Łodź.

Schwartz, G., Balas, A. and A. Rojczyk. 2014. Stop release in Polish English - implications for prosodic constituency. Research in Language 12(2). 131-144.

Strange, W. 1989. Evolving theories of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85. 2081- 2087.

Strange, W., Jenkins, J. and T. Johnson. 1983. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34. 695-705.

Syrdal, A. and H. S. Gopal. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 79(4). 1086-1100.

Święciński, R. 2004. Articulatory setting in Polish and its implications for teaching English pronunciation to Poles. In W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Zeszyt Naukowy Instytutu Neofilologii Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej w Koninie nr 3, 141-150. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ w Koninie.

Wagner, P. 2007. Visualising levels of rhythmic organization. Proceedings of ICPhS XVI. Saarbrucken.

Weckwerth J. 2011. English TRAP vowel in advanced Polish learners: Variation and system typology. In W.-S. Lee and E. Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2110-2113. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.

Williams, D. and P. Escudero. 2014. A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(5). 2751-2761.

White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Calibrating rhythm - first and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics 35. 501-522.

Research in Language

The Journal of University of Lodz

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.229


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 205 172 9
PDF Downloads 100 97 9