Learner Perspective on English Pronunciation Teaching in an EFL Context

Open access


This paper reports on an interview study with EFL learners that aimed to explore learners’ perceptions and views on English pronunciation teaching. The participants of the present study were ten EFL learners studying in the public educational system of Finland. Six of the participants were pupils attending basic education class nine, i.e. 15- to 16-year-old lower secondary level pupils. Two were primary level pupils attending basic education class four (aged 10), and two were upper secondary school pupils (aged 18). The interviews were thematic, and the learners were encouraged to speak freely about the English pronunciation teaching they were receiving and their opinions on this. In addition, they were asked to discuss their goals in English pronunciation, and to consider their pronunciation learning in class and out of class. The interviews were part of a wider study, mapping English pronunciation teaching practices in the context of Finnish schools.

On the basis of the findings, the learners do not seem to have aspirations to native-like pronunciation, but rather aim at achieving intelligible and fluent speech. Only few reported an accent preference (British or American). The primary level learners expressed satisfaction with the amount of pronunciation teaching, whereas most of the lower and upper secondary level learners claimed that pronunciation teaching was insufficient. Despite their criticisms of their pronunciation teaching, the learners reported that they had learnt English pronunciation at school. In addition, many of the learners described learning pronunciation outside school, e.g. through media and personal encounters.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Breitkreutz J.A. T.M. Derwing & M.J. Rossiter 2001. Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal 19 (1) 51-61.

  • Burgess J. & S. Spencer 2000. Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System 28 (2) 191-215.

  • Celce-Murcia M. D.M. Brinton J.M. Goodwin & B. Griner 2010. TeachingPronunciation. A Course Book and Reference Guide. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cenoz J.M. & L. Garcia Lecumberri 1999. The Acquisition of English Pronunciation: Learners‘ Views. The International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9 (1) 3-17.

  • Cunningham U. 2009. Models and Targets for Pronunciation of English in Vietnam and Sweden. Research in Language 7 (1) 113-128.

  • Cunningsworth A. 1984. Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heineman Educational Books.

  • Dalton-Puffer C. G. Kaltenboeck & U. Smit 1997. Learner Attitudes and L2 Pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16 115-127.

  • Denzin N.K. 1978. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociologicalmethods. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Derwing T.M. 2003. What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian ModernLanguage Review 59 547-567.

  • Finnish National Board of Education. 2004. National Core Curriculum for BasicEducation. Helsinki: Author. Available at http://www.oph.fi/english/sources_of_information/core_curricula_and_qualification_requirements/basic_education. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]

  • Fontana A. & A.H. Prokos 2007. The Interview: From Formal to Postmodern. Walnut Creek CA: Left Coast Press.

  • Foote J.A. A.K. Holtby & T.M. Derwing 2011. Survey of the Teaching of Pronunciation in Adult ESL Programs in Canada 2010. TESL Canada 29 (1) 1-22.

  • Fraser H. 2000. Coordinating Improvements in Pronunciation Teaching for AdultLearners of English as a Second Language. Canberra: DETYA.

  • Gilbert J.B. 2010. Pronunciation as orphan: What can be done? As We Speak Newsletterof SPLIS 2010.

  • Henderson A. D. Frost E. Tergujeff A. Kautzsch D. Murphy A. Kirkova-Naskova E.

  • Waniek-Klimczak D. Levey U. Cunningham & L. Curnick 2012. The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey: Selected results. Research in Language 10.1 5-27.

  • Iivonen A. 2005. Fonetiikan merkitys kielenomaksumisessa ja -opetuksessa. In A.

  • Iivonen R. Aulanko & M. Vainio (eds.) Monikäyttöinen fonetiikka. Mimeographed series of the Department of Phonetics 21 University of Helsinki. 3 edition.

  • Janicka K. M. Kul & J. Weckwerth 2005. Polish Students’ Attitudes to Native English Accents as Models for EFL Pronunciation. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (eds.) English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 251-292.

  • Jenkins J. 2000. Phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Jones K.W. 2001. "I've Called 'em Tom-ah-toes All My Life and I'm Not Going to Change!": Maintaining Linguistic Control over English Identity in the U.S. SocialForces 79 (3) 1061-1094.

  • Kachru B.B. 1985. Standards codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk and H. Widdowson (eds.) English in theworld: Teaching and learning the language and literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11-36.

  • Kumpulainen T. (ed.) 2010. Koulutuksen määrälliset indikaattorit 2010. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education. Available at http://www.oph.fi/download/130716_Koulutuksen_maaralliset_indikaattorit_2010.pdf. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]

  • Kvale S. 2007. Doing interviews. London: Sage.

  • Leppänen S. A. Pitkänen-Huhta T. Nikula S. Kytölä T. Törmäkangas K. Nissinen L.

  • Kääntä T. Räisänen M. Laitinen P. Pahta H. Koskela S. Lähdesmäki & H.

  • Jousmäki 2011. National Survey on the English Language in Finland: Usesmeanings and attitudes. Studies in Variation Contacts and Change in English Vol. 5. Available at http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/journal/volumes/05. [Retrieved 4 Feb 2013]

  • Lintunen P. 2004. Pronunciation and Phonemic Transcription: A study of advancedFinnish learners of English. Turku: University of Turku.

  • Luukka M-R. S. Pöyhönen A. Huhta P. Taalas M. Tarnanen & A. Keränen 2008. Maailma muuttuu - mitä tekee koulu? Äidinkielen ja vieraiden kieltentekstikäytänteet koulussa ja vapaa-ajalla. University of Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.

  • Macdonald S. 2002. Pronunciation - views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect 17 (3) 3-18.

  • Morley J. 1991. The Pronunciation Component in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. TESOL Quarterly 25 (3) 481-520.

  • Pihko M-K. 1997. His English Sounded Strange. The Intelligibility of Native and Non-Native English Pronunciation to Finnish Learners of English. University of Jyväskylä: Centre for Applied Language Studies.

  • Purcell E.T. & R. W. Suter 1980. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning 30 (2) 271-287.

  • Saito K. 2012. Effects of Instruction on L2 Pronunciation Development: A Synthesis of 15 Quasi-Experimental Intervention Studies. TESOL Quarterly 46 (4) 842-854.

  • Suomi K. J. Toivanen & R. Ylitalo 2008. Finnish sound structure: Phoneticsphonology phonotactics and prosody. Oulu: University of Oulu.

  • Suter R.W. 1976. Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. Language Learning 26 (2) 233-253.

  • Tergujeff E. 2010. Pronunciation teaching materials in Finnish EFL textbooks. In A. Henderson (ed.) English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP): Proceedingsof the First International Conference. June 3-5 2009 Université de SavoieChambéry France. Université de Savoie: Laboratoire LLS. 189-205.

  • Tergujeff E. 2012a. English pronunciation teaching: Four case studies from Finland. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3 (4) 599-607.

  • Tergujeff E. 2012b. The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey: Finland. Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies 6 (1) 29-45.

  • Waniek-Klimczak E. 1997. Context for Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology at Polish Universities and Colleges: A Survey. In Waniek-Klimczak E. (ed.) TeachingEnglish Phonetics and Phonology II. Accents ’97. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. 5-17.

  • Waniek-Klimczak E. & K. Klimczak 2005. Target in Speech Development: Learners’ Views. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (eds.) English PronunciationModels: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang. 229-249.

  • Wells J.C. 1996. Why phonetic transcription is important. Malsori 31-32 239-242.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.471

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 779 411 14
PDF Downloads 623 442 14