The knowledge of the inhabitants of Lesser Poland about the profession of an occupational therapist

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: A contemporary model of occupational therapy differs from the previous model which was common in Poland in previous years. Therefore, the opinions of the society concerning the profession of an occupational therapist are constantly changing. Material and methods: The research included 244 inhabitants of Lesser Poland aged between 25 and 65 employed in various professions. A questionnaire regarding occupational therapy and the profession and competences of occupational therapists was applied in the study. Results: The presented results show that the job of an occupational therapist is perceived as a needed profession both by individuals who underwent such therapy and those who did not use such services. Responses regarding competences and activities in the profession of an occupational therapist revealed differences in the opinions of the study participants. Conclusions: Taking into account only competences and activities of an occupational therapist, associations of the study participants reflected the knowledge of the model of therapy that existed before and was mainly devoted to occupational therapy workshops. The respondents would trust an occupational therapist both in adapting the house to their needs and in performing exercises connected with activities of daily living.

1. Bac A. editor. Terapia Zajęciowa. Warszawa: PZWL; 2016.

2. Polatajko HJ, Townsend EA, Craik J. The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E). In: Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision of Health Well-being and Justice through Occupation. Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ Eds. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007:22-36.

3. Bac A, Bednarczuk G, Kulis A, Kucharczyk B. Charakterystyka terapii zajęciowej jako profesji oraz specyfika pracy terapeuty zajęciowego. Post Rehab 2011; 13(2):43-50.

4. Ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 1997 r. o rehabilitacji zawodowej i społecznej oraz zatrudnianiu osób niepełnosprawnych. Dz. U. 1997 nr 123, poz. 776.

5. Iwama MK, Thomson NA, Macdonald RM. The Kawa model: the Power of culturally responsie occupantional therpay. Disability Rehabilitation 2009; 31(14):1125-35.

6. Dukan EAS. editor. Foundations for Practice in Occupational Therapy, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2011: 49-137.

7. Milanowska K. Terapia zajęciowa. Warszawa: PZWL; 1965.

8. Nawrot J. Ergoterapia dziecka upośledzonego fizycznie. Warszawa: PZWL; 1973.

9. Söderback I. Occupantional Therapy: Emphasis on Clinical Practice., London-New York: Springer; 2009:13-38.

10. Law M., Baptiste S., McColl M., Opzoomer A., M.Sc., Polatajko H., Pollock N.: The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An Outcome Measure for Occupational Therapy, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1990; 57: 82-7.

11. Perrin T. Rola terapeuty zajęciowego. Psychiatria 2005: 93-4.

12. Baum E. Terapia Zajęciowa. Warszawa: Fraszka edukacyjna; 2008.

13. Milanowska K. Techniki pracy w terapii zajęciowej. Warszawa: PZWL; 1982.

14. Svestkova O, Svecena K, Formankova P. Is it Occupational therapy important in the process of Rehabilitation? Niepełnosprawność - zagadnienia, problemy, rozwiązania 2014, 3: 59-80.

15. Willard HS, Spackman CS. Occupational Therapy is Art and Science. W: Cohn E, Crepeau EB, Boyt-Schell BA (red.). Willard and Spackmana Occupational Therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott & Wilkins; 2008: 12-27.

Advances in Rehabilitation

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education, Warsaw

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.04

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.104
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.014

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 174 174 28
PDF Downloads 58 58 11