This study is based on the hypothesis that one year of study difference between students underlines different evaluations of the dimensions of commercial presentation websites’ credibility. The objectives of this study are: (-) highlighting significant differences of credibility dimensions evaluation between second and third year of study students; (-) highlighting the dimensions considered to be important by the second year of study students; (-) highlighting the dimensions considered to be important by the third year of study students. For presentation commercial Websites, as approached by this study, second year of study students consider “site-user connection” and “information support” as important dimensions; for the same category of Websites, third year of study students consider “ease of use”, “real world feel” and “site-etiquette” as important dimensions.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Bartlett II J. E. Kotrlik J. W. Higgins C. C. (2001) “Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research” Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 Spring p. 43-50.
2. Bobâlcă C. (2013) “Study Of Customers’ Loyalty: Dimensions And Facets” Revista Management & Markerting Vol. XI Issue 1/2013 Editura Universitatii Craiova p. 104-114.
3. Bobâlcă C. (2014a) “A Romanian Perspective on Customer Loyalty for Direct Selling Companies” CES Working Papers Vol. VI No 3 pp. 6-16 ISSN 2067 -769 http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2014_VI3_BOB.pdf .
4. Bobâlcă C. (2014b) “Gaining insights into factors affecting customer loyalty in direct selling” volumul conferintei International Conference on Marketing Marketing from information to decision Nr 7 Editura RISOPRINT ISSN 2067-0338 pp. 52-68.
5. Bobalca C. Apachitei D.C. Manolica A. Roman T. (2014) “BRAND LOYALTY - A DETERMINANT OF BRAND EQUITY” REVIEW OF ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS STUDIES Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press ISSN 1843-763X VOl. 7 Nr. 2 p.63-84 http://www.rebs.ro/issues/pdfs/14.pdf
6. Bohner G. Einwiller S. Erb H. P. and Siebler F. (2003) „When Small Means Comfortable: Relations Between Product Attributes in Two-Sided Advertising” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(4) 454-463.
7. Chiosa A.R. (2014a) “Word of mouth: de la comunicarea prin viu grai la comunicarea online[Word of mouth: from verbally communication to communication online]” Management Intercultural Vol. XVI Nr. 2(31) 415-420.
9. Ciobanu O. (2011) Aspecte ale evaluarii credibilitatii site-urilor comerciale Tehnopress Iaşi.
10. Ciobanu O. and Bobâlcă C. (2011) „Importance of credibility' s factors - an analysis on a particular category of web sites” Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara Vol. XVII Mirton Timisoara.
11. Chun Ho K. L. (2006) „Perceived Credibility Loneliness and Self-disclosure on Blogs” Diseration thesis Chinese University in Hong Kong coordinator: Prof. Louis Leung.
12. Eisend M. (2006) “Source Credibility Dimensions in Marketing Communication - A Generalized Solution” Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing 10(1) 1-33.
13. Flanagin A.J. and Metzger M.J. (2000) „Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility” Journal of Mass Communication Quarterly 77(3) 515-540.
14. Fogg B.J. and Tseng H. (1999) “The Elements of Computer Credibility” Proceedings of ACM CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York: ACM Press 1999): pp. 80-87.
15. Fogg B. J. Marshall J. Laraki O. Osipovich A. Varma C. Fang N. Paul J. Rangnekar A. Shon J. Swani P. and Treinen M. (2001) “What Makes Web Sites Credible? A Report on a Large Quantitative Study” CHI. Volume No. 3 Issue No. 1.
16. Garrison B. (2003) “The Perceived Credibility of Electronic Mail In Newspaper Newsgathering” Paper presented to the Newspaper Division Conference Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Kansas City Missouri.
17. Hong T. (2006) “The Influence of Structural and Message Features on Web Site Credibility” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 114-127.
18. Kim J.O. and Mueller C.W. (1978) Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical Issues (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Beverly Hills CA and London England: Sage Publications.
19. Manolică A. Ciobanu O. Bobâlcă C. and Sasu C. (2011) „A Method to Asses Credibility of Commercial Web SItes. One level to Change Consumers' Attitude and Behaviour” Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Technological Changes. Democritus University of Thrace Alexandroupolis Greece.
20. Metzger M. J. and Hall E. (2005) “A Review of the State of Our Knowledge and Recommendations for Theory Policy and Practice” Paper presented at the Internet Credibility and the User Symposium sponsored by American Library Association’s Office for Information Technology Policy Seattle WA5.
21.Morrison P. J. (2005) Online source credibility: Experts and fellow users COMM 65020 Kent State University .
22.Munteanu C. Ceobanu C. and Anton O. (2009) “Assessing Marketing Graduates Self-Efficacy: An Exploratory Factor Analysis” Transformation in Business & Economics Vol. 8 Nr. 3 (18) Supplement A.
23. Raven Matt R. (1994) “The Application of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Agricultural Education Research” Journal of Agricultural Education Volume 35 No. 4 pp. 9-14.
24. Savolainen R. (2007) „Media credibility and cognitive authority. The case of seeking orienting information” Information Research 12(3) paper 319.
25. Trifts V. and Häubl G. (2003) „Information Availability and Consumer Preference:Can Online Retailers Benefit From Providing Access to Competitor Price Information?” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1&2) 149-159.
26. Ţugulea O. (2015) „Different Year of Study Different Important Credibility Dimensions? A Study on Online Sales Websites’ Credibility Dimensions” Review of Economic and Business Studies (REBS) 14 REBS Volume VII Issue 2 ISSN-1843-763X p. 31-49. http://www.rebs.ro/issues/pdfs/14.pdf .