Central low-grade osteosarcoma with an unusual localization in the diaphysis of a 12-year old patient

Open access

Background. Low-grade central osteosarcoma is a very rare subtype of osteosarcoma with a predilection for the metaphysis of long bones and a peak incidence in the 3rd decade of life. Absence of specific clinical symptoms and a good prognosis after wide resection are the characteristics of this entity. Chemotherapy is not indicated in this highly differentiated tumour.

Case report. A 12-year old girl presented with limping, swelling and pain in the mid of the left femur. Radiography showed a 12 cm long intraosseous expansion with lamellated periosteal reaction and contrast medium enhancement in MRI. Although radiology led to the differential diagnoses of Ewing’s sarcoma, osteomyelitis and fibrous dysplasia, the histological specimen showed a hyopocellular spindle-cell proliferation arranged in fascicles with mild cytologic atypia and only single mitotic figures. In synopsis with radiology the diagnosis of low-grade central osteosarcoma was made and confirmed by reference pathology. The tumour was resected with wide margins and reconstruction was performed with a vascularized fibula, a homologous allograft and a plate. Staging was negative for recurrence and metastasis at a follow-up of 16 months.

Conclusions. Low-grade osteosarcoma accounts for only 1% of all osteosarcomas with a peak incidence in the 3rd decade. The diaphyseal localization and the young age make this case special. To achieve the correct diagnosis of this rare low-grade entity and thereby the adequate treatment, despite a wide range of differential diagnoses, a multidisciplinary approach is essential.

1. Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA. Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004. Cancer 2009; 115: 1531-43.

2. Ostrowski ML, Johnson ME, Smith PD, Chevez- Barrios P, Spjut HJ. Low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma with prominent lymphoid infiltrate. Arch PatholLab Med 2000; 124: 868-71.

3. Ragazzini P, Gamberi G, Benassi MS, Orlando C, Sestini R, Ferrari C, et al. Analysis of SAS gene and CDK4 and MDM2 proteins in low-grade osteosarcoma. Cancer Detect Prev 1999; 23: 129-36.

4. Ellis JH, Siegel CL, Martel W, Weatherbee L, Dorfman H. Radiologic features of well-differentiated osteosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 739-42.

5. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Fabbri N, Mercuri M, Picci P, Ruggieri, et al. Osteosarcoma. Cancer 1993; 71: 338-45.

6. Kenan S, Ginat DT, Steiner GC. Dedifferentiated high-grade osteosarcoma originating from low-grade central osteosarcoma of the fibula. SkeletalRadiol 2007; 36: 347-51.

7. Kurt AM, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ. Low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma. Cancer 1990; 65: 1418-28.

8. Klein MJ, Siegal GP. Osteosarcoma Anatomic and Histologic Variants. Am JClin Pathol 2006; 125: 555-81.

9. Hauptmann K, Melcher I, Schaser KD. Differential diagnosis of intramedullary osteosarcomas. Pathologe 2008; 29(Suppl 2): 240-4.

10. Andresen KJ, Sundaram M, Unni KK, Sim FH. Imaging features of low-grade central osteosarcoma of the long bones and pelvis. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 373-9.

11. Chapurlat RD, Orcel P. Fibrous dysplasia of bone and McCune-Albright syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008; 22: 55-69.

12. Bonar SF. Central low-grade osteosarcoma: a diagnostic challenge. SkeletalRadiol 2012; 41: 365-7.

Radiology and Oncology

The Journal of Association of Radiology and Oncology

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.722
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.729

CiteScore 2017: 1.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.574
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.814


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 91 91 7
PDF Downloads 35 35 4