Dosimetric verification of compensated beams using radiographic film

Slaven Jurkovic 1 , Gordana Zauhar 2 , Dario Faj 3 , Deni Radojcic 1 , Manda Svabic 1 , Mladen Kasabasic 3 , and Ana Diklic 1
  • 1 Radiotherapy Department, Physics Division, University Hospital Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
  • 2 Department of Physics, School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia
  • 3 Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Dosimetric verification of compensated beams using radiographic film

Introduction. External photon beam modulation using compensators in order to achieve a desired dose distribution when brachytherapy treatment is followed by external beam radiation is a well-established technique. A compensator modulates the central part of the beam, and the dose beneath the thickest part of the compensator is delivered mostly by scattered, low energy photons. A two-dimensional detector with a good spatial resolution is needed for the verification of those beams. In this work, the influence of different types of detectors on the measured modulated dose distributions was examined.

Materials and methods. Dosimetric verification was performed using X-Omat V, Eastman Kodak radiographic films at different depths in a solid water phantom. The film measurements were compared with those made by ionization chambers. Photon beams were also modelled using EGSnrc Monte Carlo algorithm to explain the measured results.

Results. Monte Carlo calculated over-response of the film under the thickest part of the compensator was over 15%, which was confirmed by measurements. The magnitude of over-response could be associated with changes in the spectra of photon energy in the beam.

Conclusions. The radiographic film can be used for the dosimetry of compensated high energy photon beams, with limitations in volumes where photon spectra are hardly degraded.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Han IH, Malviya V, Chuba P, Orton CG, Devi S, Deppe G, et al. Multifractioned HDR brachytherapy with concomitant daily teletherapy for cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 1996; 63: 71-7.

  • Popple RA, Kim RY, Pareek P, Duan J, Shen S, Brezovich IA. Custom step wedge blocking using dynamic multileaf collimation for parametrial pelvic boost irradiation following brachytherapy carcinoma of the cervix. Med Phys 2003; 30: 2699-702.

  • Jurković S, Žauhar G, Bistrović M, Faj D, Kaliman Z, Smilović Radojčić D. An alternative approach to compensators design for photon beams used in radiotherapy. Nucl Instrum Methods A 2007; 580: 530-3.

  • Jurković S, Žauhar G, Faj D, Smilović Radojčić Đ, Švabić M, Radiation therapy photon beams dose conformation according to dose distribution around intracavitary applied brachytherapy sources. Med Dos 2010; 35: 49-52.

  • Bucciolini M, Banci F, Casati M. Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry. Med Phys 2004; 31: 161-8.

  • Bailey DW, Kumaraswamy L, Podgorsak MB. A fully electronic intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) process implemented in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify, and delivery systems. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 124-30.

  • Salz H, Wiezorek T, Scheithauer M, Schwedas M, Beck J, Wendt TG. IMRT with Compensators for Head-and-Neck Cancers. Strahlenter Onkol 2005; 181: 665-72.

  • Srivastava RP, Wagter De C. The value of EDR2 film dosimetry in compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 449-57.

  • Brahme A, Andreo P. Dosimetry and quality specification of high energy photon beams. Acta Rad Onc 1986; 25: 213-23.

  • Seltzer SM. Calculation of photon mass energy-transfer and mass energy-absorption coefficients. Radiat Res 1993; 136: 147-70.

  • Yeo IJ, Wang CC, Burch SE. A filtration method for improving film dosimetry in photon radiation therapy. Med Phys 1997; 24: 1943-53.

  • Wang X, Spirou S, Lo Sasso T, Stein J, Chui C, Mohan R. Dosimetric verification of intensity-modulated fields. Med Phys 1996; 23: 317-27.

  • Ju SG, Ahn YC, Huh SJ, Yeo IJ. Film dosimetry for intensity modulated radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation. Med Phys 2002; 29: 351-55.

  • Rogers DWO, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, We J, Mackie TR. BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 1995; 22: 503-24.

  • Bielayew AF, Rogers DWO. PRESTA: the parameter reduced electron-step transport algorithm for electron Monte Carlo transport. Nucl Instrum Methods B 1987; 18: 165-81.

  • Ma CM, Reckwerdt P, Holmes M, Rogers DWO, Geiser B. DOSXYZ users manual. National Research, Council of Canada Report PIRS-0509B; 1995.

  • Lin SY, Chu TC, Lin JP. Monte Carlo simulation of a clinical linear accelerator. App Rad Isotopes 2001; 55: 759-65.

  • Faj D, Vrtar M, Krajina Z, Jurković S, Margaretić D. Model of total skin electron treatment using the ‘six-dual-field’ technique. Coll Antropol 2003; 27: 713-21.

  • Verhaegen F, Seuntjens J. Monte Carlo modeling of external radiotherapy photon beams. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: R107-64.

  • Rivest DRC, Riauka TA, Murtha AD, Fallone BG. Dosimetric implications of two registration based patient positioning methods in prostate image guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Radiol Oncol 2009; 43: 203-12.

  • Mesbahia A, Reillyb AJ, Thwaites DI. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for Varian Clinac 2100EX linear accelerator. Applied Radiation 2006; 64: 656-62.

  • Ting JY, Davis L. Dose verification for patients undergoing IMRT. Med Dosim 2001; 26: 205-13.


Journal + Issues