Pipette tip with integrated electrodes for gene electrotransfer of cells in suspension: a feasibility study in CHO cells

Open access

Pipette tip with integrated electrodes for gene electrotransfer of cells in suspension: a feasibility study in CHO cells

Background. Gene electrotransfer is a non-viral gene delivery method that requires successful electroporation for DNA delivery into the cells. Changing the direction of the electric field during the pulse application improves the efficacy of gene delivery. In our study, we tested a pipette tip with integrated electrodes that enables changing the direction of the electric field for electroporation of cell suspension for gene electrotransfer.

Materials and methods. A new pipette tip consists of four cylindrical rod electrodes that allow the application of electric pulses in different electric field directions. The experiments were performed on cell suspension of CHO cells in phosphate buffer. Plasmid DNA encoding for green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used and the efficiency of gene electrotransfer was determined by counting cells expressing GFP 24 h after the experiment.

Results. Experimental results showed that the percentage of cells expressing GFP increased when the electric field orientation was changed during the application. The GFP expression was almost two times higher when the pulses were applied in orthogonal directions in comparison with single direction, while cell viability was not significantly affected.

Conclusions. We can conclude that results obtained with the described pipette tip are comparable to previously published results on gene electrotransfer using similar electrode geometry and electric pulse parameters. The tested pipette tip, however, allows work with small volumes/samples and requires less cell manipulation.

Neumann E, Kakorin S, Toensing K. Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1999; 48: 3-16.

Mir LM. Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 2001; 53: 1-10.

Teissie J, Golzio M, Rols MP. Mechanisms of cell membrane electropermeabilization: A minireview of our present (lack of ?) knowledge. Biochim Biophys Acta-General Subjects 2005; 1724: 270-80.

Teissie J, Escoffre JM, Rols MP, Golzio M. Time dependence of electric field effects on cell membranes. A review for a critical selection of pulse duration for therapeutical applications. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 196-206.

Cemazar M, Sersa G. Electrotransfer of therapeutic molecules into tissues. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2007; 9: 554-62.

Mir LM. Nucleic acids electrotransfer-based gene therapy (electrogenetherapy): past, current, and future. Mol Biotechnol 2009; 43: 167-76.

Kanduser M, Miklavcic D, Pavlin M. Mechanisms involved in gene electrotransfer using high- and low-voltage pulses - An in vitro study. Bioelectrochemistry 2009; 74: 265-71.

Gresch O, Engel FB, Nesic D, Tran TT, England HM, Hickman ES, et al. New non-viral method for gene transfer into primary cells. Methods 2004; 33: 151-63.

Thomas CE, Ehrhardt A, Kay MA. Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy. Nature Rev Genet 2003; 4: 346-58.

Wells DJ. Electroporation and ultrasound enhanced non-viral gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Cell Biol Toxicol 2010; 26: 21-8.

Haberl S, Pavlin M. Use of collagen gel as a three-dimensional in vitro model to study electropermeabilization and gene electrotransfer. J Membrane Biol 2010; 236: 87-95.

Ferber D. Gene therapy: Safer and virus-free? Science 2001; 294: 1638-42.

Prud'homme GJ, Glinka Y, Khan AS, Draghia-Akli R. Electroporation-enhanced nonviral gene transfer for the prevention or treatment of immunological, endocrine and neoplastic diseases. Curr Gene Ther 2006; 6: 243-73.

Daud AI, DeConti RC, Andrews S, Urbas P, Riker AI, Sondak VK, et al. Phase I trial of interleukin-12 plasmid electroporation in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 5896-903.

Tevz G, Kranjc S, Cemazar M, Kamensek U, Coer A, Krzan M, et al. Controlled systemic release of interleukin-12 after gene electrotransfer to muscle for cancer gene therapy alone or in combination with ionizing radiation in murine sarcomas. J Gene Med 2009; 11: 1125-37.16.

Pavlin D, Cemazar M, Coer A, Sersa G, Pogacnik A, Tozon N. Electrogene therapy with interleukin-12 in canine mast cell tumors. Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 30-9.

Cemazar M, Golzio M, Sersa G, Rols MP, Teissie J. Electrically-assisted nucleic acids delivery to tissues in vivo: Where do we stand? Curr Pharm Des 2006; 12: 3817-25.

Cao F, Xie XY, Gollan T, Zhao L, Narsinh K, Lee RJ, Wu JC. Comparison of gene-transfer efficiency in human embryonic stem cells. Mol Imaging Biol 2010; 12: 15-24.

Maurisse R, De Semir D, Emamekhoo H, Bedayat B, Abdolmohammadi A, Parsi H, et al. Comparative transfection of DNA into primary and transformed mammalian cells from different lineages. BMC Biotechnol 2010; 10: 9.

Golzio M, Teissie J, Rols MP. Direct visualization at the single-cell level of electrically mediated gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1292-7.

Faurie C, Phez E, Golzio M, Vossen C, Lesbordes JC, Delteil C, et al. Effect of electric field vectoriality on electrically mediated gene delivery in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta-Biomembr 2004; 1665: 92-100.

Rebersek M, Faurie C, Kanduser M, Corovic S, Teissie J, Rols MP, et al. Electroporator with automatic change of electric field direction improves gene electrotransfer in-vitro. Biomed Eng Online 2007; 6: 25.

Wasungu L, Escoffre J-M, Valette A, Teissie J, Rols M-P. A 3D in vitro spheroid model as a way to study the mechanisms of electroporation. Int J Pharm 2009; 379: 278-84.

Wang J, Zhan Y, Ugaz VM, Lu C. Vortex-assisted DNA delivery. Lab Chip 2010; 10: 2057-61.

Rebersek M, Corovic S, Sersa G, Miklavcic D. Electrode commutation sequence for honeycomb arrangement of electrodes in electrochemotherapy and corresponding electric field distribution. Bioelectrochemistry 2008; 74: 26-31.

Faurie C, Rebersek M, Golzio M, Kanduser M, Escoffre JM, Pavlin M, et al. Electro-mediated gene transfer and expression are controlled by the life-time of DNA/membrane complex formation. J Gene Med 2010; 12: 117-25.

Radiology and Oncology

The Journal of Association of Radiology and Oncology

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.722
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.729

CiteScore 2017: 1.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.574
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.814


Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 15
PDF Downloads 9 9 3