What is the most common mammographic appearance of T1a and T1b invasive breast cancer?
Background. Data about the mammographic appearance of breast cancer smaller than 10 mm are very limited and different authors use different mammographic criteria. The aim of this study was to determine the most common mammographic appearance of small invasive breast cancers (T1a and T1b).
Patients and methods. The study group consisted of 100 women with 102 small (1-10 mm) invasive breast cancers detected on mammography at a single institution in 16 months period. The mammographic appearance of tumours was classified as: mass, mass with associated calcifications, only calcifications or others (asymmetric density and architectural distortion).
Results. The most common mammographic appearance was a mass without calcifications (60/102; 59%). Additional 12/102 (11%) tumours had a mammographic appearance of a mass with associated calcifications. Only microcalcifications were detected in 12 (11 %) and asymmetric density and architectural distortion in 18 breast cancers (18 %). Most (44/60) cancers which presented mammographically as a mass had stellate margins. The proportion of castig type calcifications was higher in women under 50 years.
Conclusions: The most common mammographic finding of small breast cancer is a mass with stellate margins independent of the age of patients. Calcifications with/without mass are more common in woman under 50 years.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Primic Zakelj M. Cancer incidence in Slovenia 2005. Ljubljana: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Cancer Registry of Slovenia; 2008.
Fletcher SW Elmore JG. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1672-80.
Leitch AM Dodd GD Costanza M Linver M Pressman P McGinnis L et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 150-3.
Tabar L Vitak B Chen HH Prevost TC Duffy SW. Update of the Swedish Two-County Trial of breast cancer screening: histologic grade-specific and age-specific results. Swiss Surg 1999; 5: 199-204.
Barth RJ Jr. Gibson GR Carney PA Mott LA Becher RD Poplack SP. Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 324-9.
Tabar L Tony Chen HH Amy Yen MF Tot T Tung TH Chen LS et al. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101: 1745-59.
Rissanen TJ Makarainen HP Mattila SI Karttunen AI Kiviniemi HO Kallioinen MJ et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 14-22.
Obenauer S Hermann KP Grabbe E. Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1027-36.
Kocijancic I Rener M Vidmar K. Simultaneous occurence of fat necrosis and carcinoma after breast injury in a traffic accident. Eur J Ultrasound 2000; 11: 213-6.
Burrell HC Pinder SE Wilson AR Evans AJ Yeoman LJ Elston CW et al. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 277-81.
Franceschi D Crowe JP Lie S Duchesneau R Zollinger R Shenk R et al. Not all nonpalpable breast cancers are alike. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 967-70.
Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146: 661-3.
Thurfjell MG Lindgren A Thurfjell E. Nonpalpable breast cancer: mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type. Radiology 2002; 222: 165-70.
Tinnemans JG Wobbes T Holland R Hendriks JH Van der Sluis RF Lubbers EJ et al. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 165: 523-9.
Samardar P de Paredes ES Grimes MM Wilson JD. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2002; 22: 19-33.