The paper examined the dialectics and the Philosophical Theorization of the Phenomenon of Industrial design viz-a-viz meta-design, both as new areas of the philosophical discourse and intellectualization of both fields. This is not only as new subject disciplines / profession but also as New/Novel, and “uncharted waters” in the study and philosophy of both. Which is aimed at their adoption as a veritable tool and vehicle, for achieving New and innovative franchises and enterprises that might thus help bring about creating potentially New Design paradigms. In the body of the text it was established that by employing interdisciplinarity and collaborative efforts / approaches, designers try to achieve these New design efforts which are inspired by the way living organisms, systems and mechanisms, function and work. This eventually will influence, change or completely overhaul the way we feed, cloth ourselves, shelter, communicate or even co-habit in the future. The paper also established that the implications of the above will help engender a new narrative in the discussions and reasoning (or the dialectics) of these two disciplines and also of how they will affect the subjects practice and the various attempts aimed at its Pedagogy /Education. It was also established that the nature of such an Education and the Impartation of the adequate Design skills to graduates must adopt New strategies and implementation of an Industrial/Technological-based subject-Bias that leans towards Design intuitiveness, ingenious Technical/Technologically result oriented reasoning and practices. Bearing in mind the infusion also of various multidisciphinary subject areas that will help broaden the learner’s horizon. The paper recommends that the issue of the Dialectics and phenomenology of Industrial Design/Meta design (which is the philosophical study of the structure and makeup (or consciousness) of the concepts, context and content of industrial design) must be embedded in the implementation of the three conceptual Approaches of Design which are:-Design Awareness, Design Activity and Design Manufacture/fabrication. This is the sum total of all Design and Creative endeavours.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Adler M.J. (2000) “Dialectics” Routledge Press London
2. Ayer. A. J. (1984) “Philosophy in the Twentieth Century”. London: Unwin paperbacks Pub.
3. Bertell O & Tony S. (2008) “Dialectics for the New Century” London. England Palgrave Macmillan Pub.
4. Donald L. (2003) (Eng. Trans.) “Phenomenology of Perception:- Maurice Ponty” London Routledge Press.
5. Evan T. (2007) “Autopoiesis: The organization of the living”: Mind in life: Biology Phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Harvard Univ. Press Boston USA.
6. Fisher G. & Giaccardi E. (2006) “Metadesign”. A Framework for the Future of End use development”. In Lieberman F.P & Wulf. V. (eds.) Kluwer Acad. Pub. Dordrecht. Netherlands.
7. Giaccardi E (2003) “Principles of Metadesign: Processes and levels of Cocreation in the New design space. Kluwer Acad. Publishers. Dordrecht. Netherlands.
8. Goosseff K. A. (2010). Autopoiesis and Meaning: A biological approach to Bakhtins super addressee. Journal of Organizational Change Management University of Boston Press. Massachusetts. USA.
9. Hiesinger K.B & Marcus G. H (1993). “Landmarks of Twentieth century Designs” New York. Abbeville Press.
10. Howard L. I. W. (1989) “Hegel Heraclitus and Marxs Dialetic”. Harvester wheat sheaf Pub.London.
11. Ira G. (1986) “Dialectical materialism”: Its Laws Categories and Practice Petras Press NY. New York.
12. Kimbell R. (2005) “Assessing Design innovation in Technology Education in New Perspectives Research Assessment and Curriculum development (eds) Lars Lindstrom Vol 17. Stockholm Inst. Of Ed Press/pub
13. Livingston N. (1990) “Between Science and Literature”: An Introduction to Autopoietics. Univ of Illinois Press. Illinois. USA.
14. Lucie-Smith E. (2001) “History of Industrial Design” Oxford. Phaidon Press. UK.
15. Michel H. (2008) “Material Phenomenology”. Fordham University Press. New York.
16. Mitchel C. T. (1993) “Redefining Designing” New York Van Nostrand Reinhold Pub.
17. Noblet J. (ed) (1993) “Industrial Design: Reflection of a century”. Flammarion /APCI. Pub. Paris.
18. O’Brien J. Millis B. Cohen M. (2008) “The Design Education course Syllabus”. San Francisco: Wiley and Sons pub.
19. Petroski H. (1994) “Design paradigms; case Histories of Error and Judgement” in Eng. Design. Newtown Press. N. Jersey USA.
20. Pierre T (1962) “What is phenomenology” Chicago Quadrangle Books.
21. Smith D. W. & Thomasson A. L. (2005) (eds) “Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind” New York Oxford University Press.
22. Spramzi M. (2011) “The Art of Dialectics between Dialogue and Rhetoric” The Aristotelian Tradition Philadelphia USA John Benjamin’s Pub.
23. Vassao C. A. (2010) “Metadesign tools Strategies and ethics towards complexity” Blutcher Pub. Sao Paulo. Briazil.
24. Wake W. (2000) “Design paradigms”. A source book for creative visualization. Adwark pub. London.
25. Walker A.J. (1989) “Design History and History of Design” London. Pluto Press.
26. Wood J. (2007) “Win-win: synergy tools for metadesigners”. In Designing for the 21st Century Interdisciplinary questions and insights. (Ed.) Thomas Inns. Gower Pub. London.