Analyst vs Performer. The Importance of Studying The Music Analysis Discipline for The Development of Critical-Analytical Thinking of Perfomer Students

Open access


In the music higher education, the appearance of a concept of incompatibility between the performance practice and the studentsʼ theoretical and analytical training is a phenomenon with multiple consequences on their training, on the way of organizing a curriculum and a hierarchical deformed attitude on the different subjects in the curriculum.This study summarizes some of the arguments that emphasize the role played by the study of the Music Analysis in developing the musicianʼs ability to understand music from the perspective of the compositional conception, to discover its importance as a stage in the formation of an original performance concept while highlighting the advantages of a collaborative approach between the two areas of training of the musician.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aiello R. Williamon A. (2002). Memory. In R. Parncutt &G.McPherson (Eds.) The Science and psychology of music performance:Creative strategies for teaching and learning (167-181). Oxford:Oxford University Press

  • 2. Bowen J.A. (1993). The History of Remembered Innovation: Tradition and its Role in the Relationship between Musical Works and Their Performances. The Journal of Musicology11(2) 139-173

  • 3. Bowen J.A. (1996). Performance Practice Versus Performance Analysis: Why Should Performers Study Performance Performance Practice Review9(1) DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199609.01.03

  • 4. Cook N. (1999). Analysing Performance and Performing Analysis in Cook N. & Everist M. (1999). Rethinking Music Oxford: Oxford University Press 239-261

  • 5. Cook N. (2001). Product or Process? Music and Performance Music Theory Online 7 (

  • 6. Dunsby J. (1995). Performing Music: Shared Concerns Clarendon Press Oxford

  • 7. Howell T. (1992) Analysis and Performance: The Search for a Middleground in Paynter J. (ed.) Companion to Contemporary Musical Thought London: Routledge

  • 8. Lester J. (1995). Performance and analysis: interaction and interpretation in Rink J. (ed.) The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation Cambridge University Press 187-216

  • 9. Lester J. (1998). How theorists relate to musicians Music Theory Online4(2)

  • 10. Narmour E. & Solie R. (1988). On the Relationship of Analytical Theory to Performance and Interpretation in Meyer L.B. Narmour E. & Solie R. (Eds.) Explorations in Music the Arts and Ideas: Essays in Honor of Leonard B. Meyer Pendragon Press Hillsdale New York

  • 11. Rosenwald L. (1993). Theory Text-Setting and Performance The Journal of Musicology11(1) University of California Press 52-65

  • 12. Rothstein W. (1995) Analysis and the Act of Performance in Rink J. (ed.) The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation Cambridge University Press 217-240.

  • 13. Tovey D.F. (1931). Companion to Beethovenʼs Pianoforte Sonatas London: Associated Board of the Royal School fo Music

  • 14. Ward V. (2007). Teaching Musical Awareness: The development and application of a ‘toolkit’ of strategies for instrumental teachers British Journal of Music Education24(01) 21-36 DOI: 10.1017/S0265051706007200

  • 15. Ward V. (2004). The performance teacher as music analyst: a case study International Journal of Music Education22(3) 248-265 DOI: 10.1177/0255761404047406

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 93 93 5
PDF Downloads 86 86 2