The intent to structure valuable learning experiences, focusing on student-teachers’ exercise of pedagogical creativity and informed critical reasoning, may prove particularly challenging in the current national curriculum for pre-service teacher education. It is proposed here a reflective view of the challenges to arts pre-service student-teachers understandings of concepts and processes related to curriculum development; findings of previous empirical exploratory research questioning student-teachers conceptions of learning, and identity issues related to induction practices drawing heavily on apprenticeship models of learning feed into the proposed analysis. It is concluded on possible conceptual and methodological shifts towards understanding learning in teacher education.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Anderson J. R. Greeno J. G. Reder L. M. & Simon H. E. (2000). Perspectives on learning thinking and activity. Educational Researcher29(4) 11–13
2. Borko H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher33(8) 3–15
3. Borko H. & Putnam R. (1997). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York NY: Macmillan
4. Collins S. & Clarke A. (2008). Activity frames and complexity thinking: Honouring both public and personal agendas in an emergent curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education24 1003–1014
5. Davis B. & Sumara D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning teaching and research. London UK: Lawrence Erlbaum
6. Day C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London UK: Falmer
7. Doll W. E. J. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York NY: Teachers College Press
8. Hanushek E. A. (2005). Economic outcomes and school quality: Education policy series. Paris France: International Institute for Educational Planning and International Academy of Education
9. Lave J. & Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
10. Opfer V.D. Pedder D. (2011). Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning Review of Educational Research 81: 3 376–407
11. Timperley H. & Alton-Lee A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: An alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education32 328–369