The study examines yes/no questions in the Ẹ́dó language with the aim of identifying the morphemes that function as yes/no question markers. Relying on primary data generated from a survey, the study proposes that there are five overt yes/no question markers in the language. Four of these question markers (té, yí, rà, and kué) have been discussed in the literature, but this study provides a different account of the role of té in polar questions, and suggests that another morpheme, i.e., nè can be classified as a yes/no question marker. Furthermore, the study reveals that the question markers are homonyms of other lexical and functional words. This has implications for the distribution of the question markers, as the co-occurrence with their homonyms yields unacceptable sentences. The paper describes this constraint on the use of the markers within the framework of Distributed Morphology.
Chomsky, N. (1978). Topics in the theory of generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Déprez, V., Syrett, K., and Kawahara, S. (2013). The interaction of syntax, prosody, and discourse in licensing French wh-in-situ questions. Lingua, 124, 4-19.
Ginsburg, J. (2009). Interrogative features. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson.
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. In A. Carnie and H. Harley (Eds.), Papers on Phonology and Morphology. MITWPL, 21, 275-288.
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kinyalolo, K. (1991). Syntactic dependencies and the spec-head agreement hypothesis in Kilega. (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
Kügler, F. (2003). Do we know the answer? – Variation in yes-no-question intonation. In S. Fischer, R. Van de Vijver, and R. Vogel (Eds.), Linguistics in Potsdam: Experimental Studies in Linguistics, 1(21), 9-29.