What can psycholinguistic research on word class ambiguities tell us about categories?

Joanna Błaszczak 1  and Dorota Klimek-Jankowska 1
  • 1 University of Wrocław Institute of English Studies ul. Kuźnicza 22 50-138 Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

This paper is a contribution to a long-standing debate between constructionist, lexicalist, and emergentist schools of thought related to the question of what determines the category of lexically ambiguous words whose meanings belong to different syntactic categories (e.g., duck, walk). In the lexicalist view part-of-speech information is stored in the mental lexicon. According to the syntax-first (or constructionist) view, the ambiguous word is assigned to the syntactic category NOUN or VERB solely on the basis of the morphosyntactic frame in which it occurs irrespective of its meaning. In contrast, the emergentist view assumes an interaction of many constraints (semantic and syntactic) whereby semantic constraints are weaker than syntactic constraints in the resolution of word class ambiguities because while semantic context only favors one of the meanings of ambiguous words but does not exclude the competitors, syntactic context supports one meaning of an ambiguous word by ruling out its alternative interpretation. We intend to provide an overview of recent psycholinguistic studies focusing on the processing of word-class ambiguities in order to show that the syntax-first approach is too restrictive while the emergentist view is too permissive. What seems to be at issue is that when grammatical category-ambiguous words are processed, it is not that all constraints are available at the same time and they compete but rather different sources of information can be predicted to affect the process of lexical disambiguation at different stages during processing.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Błaszczak, J. and Klimek-Jankowska, D. (2015). Noun and verb in the mind. An interdisciplinary approach. In J. Błaszczak, D., Klimek-Jankowska, and K. Migdalski (Eds.), How categorical are categories? New approaches to the old questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective (pp. 75-112). (Studies in Generative Grammar. 122). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.

  • Briggs, P. and Underwood, G. (1982). Phonological coding in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 93-112.

  • Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar (pp. 184-221). Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.

  • Federmeier, K. D., Segal, J. B, Lombozo, T., and Kutas, M. (2000). Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. Brain, 123, 2552-2566.

  • Ferreira, V. S. and Humphreys, K. R. (2001). Syntactic influences on lexical and morphological processing in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 52-80.

  • Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5, 335-339.

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Folk, J. R. and Morris, R. K. (2003). Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution: An eye movement analysis. Memory & Cognition, 31(1), 87-99.

  • Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.

  • Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 9. (pp. 133-177). New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Glaser, W. R. and Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.

  • Kroll, J. F. and Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149-174.

  • La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16, 400-410.

  • Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.

  • Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367.

  • Lupker, S. J. (1988). Picture naming: An investigation of the nature of categorical priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 444-455.

  • MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.

  • Marx, E. (1999). Gender processing in speech production: Evidence from German speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 601-621.

  • McRae, K. and Boisvert, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 558-572.

  • Melinger, A. and Koenig, J.-P. (2007). Part-of-speech persistence: The influence of part-of-speech information on lexical processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 472-489. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, D. E. and Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.

  • Moseley, R. L., Pulvermüller, F., and Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Sensorimotor semantics on the spot: Brain activity dissociates between conceptual categories within 150 ms. Scientific Reports, 3(1928). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.

  • Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner and G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1997). Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 807-828.

  • Rayner, K. and Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the pictureword interference task. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 207-222.

  • Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643-647.

  • Rozwadowska, B. (2012). Neokonstruktywizm na granicy leksykonu i gramatyki. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.), Współczesne językoznawstwo generatywne. Podstawy metodologiczne (pp. 193-214). (Studia z metodologii i filozofii językoznawstwa. 1). Łódź: Katedra Językoznawstwa Angielskiego i Ogólnego, Wydawnictwo Primum Verbum.

  • Shelton, J. R. and Martin, R. C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1191-1210.

  • Tabor, W. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 491-515.

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 8, 513-520.

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., and Seidenberg, M. A. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18, 427-440.

  • Trueswell, J. C. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, and K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 327-338.

  • Underwood, G. and Briggs, P. (1984). The development of word recognition processes. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 243-255.

  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., and Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 407-426.

  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Indefrey, P., Levelt, W. J. M., and Hellwig, F. (2004). The role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 483-497.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search