The “grammar” in Universal Grammar: A biolinguistic clarification

Open access

Abstract

This short piece addresses the confusion over terminology that has reigned, and partly still reigns, when it comes to the concept of Universal Grammar (UG). It is argued that whilst there might be changes in terminology and theory, conceptually UG cannot be eliminated. From a biolinguistic perspective, UG is not a hypothesis by any rational epistemological standard, but an axiom. Along these lines, the contemporary evolutionary perspective on the language faculty (FL) is briefly discussed to then argue that UG is necessarily part of FL in both a narrow and broad sense. Ultimately, regardless of terminology, UG is inevitably one of the factors determining the growth of FL.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson S. R. and Lightfoot D. W. (2000). The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology62(1) 697-722. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.697

  • Ayoun D. (2005). Parameter setting in language acquisition. London England: Continuum. (Original work published 2003)

  • Benítez-Burraco A. Longa V. M. Lorenzo G. and Uriagereka J. (2008). Also sprach Neanderthalis … Or did she? Biolinguistics2(2-3) 225-232.

  • Boeckx C. (2009). On the nature of Merge. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini P. Salaburu and J. Uriagereka (Eds.) Of minds and language: A Basque encounter with Noam Chomsky (pp. 44-57). Oxford England: Oxford UP.

  • Boeckx C. and Benítez-Burraco A. (2014). The shape of the human language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology5(282). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00282

  • Boeckx C. and Grohmann K. K. (2007). The Biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics1 1-8.

  • Boeckx C. and Leivada E. (2014). On the particulars of Universal Grammar: Implications for acquisition. Language Sciences46 189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.004

  • Boeckx C. and Piattelli-Palmarini M. (2005). Language as a natural object—linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic Review22(2-4) 447-466. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.447

  • Bolender J. (2010a). Universal Grammar as more than a programmatic label. Lingua120(12) 2661-2663. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.010

  • Bolender J. (2010b). The self-organizing social mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Bolhuis J. J. Tattersall I. Chomsky N. and Berwick R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved? PLoS Biology12(8) e1001934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934

  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I. Schlesewsky M. Small S. L. and Rauschecker J. P. (2015a). Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: Common computational properties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(3) 142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.008

  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I. Schlesewsky M. Small S. L. and Rauschecker J. P. (2015b). Response to Skeide and Friederici: The myth of the uniquely human ‘direct’ dorsal pathway. Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(9) 484-485. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.010

  • Cantalupo C. and Hopkins W. D. (2001). Asymmetric Broca’s area in great apes: A region of the ape brain is uncannily similar to one linked with speech in humans. Nature414 505. doi:10.1038/35107134

  • Cantalupo C. Oliver J. Smith J. Nir T. Taglialatela J. P. and Hopkins W. D. (2009). The chimpanzee brain shows human-like perisylvian asymmetries in white matter. European Journal of Neuroscience30(3) 431-438. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06830.x

  • Chomsky N. (1967). Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas. Synthese17(1) 2-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00485013

  • Chomsky N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature origins and use. Westport CT: Praeger.

  • Chomsky N. (1988). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures (5th ed.). Dordrecht Netherlands: Foris. (Original work published 1981)

  • Chomsky N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36(1) 1-22. doi:10.1162/0024389052993655

  • Chomsky N. (2011a). Language and the cognitive science revolution(s). Lecture conducted from Carleton University. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbjVMq0k3uc

  • Chomsky N. (2011b). Language and other cognitive systems: What is special about language? Language Learning and Development7(4) 263-278. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.584041

  • Chomsky N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua130 33-49. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003

  • Comrie B. (1981/1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (2nd ed.). Chicago IL: Chicago UP.

  • Crain S. and Thornton R. (2012). Syntax acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science3(3) 185-203. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1158

  • Dehaene S. and Cohen L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron56(2) 384-398. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004

  • Evans N. and Levinson S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences32 429-492. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X

  • Fedorenko E. Behr M. K. and Kanwisher N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America108(39) 16428-16433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112937108

  • Fisher S. E. Lai C. S. L. and Monaco A. P. (2003). Deciphering the genetic basis of speech and language disorders Annual Review of Neuroscience26 57-80. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131144

  • Fitch W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge England: Cambridge UP.

  • Fitch W. T. Hauser M. D. and Chomsky N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications Cognition97(2) 179-210. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005

  • Gallistel C. R. (2009). The foundational abstractions. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini P. Salaburu and J. Uriagereka (Eds.) Of minds and language: A Basque encounter with Noam Chomsky (pp. 58-73). Oxford England: Oxford UP.

  • Graham S. A. and Fisher S. E. (2013). Decoding the genetics of speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology23(1) 43-51. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.006

  • Greenberg J. H. (1963/1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.) Universals of language: Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry New York April 13-15 1961 (pp. 73-113 2nd ed). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Hauser M. D. and Bever T. (2008). A Biolinguistic agenda. Science322(5904) 1057-1059. doi: 10.1126/science.1167437

  • Hauser M. D. Chomsky N. and Fitch W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it who has it and how did it evolve? Science298(5598) 1569-1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569

  • Hubel D. H. and Wiesel T. N. (1962). Receptive fields binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology160(1) 106-154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837

  • Irurtzun A. (2012). The present of UG. Biolinguistics6(1)112-123.

  • Jacob F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science196(4295) 1161-1166. doi:10.1126/science.860134

  • Kelly C. Uddin L. Q. Shehzad Z. Margulies D. S. Castellanos F. X. Milham M. P. et al. (2010). Broca’s region: Linking human brain functional connectivity data and non-human primate tracing anatomy studies. European Journal of Neuroscience32(3) 383-398. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07279.x

  • Krause J. Lalueza-Fox C. Orlando L. Enard W. Green R. E. Burbano H. A. et al. (2007). The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Current Biology17(21) 1908-1912. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008

  • Lasnik H. and Lohndal T. (2010). Government-binding/principles and parameters theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science1(1) 40-50. doi: 10.1002/wcs.35

  • Levinson S. C. (2014). Language and Wallace’s problem. Science344(6191) 1458-1459. doi:10.1126/science.1252988

  • Lorenzo G. and Longa V. M. (2009). Beyond generative geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view. Lingua119(9) 1300-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.003

  • Ludlow P. (2011). The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford England: Oxford UP.

  • Luef E. M. and Peltzer-Karpf A. (2013) Language acquisition: Ontogenetic and phylogenetic considerations. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development1(2) 10-28.

  • Makuuchi M. Bahlmann J. Anwander A. and Friederici A. D. (2009). Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(20) 8362-8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810928106

  • Marcus G. Marblestone A. and Dean T. (2014 October). The atoms of neural computation. Science346(6209) 551-552. doi: 10.1126/science.1261661

  • Martins P. T. and Boeckx C. (2015). What we talk about when we talk about biolinguistics. (Unpublished manuscript).

  • McGilvray J. (2009) Introduction to Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought by Noam Chomsky (pp. 1-52 3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

  • Miller G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(3) 141-144. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9

  • Moro A. (2008). The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Musso M. Moro A. Glauche V. Rijntjes M. Reichenbach J. Büchel C. and Weiller C. (2003). Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6(7) 774-781. doi: 10.1038/nn1077

  • Petrides M. Cadoret G. and Mackey S. (2005). Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca’s area. Nature435 1235-1238 doi:10.1038/nature03628

  • Piantadosi S. T. and Gibson E. (2014). Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science38(4) 736-756. doi:10.1111/cogs.12088

  • Pinker S. and Bloom P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences13(4) 707-784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061

  • Pinker S. and Jackendoff R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition95(2) 201-236. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004

  • Poeppel D. and Embick D. (2013). Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In A. Cutler (Ed.) Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 103-118). New York NY: Psychology Press. (Original work published 2005)

  • Quian Quiroga R. Reddy L. Kreiman G. Koch C. and Fried I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature435 1102-1107. doi: 10.1038/nature03687

  • Samuels B. D. Hauser M. D. and Boeckx C. (in press). Looking for UG in animals: A case study in phonology. In I. Roberts (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford England: Oxford UP.

  • Skeide M. A. and Friederici A. D. (2015). Response to Bornkessel-Schlesewsky et al.–Towards a nonhuman primate model of language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences19(9) 483. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.011

  • Sklar R. (1968 September). Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. The Nation 213-216.

  • Sterling P. and Laughlin S. (2015). Principles of neural design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Theofanopoulou C. (2015). Brain asymmetry in the white matter making and globularity. Frontiers in Psychology6(1355). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01355

  • Tomasello M. (1990). Grammar yes generative grammar no. Behavioral and Brain Sciences13(4) 759-760. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081334

  • Tomasello M. (2004). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Studies in Language28(3) 642-645. doi:10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom

  • Tomasello M. (2005). Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review22(2-4) 183-197. doi:10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.183

  • Tomasello M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Tomasello M. (2009). Universal Grammar is dead. Behavioral and Brain Sciences32(5) 470-471. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990744

  • Uttal W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Vargha-Khadem F. Gadian D. G. Copp A. and Mishkin M. (2005). FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience6 131-138. doi:10.1038/nrn1605

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 471 289 4
PDF Downloads 333 212 12