The “grammar” in Universal Grammar: A biolinguistic clarification

Open access

Abstract

This short piece addresses the confusion over terminology that has reigned, and partly still reigns, when it comes to the concept of Universal Grammar (UG). It is argued that whilst there might be changes in terminology and theory, conceptually UG cannot be eliminated. From a biolinguistic perspective, UG is not a hypothesis by any rational epistemological standard, but an axiom. Along these lines, the contemporary evolutionary perspective on the language faculty (FL) is briefly discussed to then argue that UG is necessarily part of FL in both a narrow and broad sense. Ultimately, regardless of terminology, UG is inevitably one of the factors determining the growth of FL.

Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. W. (2000). The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology, 62(1), 697-722. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.697

Ayoun, D. (2005). Parameter setting in language acquisition. London, England: Continuum. (Original work published 2003)

Benítez-Burraco, A., Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G. and Uriagereka, J. (2008). Also sprach Neanderthalis … Or did she? Biolinguistics, 2(2-3), 225-232.

Boeckx, C. (2009). On the nature of Merge. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, P. Salaburu and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Of minds and language: A Basque encounter with Noam Chomsky (pp. 44-57). Oxford, England: Oxford UP.

Boeckx, C. and Benítez-Burraco, A. (2014). The shape of the human language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(282). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00282

Boeckx, C. and Grohmann, K. K. (2007). The Biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics, 1, 1-8.

Boeckx, C. and Leivada, E. (2014). On the particulars of Universal Grammar: Implications for acquisition. Language Sciences, 46, 189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.004

Boeckx, C. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2005). Language as a natural object—linguistics as a natural science. The Linguistic Review, 22(2-4), 447-466. doi: 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.447

Bolender, J. (2010a). Universal Grammar as more than a programmatic label. Lingua, 120(12), 2661-2663. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.010

Bolender, J. (2010b). The self-organizing social mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N. and Berwick, R. C. (2014). How could language have evolved? PLoS Biology, 12(8), e1001934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., Small, S. L. and Rauschecker, J. P. (2015a). Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: Common computational properties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.008

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Schlesewsky, M., Small, S. L. and Rauschecker, J. P. (2015b). Response to Skeide and Friederici: The myth of the uniquely human ‘direct’ dorsal pathway. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 484-485. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.010

Cantalupo, C. and Hopkins, W. D. (2001). Asymmetric Broca’s area in great apes: A region of the ape brain is uncannily similar to one linked with speech in humans. Nature, 414, 505. doi:10.1038/35107134

Cantalupo, C., Oliver, J., Smith, J., Nir, T., Taglialatela, J. P. and Hopkins, W. D. (2009). The chimpanzee brain shows human-like perisylvian asymmetries in white matter. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(3), 431-438. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06830.x

Chomsky, N. (1967). Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas. Synthese, 17(1), 2-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00485013

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origins, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Chomsky, N. (1988). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures (5th ed.). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris. (Original work published 1981)

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1-22. doi:10.1162/0024389052993655

Chomsky, N. (2011a). Language and the cognitive science revolution(s). Lecture conducted from Carleton University. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbjVMq0k3uc

Chomsky, N. (2011b). Language and other cognitive systems: What is special about language? Language Learning and Development, 7(4), 263-278. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.584041

Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33-49. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003

Comrie, B. (1981/1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago UP.

Crain, S. and Thornton, R. (2012). Syntax acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(3), 185-203. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1158

Dehaene, S. and Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56(2), 384-398. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004

Evans, N. and Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 32, 429-492. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X

Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K. and Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(39), 16428-16433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112937108

Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L. and Monaco, A. P. (2003). Deciphering the genetic basis of speech and language disorders, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 26, 57-80. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131144

Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.

Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. and Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications, Cognition, 97(2), 179-210. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005

Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The foundational abstractions. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, P. Salaburu and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Of minds and language: A Basque encounter with Noam Chomsky (pp. 58-73). Oxford, England: Oxford UP.

Graham, S. A. and Fisher, S. E. (2013). Decoding the genetics of speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(1), 43-51. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.006

Greenberg, J. H. (1963/1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language: Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13-15, 1961 (pp. 73-113, 2nd ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hauser, M. D. and Bever, T. (2008). A Biolinguistic agenda. Science, 322(5904), 1057-1059. doi: 10.1126/science.1167437

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569-1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569

Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106-154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837

Irurtzun, A. (2012). The present of UG. Biolinguistics, 6(1),112-123.

Jacob, F. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196(4295), 1161-1166. doi:10.1126/science.860134

Kelly, C., Uddin, L. Q., Shehzad, Z., Margulies, D. S., Castellanos, F. X., Milham, M. P. et al. (2010). Broca’s region: Linking human brain functional connectivity data and non-human primate tracing anatomy studies. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32(3), 383-398. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07279.x

Krause, J., Lalueza-Fox, C., Orlando, L., Enard, W., Green, R. E., Burbano, H. A. et al. (2007). The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Current Biology, 17(21), 1908-1912. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.008

Lasnik, H. and Lohndal, T. (2010). Government-binding/principles and parameters theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(1), 40-50. doi: 10.1002/wcs.35

Levinson, S. C. (2014). Language and Wallace’s problem. Science, 344(6191), 1458-1459. doi:10.1126/science.1252988

Lorenzo, G. and Longa, V. M. (2009). Beyond generative geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view. Lingua, 119(9), 1300-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.003

Ludlow, P. (2011). The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford, England: Oxford UP.

Luef, E. M. and Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2013), Language acquisition: Ontogenetic and phylogenetic considerations. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development, 1(2), 10-28.

Makuuchi, M., Bahlmann, J., Anwander, A. and Friederici, A. D. (2009). Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(20), 8362-8367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810928106

Marcus, G., Marblestone, A. and Dean, T. (2014, October). The atoms of neural computation. Science, 346(6209), 551-552. doi: 10.1126/science.1261661

Martins, P. T. and Boeckx, C. (2015). What we talk about when we talk about biolinguistics. (Unpublished manuscript).

McGilvray, J. (2009), Introduction to Cartesian linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought, by Noam Chomsky (pp. 1-52, 3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141-144. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9

Moro, A. (2008). The boundaries of Babel: The brain and the enigma of impossible languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Büchel, C. and Weiller, C. (2003). Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 774-781. doi: 10.1038/nn1077

Petrides, M., Cadoret, G. and Mackey, S. (2005). Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca’s area. Nature, 435, 1235-1238, doi:10.1038/nature03628

Piantadosi, S. T. and Gibson, E. (2014). Quantitative standards for absolute linguistic universals. Cognitive Science, 38(4), 736-756. doi:10.1111/cogs.12088

Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707-784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061

Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201-236. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004

Poeppel, D. and Embick, D. (2013). Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 103-118). New York, NY: Psychology Press. (Original work published 2005)

Quian Quiroga, R., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C. and Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435, 1102-1107. doi: 10.1038/nature03687

Samuels, B. D., Hauser, M. D. and Boeckx, C. (in press). Looking for UG in animals: A case study in phonology. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford, England: Oxford UP.

Skeide, M. A. and Friederici, A. D. (2015). Response to Bornkessel-Schlesewsky et al.–Towards a nonhuman primate model of language? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(9), 483. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.011

Sklar, R. (1968, September). Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. The Nation, 213-216.

Sterling, P. and Laughlin, S. (2015). Principles of neural design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Theofanopoulou, C. (2015). Brain asymmetry in the white matter making and globularity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1355). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01355

Tomasello, M. (1990). Grammar yes, generative grammar no. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 759-760. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081334

Tomasello, M. (2004). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Studies in Language, 28(3), 642-645. doi:10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom

Tomasello, M. (2005). Beyond formalities: The case of language acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 22(2-4), 183-197. doi:10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.183

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tomasello, M. (2009). Universal Grammar is dead. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 470-471. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990744

Uttal, W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Copp, A. and Mishkin, M. (2005). FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 131-138. doi:10.1038/nrn1605

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 460 296 18
PDF Downloads 317 204 11