Syntactic base positions for adjuncts? Psycholinguistic studies on frame and sentence adverbials

Melanie Störzer 1  and Britta Stolterfoht 2
  • 1 SFB "Bedeutungskonstitution" Universitaet Tuebingen Nauklerstr. 35 72074 Tuebingen
  • 2 Deutsches Seminar Universitaet Tuebingen Wilhelmstr. 50 72074 Tuebingen

Abstract

Syntactic approaches to the positioning of adjuncts (e.g., Frey and Pittner (1998), Maienborn (2001), Frey (2003), Pittner (2004), Steube (2006)) postulate base positions for frame as well as for sentence adverbials above the entire proposition. The question arises how these two adverbial types are positioned in relation to each other. Syntactic accounts respond differently to this question. Furthermore, the role of semantic and pragmatic factors for the positioning of adverbials is disputable. The current paper presents the results of two psycholinguistic experiments that provide evidence for a base position account of frame and sentence adverbials. Furthermore, a non-syntactic factor - namely the referentiality of frame adverbials - is shown to influence position preferences.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alexiadou, A. (1997). Adverb placement - A case study in antisymmetric syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Bader, M., Meng, M., Bayer, J. and Hopf, J.-M. (2000). Syntaktische Funktions-Ambiguitäten im Deutschen - Ein Überblick. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 19, 34-102.

  • Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25-55). New York: Academic Press.

  • Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP.

  • Ernst, T. (2002). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Frey, W. (2000). Über die syntaktische Position der Satztopiks im Deutschen. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 20, 137-172.

  • Frey, W. (2003). Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn and C.

  • Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Modifying adjuncts (pp. 163-209). Berlin-New York: de Gruyter.

  • Frey, W. (2004). A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198, 153-190.

  • Frey, W. and Pittner, K. (1998). Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176, 489-534.

  • Haider, H. (2000). Adverb placement, convergence of structure and licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26, 95-134.

  • Haider, H. (2012). Symmetry breaking in syntax (Chapter 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hetland, J. (1992). Satzadverbien im Fokus. Tübingen: Narr.

  • Jacobs, J. (2001). The dimensions of topic-comment. Linguistics 39, 641-681.

  • Krifka, M. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. In C. Fery and M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure 6 (pp. 13-56). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.

  • Krifka, M. (2008). What do contrastive topics and frame setters have in common? The role of addressing and delimitation in information structure. (Handout) Conference CISA Wuppertal.

  • Lang, E. (1979). Zum Status von Satzadverbialen. Slovo a Slovesnost 40, 200-213.

  • Lüdtke, J., Friedrich, C. K., De Filippis, M. and Kaup, B. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(8), 1355-1370.

  • Maienborn, C. (2001). On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 9(2), 191-240.

  • Maienborn, C. (2003). Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag (studia grammatica 56).

  • Meng, M., Bader, M. and Bayer, J. (1999). Die Verarbeitung von Subjekt-Objekt Ambiguitäten im Kontext. In I. Wachsmuth and B. Jung (Eds.), Proceedings der 4.

  • Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft (pp. 244-249). Sankt Augustin: Infix Verlag.

  • Neeleman, A. (1994). Scrambling as a d-structure phenomenon. In N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Studies on scrambling - Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena (pp. 387-429). Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Pittner, K. (2004). Where syntax and semantics meet. Adverbial positions in the German middle field. In J. Austin, S. Engelberg & G. Rauh (Eds.), Adverbials. The interplay between meaning, context, and syntactic structure (pp. 253-287). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27, 53-94.

  • Steube, A. (2006). The influence of operators on the interpretation of DPs and PPs in German information structure. In S. Winkler and V. Molnár (Eds.), The architecture of focus (pp. 489-516). Berlin-New York: de Gruyter.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search