Reasons for Non-appearance on Organized Cervical Screening in Hungary


The occurrence of cervix cancer is outstandingly high in Zala County, which is situated in the Western Transdanubian region of Hungary. The aim of our study was to reveal why women do not take the opportunity offered by the state and what reasons there are for the nonattendance at screenings. A total of 1000 Hungarian women aged 15 to 60 years were included in the sample. The results of our study revealed that 13.8% of women participating in our research program have never been to a gynaecological cancer screening. Concerning this fact, the following groups deserve greater attention: 15-19 years old, those only with basic school qualifications, the unmarried and the unemployed. To improve our national mortality indexes, it is necessary to continue the cancer screenings in a well motivated target population. Achieving this in cervix cancer screening, there are available conception and infrastructure alike provided by the health administration. The weakness of the system is the low participation rate of the population.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Antilla, A., von Karsa, L., Aasmaa, A., Fender, M., Patnick, J., Rebolj, M., Nicula, F., Vass, L., Valerianova, Z., Voti, L., Sauvaget, C., & Ronco, G. (2009.a). Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe. European Journal of Cancer, 45 (15), 2649-2658.

  • Antilla, A., & Ronco, G. (2009.b.). Working Group On The Registration and Monitoring of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes in the European Union; within the European Network for Information on Cancer (EUNICE). Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union. European Journal of Cancer, 45 (15), 2685-2708.

  • Gakidou, E., Nordhagen, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2008). Coverage of Cervical Cancer Screening in 57 Countries: Low Average Levels and Large Inequalities. PLoS Medicine, 5 (6), 863-868.

  • Karamánné Pakai, A., & Oláh, A. (2015). A theoretical overview of scientific research. In Ács. P. (Ed.), Data analysis in practice (pp. 11-34). Pécs: University of Pécs, Faculty of Health Sciences.

  • Kopp, M., & Kovács, M.E.(ed) (2006). A magyar népesség életminősége az ezredfordulón. Budapest: Semmelweis.

  • Kovács, A., Döbrőssy, L., Budai, A., Boncz, I., & Cornides, A. (2007). The state of the organized cervical screening programme in Hungary in 2006. Orvosi Hetilap, 148 (12), 535-540.

  • Kovács, A., Döbrőssy, L., Budai, A., Boncz, I., & Cornides, Á. (2008). Cervical screening in Hungary: why does the „English model” work but the „Hungarian model” does not? European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 29 (1), 5-9.

  • Karamán Pakai, A., Németh, K., Dér, A., Kriszbacher, I., Mák, E., Mészáros, L., Lampek, K., Oláh, A., & Balázs, P. (2008). Investigating the reasons why Hungarian women avoid organized screening for cervical cancer. Bulletin of Medical Sciences, 81 (4) 271-274.

  • National Audit Office (2008). Jelentés az egyes onkológiai szűrési programokra fordított pénzeszközök hasznosulásának ellenőrzéséről. Budapest: Állami Számvevőszék.

  • Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1999). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw- Hill.

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Pakai, A., Dér, A., Kriszbacher, I., Németh, K., Zsigmond, E., & Balázs, P. (2010). Why don’t Hungarian women take part in organized cervical screening? New Medicine, 1 (14), 27-30.

  • Pakai, A. (2011). A méhnyakrák szűrésen való megjelenés motivációjának a vizsgálata. [PhD Thesis]. Budapest: Semmelweis Egyetem.

  • Pakai A., & Kívés Zs. (2013). Kutatásról ápolóknak. Mintavétel és adatgyűjtési módszerek az egészségtudományi kutatásokban. Nővér, 26 (3), 20-43.

  • Pálfiné Szabó, I., Teknős, M., Oláh, A., Németh, K., & Betlehem, J. (2009). Egészség határok nélkül. Nővér, 22 (1), 13-23.

  • Sándor, J., Brantmüller, É., Bödecs, T., Bálint, L., Szücs, M., & Péntek, E. (2008). The introduction of call-recall method into national cancer screening program organization and the social gradient of participation. Studia Sociologia, 1 (2), 39-62.


Journal + Issues