The anisochrony of a stimulus sequence was manipulated parametrically to investigate whether rhythmic entrainment is stronger in the auditory modality than in the visual modality (Experiment 1), and whether it relies on top-down attention (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, participants had to respond as quickly as possible to a target presented after a sequence of either visual or auditory stimuli. The anisochrony of this sequence was manipulated parametrically, rather than in an all or none fashion; that is, it could range from smaller to larger deviations of the isochrony (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150 and 200 ms). We compared rhythmic entrainment patterns for auditory and visual modalities. Results showed a peak of entrainment for both isochrony and deviations of isochrony up to 50 ms (i.e., participants were equally fast both after the isochronous sequences and after 10, 20 and 50 ms deviations), suggesting that anisochronous sequences can also produce entrainment. Beyond this entrainment window, the reaction times became progressively slower. Surprisingly, no differences were found between the entrainment patterns for auditory and visual rhythms. In Experiment 2, we used a dual-task methodology by adding a working memory n-back task to the procedure of Experiment 1. Results did not show interference of the secondary task in either auditory or visual modalities, with participants showing the same entrainment pattern as in Experiment 1. These results suggest that rhythmic entrainment constitutes a cognitive process that occurs by default (automatically), regardless of the modality in which the stimuli are presented, and independent of top-down attention, to generate behavioural benefits.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., & Schröger, E. (2012). Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.08.003
Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks. Memory and Cognition, 34 (7), 1464–1471. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195911
Cutanda, D., Correa, Á., & Sanabria, D. (2015). Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 790-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039167
de la Rosa, M. D., Sanabria, D., Capizzi, M., & Correa, Á. (2012). Temporal Preparation Driven by Rhythms is Resistant to Working Memory Interference. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00308
Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Synergistic Effect of Combined Temporal and Spatial Expectations on Visual Attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(36), 8259-8266. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1821-05.2005
Fortin, C., & Breton, R. (1995). Temporal interval production and processing in working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206507
Gan, L., Huang, Y., Zhou, L., Qian, C., & Wu, X. (2015). Synchronization to a bouncing ball with a realistic motion trajectory. Scientific Reports, 5, 11974. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11974
Hove, M. J., Fairhurst, M. T., Kotz, S. A., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Synchronizing with auditory and visual rhythms: An fMRI assessment of modality differences and modality appropriateness. NeuroImage, 67, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.032
Hove, M. J., Spivey, M. J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2010). Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1525-1534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019059
Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00458
Korolczuk, I., Burle, B., & Coull, J. T. (2018). The costs and benefits of temporal predictability: impaired inhibition of prepotent responses accompanies increased activation of task-relevant responses. Cognition, 179, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.006
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection. Science, 320(5872), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154735
Lange, K. (2010). Can a regular context induce temporal orienting to a target sound? International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.08.003
Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.199
Marchant, J. L., & Driver, J. (2013). Visual and Audiovisual Effects of Isochronous Timing on Visual Perception and Brain Activity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY), 23(6), 1290-1298. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs095
Mathewson, K. E., Prudhomme, C., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., Lleras, A., & Gratton, G. (2012). Making Waves in the Stream of Consciousness: Entraining Oscillations in EEG Alpha and Fluctuations in Visual Awareness with Rhythmic Visual Stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(12), 2321-2333. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00288
Provasi, J., & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronisation in 2½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250244000290
Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2002). Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1085-1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-15188.8.131.525
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Steinborn, M. B., Langner, R., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1135-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0810-1
Welch, R. B., Dutton Hurt, L. D., & Warren, D. H. (1986). Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(4), 294-300. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204939