Cognitive entrainment to isochronous rhythms is independent of both sensory modality and top-down attention


The anisochrony of a stimulus sequence was manipulated parametrically to investigate whether rhythmic entrainment is stronger in the auditory modality than in the visual modality (Experiment 1), and whether it relies on top-down attention (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, participants had to respond as quickly as possible to a target presented after a sequence of either visual or auditory stimuli. The anisochrony of this sequence was manipulated parametrically, rather than in an all or none fashion; that is, it could range from smaller to larger deviations of the isochrony (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150 and 200 ms). We compared rhythmic entrainment patterns for auditory and visual modalities. Results showed a peak of entrainment for both isochrony and deviations of isochrony up to 50 ms (i.e., participants were equally fast both after the isochronous sequences and after 10, 20 and 50 ms deviations), suggesting that anisochronous sequences can also produce entrainment. Beyond this entrainment window, the reaction times became progressively slower. Surprisingly, no differences were found between the entrainment patterns for auditory and visual rhythms. In Experiment 2, we used a dual-task methodology by adding a working memory n-back task to the procedure of Experiment 1. Results did not show interference of the secondary task in either auditory or visual modalities, with participants showing the same entrainment pattern as in Experiment 1. These results suggest that rhythmic entrainment constitutes a cognitive process that occurs by default (automatically), regardless of the modality in which the stimuli are presented, and independent of top-down attention, to generate behavioural benefits.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arnal, L. H., & Giraud, A.L. (2012). Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 390-398.

  • Barnes, R., & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, Attention, and Time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(3), 254-311.

  • Bégel, V., Benoit, C.E., Correa, A., Cutanda, D., Kotz, S. A., & Dalla Bella, S. (2017). “Lost in time” but still moving to the beat. Neuropsychologia, 94, 129–138.

  • Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., & Schröger, E. (2012). Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 120-131.

  • Brown, S. W. (2006). Timing and executive function: Bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks. Memory and Cognition, 34 (7), 1464–1471.

  • Capizzi, M., Sanabria, D., & Correa, Á. (2012). Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation. Cognition, 123(2), 293-302.

  • Correa, Á., Cona, G., Arbula, S., Vallesi, A., & Bisiacchi, P. (2014). Neural dissociation of automatic and controlled temporal preparation by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 65, 131–136.

  • Correa, Á., & Nobre, A. C. (2008). Neural Modulation by Regularity and Passage of Time. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100(3), 1649-1655.

  • Correa, Á., Triviño, M., Pérez-Dueñas, C., Acosta, A. & Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity. Brain and Cognition, 73, 222-228.

  • Cutanda, D., Correa, Á., & Sanabria, D. (2015). Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 790-797.

  • de la Rosa, M. D., Sanabria, D., Capizzi, M., & Correa, Á. (2012). Temporal Preparation Driven by Rhythms is Resistant to Working Memory Interference. Frontiers in Psychology, 3.

  • Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., & Nobre, A. C. (2005). Synergistic Effect of Combined Temporal and Spatial Expectations on Visual Attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(36), 8259-8266.

  • Fortin, C., & Breton, R. (1995). Temporal interval production and processing in working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 203–215.

  • Gan, L., Huang, Y., Zhou, L., Qian, C., & Wu, X. (2015). Synchronization to a bouncing ball with a realistic motion trajectory. Scientific Reports, 5, 11974.

  • Glenberg, A. M., & Jona, M. (1991). Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects. Memory & Cognition, 19(5), 514-522.

  • Grahn, J. A. (2012). See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms. Experimental Brain Research, 220(1), 51-61.

  • Guttman, S. E., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2005). Hearing What the Eyes See. Psychological science, 16(3), 228-235.

  • Hove, M. J., Fairhurst, M. T., Kotz, S. A., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Synchronizing with auditory and visual rhythms: An fMRI assessment of modality differences and modality appropriateness. NeuroImage, 67, 313-321.

  • Hove, M. J., Spivey, M. J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2010). Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1525-1534.

  • Iversen, J. R., Patel, A. D., Nicodemus, B., & Emmorey, K. (2015). Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals. Cognition, 134, 232-244.

  • Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal Aspects of Stimulus-Driven Attending in Dynamic Arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313-319.

  • Korolczuk, I., Burle, B., & Coull, J. T. (2018). The costs and benefits of temporal predictability: impaired inhibition of prepotent responses accompanies increased activation of task-relevant responses. Cognition, 179, 102-110.

  • Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008). Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection. Science, 320(5872), 110-113.

  • Lange, K. (2010). Can a regular context induce temporal orienting to a target sound? International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 231-238.

  • Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189–207.

  • MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 126-135.

  • Marchant, J. L., & Driver, J. (2013). Visual and Audiovisual Effects of Isochronous Timing on Visual Perception and Brain Activity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY), 23(6), 1290-1298.

  • Mathewson, K. E., Prudhomme, C., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., Lleras, A., & Gratton, G. (2012). Making Waves in the Stream of Consciousness: Entraining Oscillations in EEG Alpha and Fluctuations in Visual Awareness with Rhythmic Visual Stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(12), 2321-2333.

  • Nobre, A., Correa, A., & Coull, J. (2007). The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(4), 465-470.

  • Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2018). Anticipated moments: temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(1), 34–48.

  • Provasi, J., & Bobin-Bègue, A. (2003). Spontaneous motor tempo and rhythmical synchronisation in 2½- and 4-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(3), 220-231.

  • Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2002). Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1085-1099.

  • Rohenkohl, G., Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (2011). Behavioural Dissociation between Exogenous and Endogenous Temporal Orienting of Attention. PLoS ONE, 6(1).

  • Sanabria, D., Capizzi, M., & Correa, Á. (2011). Rhythms that speed you up. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37(1), 236-244.

  • Sanabria, D., & Correa, Á. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence of temporal preparation driven by rhythms in audition. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 98-105.

  • Schroeder, C. E., & Lakatos, P. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 9-18.

  • Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.

  • Steinborn, M. B., Langner, R., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm. Psychological Research, 81(6), 1135-1151.

  • Welch, R. B., Dutton Hurt, L. D., & Warren, D. H. (1986). Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(4), 294-300.


Journal + Issues