Principal Component Analysis of Some Quantitative and Qualitative Traits in Iranian Spinach Landraces

Open access

Abstract

Landraces of spinach in Iran have not been sufficiently characterised for their morpho-agronomic traits. Such characterisation would be helpful in the development of new genetically improved cultivars. In this study 54 spinach accessions collected from the major spinach growing areas of Iran were evaluated to determine their phenotypic diversity profile of spinach genotypes on the basis of 10 quantitative and 9 qualitative morpho-agronomic traits. High coefficients of variation were recorded in some quantitative traits (dry yield and leaf area) and all of the qualitative traits. Using principal component analysis, the first four principal components with eigen-values more than 1 contributed 87% of the variability among accessions for quantitative traits, whereas the first four principal components with eigen-values more than 0.8 contributed 79% of the variability among accessions for qualitative traits. The most important relations observed on the first two principal components were a strong positive association between leaf width and petiole length; between leaf length and leaf numbers in flowering; and among fresh yield, dry yield and petiole diameter; a near zero correlation between days to flowering with leaf width and petiole length. Prickly seeds, high percentage of female plants, smooth leaf texture, high numbers of leaves at flowering, greygreen leaves, erect petiole attitude and long petiole length are important characters for spinach breeding programmes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anonymous (1991). Descriptors for Beta. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources Rome Italy. 37 pp.

  • Anonymous (2010). MINITAB 16. MINITAB User’s Guide. Minitab Inc Harrisburg Pennsylvania. USA. 374 pp.

  • Anonymous (2012). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO STAT data. http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed 17 July 2017).

  • Anonymous (2013). Bioversity International. The International Spinach Database. Centre for Genetic Resources. The Netherlands. Available at: http://documents.plant.wur.nl/cgn/pgr/spinach/ (accessed 30.01.2014).

  • Asadi H. A. Hasandokht M. R. (2007). An evaluation of genetic diversity of Iranian spinach landraces. Iranian J. Horticult. Sci. 38 257–265.

  • Benedictos P. (1999). Characterization and evaluation of spinach germplasm at the genebank. Publication no. 107.12.78335. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII). Karaj. Iran. 8 pp.

  • Dehghani D. Omidi H. Sabaghnia N. (2008). Graphic analysis of trait relations of canola (Brassica napus L.) using biplot method. Agron. J. 100 760–764.

  • Eftekhari S. A. A. Hasandokht M. R. Fatahi-Moghadam M. R. Kashi A. A. K. (2010). Genetic diversity of some Iranian Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) landraces using morphological traits. Iranian J. Horticult. Sci. 41 83–93.

  • Everitt B. S. Dunn G. (2010). Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Wiley. USA. 354 pp.

  • Kawashima L. M. Soares L. M. V. (2003). Mineral profile of raw and cooked leafy vegetables consumed in Southern Brazil. J. Food Compos. Anal. 16 (5) 605–611.

  • Manly B. F. J. (2004). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 224 pp.

  • Morelock T. E. Correll J. C. (2008). Spinach. In: Handbook of Plant Breeding. Prohens J. Nuez F. (eds.). Springer New York pp. 189–218.

  • Sabaghnia N. Dehghani H. Alizadeh B. Moghaddam M. (2011). Yield analysis of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under water-stress conditions using GGE biplot methodology. J. Crop Improvement25 26–45.

  • Spencer N. H. (2013). Essentials of Multivariate Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 186 pp.

  • Vural H. Esiyok D. Duman I. (2000). Vegetable Production. Aegean University Press Bornova Izmir Turkey. 440 pp.

  • Yan W. Rajcan I. (2002). Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42 11–20.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.192

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 456 310 6
PDF Downloads 253 179 6