Software Usability: Concepts, Attributes and Associated Health Problems

Sabīne Grīnberga 1
  • 1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Rīga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, Rīga, LV-1007, Latvia


Digital technologies have opened a large set of opportunities for new electronic services (e-commerce, e-health, e-studies etc.). There are many considerations that need to be made when programmers are building new application software or system software. The software needs to be attractive enough that people want to look at it. It also needs to contain all necessary information that developers want to share with their readers (customers, users) in order to help them achieve the objective for which they came to their website, use their software, or interact with their teaching packages. The oversupply of e-services products has created a need for usability research and development. “Usability means making products and systems easier to use, and matching them more closely to user needs and requirements”. Usability is a key concept of the human-computer interface and is concerned with making computer systems easy to learn and easy to use through a user-centered design process. The in-depth understanding of usability concepts and processes are critical for large-scale acceptance of new e-services and knowledge productivity. Poorly designed software can be extremely annoying to users. Smith and Mayes state that „usability is now recognised as a vital determining factor in the success of any new computer system or computer-based service”. Studies have shown that the main health problems of computer users are repetitive strain injuries, visual discomfort and stress-related disorders. Beside other risk factors, such as poor workstation design, uncomfortable work postures, long hours of computer use every day, stress, etc., also poor design and usability of the computer systems, as well as computer technical problems, add to the pressure felt by the user, which may in turn cause stress-related disorders.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anonymous (2016). Usability organisations’ network. Available at: (accessed 12 April 2015).

  • Aarås, A., Horgen, G., Ro, O. (2000). Work with the visual display unit: Health consequences. Int. J. Human-Comp. Interaction, 12 (1), 107–134.

  • Åborg, C., Sandblad, B., Gulliksen, J., Lif, M. (2003). Integrating work environment considerations into usability evaluation methods: The ADA approach. Interact. Comp., 15 (3), 453–471.

  • Aronsson, G., Dallner, M., Åborg, C. (1994). Winners and losers from computerization: A study of the psychosocial work conditions and health of Swedish state employees. Int. J. Human Comp. Interaction, 6 (1), 17–37.

  • Boivie, I. (2003). Usability and users’ health issues in systems development. Department of Information Technology. IT Licentiate Theses. Uppsala University, Sweden. 10 pp.

  • Bongers, P. M., de Winter, C. R., Kompier, M. A. J., Hildebrandt, V. H. (1993). Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 19 (5), 297–312.

  • Carayon, P. (1995). Effect of computer system performance and other work stressors on strain of office workers. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, July 9–14, Tokyo. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 693–698.

  • Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., Norman, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’88), June 15–19, Washington DC, USA. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 213–218.

  • Guilemette, R. A. (1995). The evaluation of usability in interactive information systems. In: Carey, J. M. (Ed.). Human Factors in Information Systems: Emerging Theoretical Bases. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, pp. 207–221.

  • Hjortskov, N., Blangsted, A. K., Fallentin, N., Ekner, D., Rissén, D., Lundberg, U., Søgaard, K. (2001). The effect of mental and physical stress on the blood pressure response during computer work. In: Sandsjö, L., Kadefors, R. (eds). Prevention of Muscle Disorders in Computer Users. 2nd Procid Symposium: Prevention of Muscle Disorders in Operation of Computer Input Devices. National Institute for Working Life/West. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 205–209.

  • Jirgensons, M. (2012). Towards usability integration into e-learning design. In: Society, Integration, Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Part I: School Pedagogy, University Pedagogy, Life-long Education. 25–26 May 2012, Rēzekne, Latvia [Sabiedrība, integrācija, izglītība. Starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences materiāli. I daļa: Skolas pedagoģija, Augstskolu pedagoģija, Mūžizglītība. 2012. gada 25.–26. maijs, Rēzekne]. Rēzekne, pp. 291–302.

  • Leino, T., Ristimäki, T., Huuhtanen, P. (1999). Computer usability problems and psychological well-being. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, Munich, Germany, 22–26 August. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, pp. 11–14.

  • Lindgaard, G. (1994). Usability Testing and System Evaluation: A Guide for Designing Useful Computer Systems. Chapman & Hall, London. 387 pp.

  • Madan, A., Dabey, S. K. (2012). Usability evaluation methods: A literature review. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Techn., 04 (2), 590–599.

  • Melin, B., Rissén, D., Sandsjö, L., Dohns, I., Lundberg, U. (2001). Psychosocial factors, stress reactions and musculoskeletal disorders among female cashiers before and after a work reorganisation; Prevention of muscle disorders in computer users: scientific basis and recommendations. The 2nd PROCID Symposium: Prevention of Muscle Disorders in Computer Users: Scientific Basis and Recommendations. Kadefors, R, Sandsjö, L. National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, pp. 215–218.

  • Nielsen, J. (1990). Designing User Interfaces for International Use (Advances in Human Factors/Ergonomics). North Holland. 244 pp.

  • Norman, K. (2005). Call centre work: characteristics, physical, and psychosocial exposure, and health related outcomes. Doctoral Thesis. National Institute for Working Life, Linköping University, Sweden. 58 pp.

  • Norman, K., Floderus, B., Hagman, M., Toomingas, A., Tornqvist, E. W. (2008). Musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work exposures at call centre companies in Sweden. Work, 30 (2), 201–214.

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S., Carey, T. (1994). Human-Computer Interaction: Concepts and Design. Addison Wesley, 775 pp.

  • Reed, S. (1992). Who defines usability? You do! PC/Computing, 5 (12). 220–232.

  • Shackel, B. (1991). Usability: Context, framework, design and evaluation. In: Shackel, B., Richardson, S. (eds.). Human Factors for Informatics Usability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–38.

  • Smith, C., Mayes, T. (1996). Telematics Applications for Education and Training: Usability Guide. Commission of the European Communities, DGXIII 3/c, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. 2 pp.

  • Smith, M. J. (1997). Psychosocial aspects of working with video display terminals (VDTs) and employee physical and mental health. Ergonomics, 40 (1), 1002–1015.

  • Wigaeus Tornqvist, E., Karlkvist, L., Hagberg, M., Hagman, M., Hansson Risberg, E., Isaksson, A., Toomingas, A. (2001). Working conditions and musculoskeletal complaints in computer users. In: Sandsjö, L., Kadefors, R. (eds.). Prevention of Muscle Disorders in Computer Users. 2nd Procid symposium (Prevention of Muscle Disorders in Operation of Computer Input Devices). National Institute for Working Life/West. Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 12–17.


Journal + Issues