Ambulatory Anaesthesia/ Anestēzija Ambulatorajā Ķirurģija

Open access

Abstract

Ambulatory (outpatient) surgery refers to the admittance into hospital on the day of surgery of carefully selected and prepared patients for a planned surgical procedure and their discharge within hours. About 65% of all surgical procedures are performed on an outpatient basis. There are many benefits of ambulatory surgery: cost reduction up to 25-75%, efficiency, shorter waiting lists, lower cancellation rate, patient convenience, low morbidity/mortality, less infections and respiratory complications and less medication. All patients should follow a sequential pathway and be pre-assessed according to a set of ambulatory case criteria (health status, age, complexity of surgery, transport, and social support). An anaesthesia plan is developed by an anaesthesiologist, then accepted by the patient after discussion and documented. Anaesthetic management includes the usage of local anaesthetic or short-acting general anaesthetic drugs with fewer residual psychomotor effects and low incidence of postoperative malaise. Medical discharge criteria as well as the discharge organisation are also important. The readmission rate after outpatient surgery is about 1%. Nausea/vomiting, pain and operative site bleeding are the most common causes. Extended stay or inpatient facilities should be available for patients who cannot be discharged after a reasonable stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit areas

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allman K. G. Wilson I. H. (eds.) (2011). Oxford Handbook of Anaesthesia 3rd edition. OXFORD University Press 666-671 pp.

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists. Standards Guidelines Statements and Other Documents: http://www.asahq.org/For-Members/Clinical-Information/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx (accessed 10 November 2014).

  • Anonymous (2007). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) UK: www.nice.org.uk./patientsafety. Technical patient safety solutions for medicines reconciliation on admission of adults to hospital (PSG001).

  • Anonymous (2011). Standards for basic anaesthetic monitoring (ASA). Committee of Origin: Standards and Practice Parameters (approved by the ASA House of Delegates on 21 October 1986 last amended on 20 October 2010 with an effective date of 1 July 2011).

  • Anonymous (2013a). Guidelines for ambulatory anaesthesia and surgery (ASA). Committee of Origin: Ambulatory Surgical Care (approved by the ASA House of Delegates on 15 October 2003 last amended on 22 October 2008 and reaffirmed on 16 October 2013).

  • Anonymous (2013b). Outcome indicators for office-based and ambulatory surgery. Committee of Origin: Ambulatory Surgical Care (approved by the ASA House of Delegates on 16 October 2013) This document has been developed by the ASA Committee on Ambulatory Surgical Care and the Task Force on Office-Based Anaesthesia (April 2003).

  • Antangana R. Eyanga V. C. Bahabeck J. Abolo M. Sosso M. (2005). Evaluation de l’inconfort des patients opere sous anaesthesie locoregionale. AFAR (Annales Françaises d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation) 24 (9) 1189-90 (in French).

  • Bonnet F. Lambert N. (eds.) (2006). Anaesthesiologie. 2nd edn. Paris: Medicine-Sciences Flammarion. 649 pp. (at pp. 556-560) (in French).

  • Brown Z. E. Montgomery J. E. Stocker M. E. (2013). A comparison of the anaesthetic costs of day case surgery: Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia and volatile anaesthesia. J. One Day Surg. 23 (1) 25-28.

  • Cavallini M. Baruffaldi Preis F. W. Casati A. (2005). Effects of mild hypothermia on blood coagulation in patients undergoing elective plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 116 (1) 316-321.

  • Chacon G. E. Viehweg T. L. Ganzberg S. I. (2004). Management of the obese patient undergoing office-based oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 62 (1) 88-93.

  • Dexter F. Maxbauer T. Stout C. Archbold L. Epstein R. H. (2014). Relative influence on total cancelled operating room time from patients who are inpatients or outpatients preoperatively. Anesth. Analg. 118 (5) 1072-1080.

  • Eikaas H. Raeder J. (2009). Total intravenous anaesthesia techniques for ambulatory surgery. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 22 725-729.

  • Fleisher L. A. (2009). Cardiac risk stratification for noncardiac surgery: Update from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2007 guidelines. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 76 (4S) S9-S15.

  • Fleisher L. A. Pasternak L. R. Lyles A. (2007). A novel index of elevated risk of inpatient hospital admission immediately following outpatient surgery. Arch. Surg. 142 (3) 263-268.

  • Friedman Z. Chung F. Wong D. T. (2004). Ambulatory surgery adult patient selection criteria: A survey of Canadian anaesthesiologists. Can. J. Anaesth. 51 (5) 437-443.

  • Gan T. J. Diemunsch P. Habib A. S. Kovac A. Kranke P. Meyer T. A. Watcha M. Chung F. Angus S. Apfel C. C. Bergese S. D. Candiotti K. A. Chan M. T. Davis P. J. Hooper V. D. Lagoo-Deenadayalan S. Myles P. Nezat G. Philip B. K. Tramèr M. R. (2013). Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth. Analg. 118 (3) 689.

  • Gordon N. A. Koch M. E. (2006). Duration of anaesthesia as an indicator of morbidity and mortality in office-based facial plastic surgery: A review of 1200 consecutive cases. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 8 (1) 47-53.

  • Haeck P. C. Swanson J. A. Iverson R. E. Schechter L. S. Singer R. Basu C. B. Damitz L. A. Glasberg S. B. Glassman L. S. McGuire M. F. ASPS Patient Safety Committee. (2009). Evidence-based patient safety advisory: Patient selection and procedures in ambulatory surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 124 (4S) 6S-S27.

  • Joshi G. P. Ahmad S. Riad W. Eckert S. Chung F. (2013). Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Anesth. Analg. 117 (5) 1082-1091.

  • Junger A. Hartmann B. Benson M. Schindler E. Dietrich G. Jost A. Béye-Basse A. Hempelmannn G. (2001). The use of an anaesthesia information management system for prediction of antiemetic rescue treatment at the postanaesthesia care unit. Anesth. Analg. 92 (5) 1203-1209.

  • Junger A. Klasen J. Benson M. Sciuk G. Hartmann B. Sticher J. Hempelmann G. (2001). Factors determining length of stay of surgical day-case patients. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 18 (5) 314-321.

  • Keyes G. R. Singer R. Iverson R. E. McGuire M. Yates J. Gold A. Thompson D. (2004). Analysis of outpatient surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113 (6) 1760-1770.

  • Kirkorian A. Y. Moore B. L. Siskind J. Marmur E. S. (2007). Perioperative management of anticoagulant therapy during cutaneous surgery: 2005 survey of Mohs surgeons. Dermatol. Surg. 33 (10) 1189-1197.

  • Mandal A. Imran D. McKinnell T. Rao G. S. (2005). Unplanned admissions following ambulatory plastic surgery: A retrospective study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 87 (6) 466-468.

  • Momeni M. Crucitti M. De Kock M. (2007). Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 127 (4) 241-244.

  • Morris D. L. J. Randhawa N. Rowlands T. E. (2012). Finding the bigger picture in preoperative assessment. A patient’s story. J. One Day Surg. 23 (1) 23-24.

  • Robles-Cervantes J. A. Martínez-Molina R. Cárdenas-Camarena L. (2005). Heating infiltration solutions used in tumescent liposuction: Minimizing surgical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg. 116 (4) 1077-1081.

  • Shirakami G. Teratani Y. Fukuda K. (2006). Nocturnal episodic hypoxemia after ambulatory breast cancer surgery: Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia. J. Anesth. 20 (2) 78-85.

  • Shirakami G. Teratani Y. Namba T. Hirakata H. Tazuke-Nishimura M. Fukuda K. (2005). Delayed discharge and acceptability of ambulatory surgery in adult outpatients receiving general anaesthesia. J. Anesth. 19 (2) 93-101.

  • Smith I. Kranke P. Murat I. Smith A. F. O’Sullivan G. S¸reide E. Spies C. in’t Veld B. (2011). Perioperative Fasting in Adults and Children: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 28 556-569.

  • Souron V. (2003). Systemes pour l’analgesie continue par catheter nerveux a domicile. Prat. Anesth. Reanim. 7 (4) 281-283 (in French).

  • Szalat A. Erez G. Leitersdorf E. (2007). Aspirin withdrawal prior to invasive medical procedures: A strategy based on thromboembolic and bleeding risk stratification. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 9 (6) 435-438.

  • Tham C. Koh K. F. (2002). Unanticipated admission after day surgery. Singapore Med. J. 43 (10) 522-526.

  • Ting B. Zurakowski D. Herder L. Wagner K. Appleton P. Rodriguez E. K. (2014). Preinjury ambulatory status is associated with 1-year mortality following lateral compression Type I fractures in the geriatric population older than 80 years. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 76 (5) 1306-1309.

  • Twersky R. S. Philip B. K. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of Ambulatory Anaesthesia 2nd edn. Springer LLC. 484 pp. (at pp. 1-24).

  • Warner M. A. Shields S. E. Chute C. G. (1993). Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anaesthesia. JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) 270 (12) 1437-1441.

  • Website of the British Association of Day Case Surgery: www.bads.co.uk (accessed 10 November 2014).

  • Website of the US Society of Ambulatory Anaesthesia: www.sambahq.org (accessed 10 November 2014).

  • Wilton C. Levine M. D. Allain R. M. Alston T. A. Dunn P. F. Kwo J. Rosow C. E. (eds.) (2010). Clinical Anaesthesia Procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital: Department of Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School 8th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 728 pp (at pp. 457-478).

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.192

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 485 307 3
PDF Downloads 335 240 2