Peat Humic Substances and Earthworm Biohumus Extracts for Agricultural Applications

Open access

Extracts for agricultural use were prepared using cavitation method at 45 oC and at 95 oC from peat and earthworm biohumus. Samples of all studied extracts had similar dry-matter content. Peat humic substances and earthworm biohumus extracts were analysed using UV-Vis, FT-IR, and fluorescence spectrometry. Trace element analysis was performed with atomic absorption spectrometry. Extracts were tested for acidity, conductivity, humic acid concentration, and carboxyl group concentration. Hydrophobicity was assessed using a water-polyethylene glycol twophase system and calculation of the partition coefficient. Total nitrogen and phosphorus concentration was determined. Concentration of the humic substances slightly changed during the heating process. Significant changes in total phosphorus concentration was observed both in earthworm humus and peat extract. Thermal treatment caused decrease of hydrophobicity and lower concentration of organic matter in extracts, while carboxyl group concentrations in isolated humic substances practically did not change. The calculated ratio from UV-Vis spectra showed significant difference in humification degree of samples.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albrecht R. Petit J. L. Terrom G. Périssol C. (2011). Comparison between UV spectroscopy and nirs to assess humification process during sewage sludge and green wastes co-composting. Biores. Technol.102 (6) 4495-4500.

  • Atiyeh R. M. Lee S. Edwards C. A. Arancon N. Q. Metzger J. D. (2002). The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Biores. Technol. 84 (1) 7-14.

  • Borah M. C. Mahanta P. Kakoty S. K. Saha U. K. Sahasrabudhe A. D. (2007). Study of quality parameters in vermicomposting. Ind. J. Biotechnol.6 410-413.

  • Chen J. Gu B. LeBoeuf E. J. Pan H. Dai S. (2002). Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere48 59-68.

  • Chen Y. Senesi N. Schnitzer M. (1977). Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 41 (2) 352-358.

  • Chin Y. P. Aiken G. and O'Loughlin E. (1994). Molecular weight polydispersity and spectroscopic properties of aquatic humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (11) 1853-1858.

  • García A. C. Berbara R. L. L. Farías L. P. Izquierdo F. G. Hernández O. L. Campos R. H. Castro R. C. (2012). Humic acids of vermicompost as an ecological pathway to increase resistance of rice seedlings to water stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol.11 (13) 3125-3134.

  • Jun-zhang L. Sen L. Xiang-hua Y. (2004). Application of peat to agriculture. Conserv. Util. Min. Res.3 1135-1141.

  • Kïaviòð M. Ðîre J. Eglîte L. (2004) Humic substances and the potential of their use in agriculture. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci. Ser B58 (2) 39-49.

  • Maciak F. Harms H. (1986). The effect of agricultural utilization on the composition and yield of phenolic acids in low peat soils. Plant and Soil94 (2) 171-178.

  • Makkar R. Cameotra S. (2002). An update on the use of unconventional substrates for biosurfactant production and their new applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58 (4) 428-434.

  • Martynenko O. G. Bulavko A. A. Suvorov A. V. Vlasov A. V. Senchuk L. A. Rusakevich M. I. (2012). Obtaining carbon suspensions by the hydromechanical method. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys.85 (3) 501-504.

  • Mohanty A. K. Misra M. Drzal L. T. (2002). Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: Opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J. Polymers Environ.10 (2) 19-26.

  • Nardi S. Pizzeghello D. Muscolo A. Vianello A. (2002). Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem.34 (11) 1527-1536.

  • Peña-Méndez E. M. Havel J. Patoèka J. (2005). Humic substances and compounds of still unknown structure: Applications in agriculture industry environment and biomedicine. J. Appl. Biomed. 3 13-24.

  • Tan K. H. (2005). Soil Sampling Preparation and Analysis. 2nd edn. New York: Taylor & Francis group.

  • Valdrighi M. M. Pera A. Agnolucci M. Frassinetti S. Lunardi D. Vallini G. (1996). Effects of compost-derived humic acids on vegetable biomass production and microbial growth within a plant (Cichoriumintybus)-soil system: A comparative study. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ.58 (2-3) 133-144.

  • Zavarzina A. G. Demin V. V. Nifanteva T. I. Shkinev V. M. Danilova T. V. Spivakov B. Ya. (2002). Extraction of humic acids and their fractions in poly(ethylene glycol)-based aqueous biphasic systems. Anal. Chim. Acta452 95-103.

  • Ziemelis R. (2011). Latvijas patents Nr. 14159.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.3

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.192

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 250 151 2
PDF Downloads 116 81 1