Introduction: Management of degenerative lumbosacral spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is still controversial. Surgery is widely used, as well as non-surgical treatment. Aim: To evaluate the clinical results and functional outcome after operative treatment in Grade II and III lumbar spine spondylolisthesis.
Material and methods: Twelve patients with symptoms and image-confirmed degenerative spondylolisthesis entered the study. Mean patient age was 57 years. Spondylolisthesis Grade II or III, segment L4-L5 or L5-S1 were evaluated. All patients underwent similar protocols. Operative treatment was decompressive laminectomy, posterior one segment fixation, and fusion with autologous bone grafting. Functional outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 10-point scale) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 100-percent scale) after 6 and 12 months.
Results: Patient follow-up was 12 months. Preoperatively, 7 patients had severe disability according to ODI, 4 had moderate disability. VAS measured 6 and 7 points in 6 patients, lowest score of 4 points and the highest score of 9. After 6 months, ODI showed 5 patients had minimal and 7 had moderate disability; 2 patients had 0 points on the VAS, 2 had a score of 1, 4 had a score of 2, highest score of 4 points. Treatment outcome effects after 1 year were 9 patients with minimal disability, 3 with moderate; VAS - 2 patients with O points, 3 with 1 point, 4 with 2 points.
Conclusion: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated surgically showed substantially greater improvement in pain and functional outcome during a period of 1 year.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Matsunaga S Sakou T Morizono Y Masuda A Demirtas A. M. Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine. 1990; 15(11): 1204-1210. PH (1955).
2. Newman P. H. "Spondylolisthesis: its cause and effect". Ann Coll Surg Engl. 1955; 16: 305.
3. Vokshoor A. Spondylolisthesis spondylolysis and spondylosis. eMedicine. Orthopedic Topic 2004 [cited 2011 Februaruy 4]
4. Meyerding H. W. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932; 54: 371-379.
5. White A. A Panjabi M. M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1990: 342-378.
6. Stokes I. A Frymoyer J. W. Segmental motion and instability. Spine. Sep 1987; 12(7): 688-91.
7. Wiltse L. L Newman P. H Macnab I. Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis.Clin Orthop. Jun 1976; (117): 23-9.
8. Möller H Sundin A Hedlund R. Symptoms signs and functional disability in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine 2000 Mar 15; 25(6): 683-9.
9. Radcliff K. E Rihn J Hilibrand A et al. Does the duration of symptoms in patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis affect outcomes?: analysis of the spine outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Dec 1 2011; 36(25): 2197-210.
10. Ikuta K Tono O Oga M. Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis-- minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. Oct 2008; 51(5): 267-71.
11. Yan D. L Pei F. X Li J Soo C. L. Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. Oct 2008; 17(10): 1311-6.
12. Hu S. S Tribus C. B Diab M Ghanayem A. J. Spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis. Instr Course Lect. 2008; 57: 431-45.
13. Majid K Fischgrund J. S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: trends in management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Apr 2008; 16(4): 208-15.
14. Acosta F. L. Jr Ames C. P Chou D. Operative management of adult high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. Apr 2007; 18(2): 249-54.
15. Weinstein J. N Lurie J. D Tosteson T. D Hanscom B Tosteson AN Blood EA et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. May 31 2007; 356(22): 2257-70.
16. Takahashi T Hanakita J Minami M Kitahama Y Kuraishi K Watanabe M et al. Clinical outcomes and adverse events following transforaminal interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011; 51(12): 829-35.
17. Tosteson A. N Tosteson T. D Lurie J. D et al. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis degenerative spondylolisthesis and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Nov 15 2011; 36(24): 2061-8
18. Dean C. L Gabriel J. P Cassinelli E. H Bolesta M. J Bohlman H. H. Degenerative spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine: analysis of 58 patients treated with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine J. Dec 24 2008.
19. Harris E. B Sayadipour A Massey P Duplantier N. L Anderson D. G. Mini-open versus open decompression and fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). Dec 2011; 40(12): E257-61.
20. Schaeren S Broger I Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine. Aug 15 2008; 33(18): E636-42.
21. Zdeblick T. A. A prospective randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results. Spine. Jun 15 1993; 18(8): 983-91.
22. Zdeblick T. A. The treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders. A critical review of the literature. Spine. Dec 15 1995; 20(24 Suppl): 126S-137S.
23. Herkowitz H. N Kurz L. T. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1991; 73(6): 802-8.