Evaluation of Changes in Serum Concentration of Sodium in a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate/ Евалуација На Промените Во Серумската Концентрација На Натриум При Трансуретралнa Ресекција На Простатa

Open access


Introduction and objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in serum electrolytes during Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and to evaluate the degree of correlation of hyponatremia and the factors that affect the incidence of TURP syndrome and to show the impact of the duration of the procedure on the severity of hyponatremia due to absorption of irrigation fluid in the systemic circulation.

Materials and Methods: This study examined 60 male patients planned for elective TURP. The level of serum electrolytes are determined by taking venous blood samples preoperatively and Postoperatively and when the duration of the operation was longer than 60 minutes, the level of serum electrolytes was determined intraoperative. The amount of used irrigation fluid, the weight of resection prostate, and duration of surgery, were also followed. Patients were divided in two groups according to the length of the surgical procedure: Group 1 (30- 60 min) and Group 2 (> 60 min).

Results: Statistically significant reduction of serum sodium and the elevation of the potassium level in serum observed postoperatively and was directly proportional to the volume of of the used irrigation fluid, the duration of the procedure and volume of the resected prostate.

Conclusions: To evaluate changes in serum electrolyte during TURP is simple and economical method for the indirect estimation of irrigation fluid absorption into the systemic circulation during TURP and opportunity for early identification of TURP syndrome

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Thorpe A Neal D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Lancet. 2003; 361(9366): 1359-67.

  • 2. Nickel J. C. Inflammation and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(1): 109-15

  • 3. Garraway W. M Collins G. N Lee R. J. High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet. 1991; 338(8765): 469-71.

  • 4. Rassweiler J Teber D Kuntz R Hofman R. Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) - Incidence Management and Prevention. Eur Urol 2006; 50(5): 969-80.

  • 5. Anson K Nawrocki J Buckley J Fowler C Kirby R Lawrence W et al. A multicenter randomized prospective study of endoscopic laser ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology. 1995; 46(3): 305-10.

  • 6. Ali MN. The outcome of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2001; 11(12): 743-6.

  • 7. Rajput M. J Memon A. S Shaikh N. A. Transurethral Resection of Prostate versus Transvesical Approach: Frequency of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence: Two Year Study. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci 2009; 8(2): 139-142.

  • 8. D’Ambrosio D. J Ruth K Horwitz E. M Chen D. Y Pollack A Buyyounouski M. K. Does Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) Affect Outcome in Patients Who Subsequently Develop Prostate Cancer?. Urology. 2008; 71(5): 938-41.

  • 9. Оestring J. E. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: medical and minimally invasive treatment options. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332: 99-110.

  • 10. Hahn R. G. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96: 8-20.

  • 11. Gravenstein D. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome : a review of the pathophysiology and management. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84: 438-46.

  • 12. Okamura K Terai A Nojiri Y Okumura K Saito S Ozawa H et al. Evolution of common clinical path for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2007; 98(1): 3-8.

  • 13. Hawary A Mukhtar K Sinclair A Pearce I. Transurethral resection of the prostate syndrome: almost gone but not forgotten. J Endourol. 2009 Dec; 23(12): 2013-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0129

  • 14. Hurlbert B. J Wingard D. W. Water intoxication after 15 minutes TURP. Anestesiologhy. 1979; 50: 355-356.

  • 15. Hahn R. G. Intravesical pressure during fluid absorption in TURP. Scand Urol Nephrol. 2000; 34: 102-8.

  • 16. Moorthy H. K Philip S. Serum electrolytes in turp syndrome - is the role of potassium under estimated? Indian J Anaesth. 2002; 46(6): 441-444.

  • 17. Shiou Sheng Chen Alex Tong-Long Lin Kuang Kuo Chen Luke S. Chang Hemolysis in Transurethral Resection of the prostate using Distilled Water as the Irrigant. /Chin med assoc. June 2006 Vol. 69 No. 6

  • 18. Schreingraber S Heitmann L Weder W Finsterer U. Are there acid-base changes during TURP? Anesth Analg. 2000; 90: 946-50.

  • 19. Hahn R. G. Fluid and electrolyte dynamics during development of the TURP syndrome. Br J Urol. 1990; 66: 79-84.

  • 20. Ayus J. C Arieff A. I. Glycine-induced hypo-osmolar hyponatremia. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 223-6.

  • 21. Madsen P. O Naber K. G. The importance of the pressure in the prostatic fossa and absorption of irrigating fluid during transuretheral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 1973; 109: 446-52.

  • 22. Dobson P. M Caldicott L. D Gerrish S. P Cole J. R Channer K. S. Changes in hemodynanic variables during transuretheral resection of the prostate: Comparison of general and spinal anesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 72: 267-71.

  • 23. Basnal S Afzal L Mammen K Osahan N. K Abraham J. Transient blindness-An unusal symptom of Transuretheral prostatic resection reaction-A Case report. Indian J Anaesth. 2002; 46: 221-3.

  • 24. Ismail Demirel Ayse B. Ozer M. K. Bayar O. L. Erhan TURP syndrome and severe hyponatremia under general anesthesia. BMJ Case Reports 2012;doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006899

  • 25. Boukata B Sbai H Messaoudi F Lafrayiji Z Bouazzaoui A. E. Kanjaa N. Transurethral Resection of the prostate syndrome: Report of a case. Pan Afr Med J. 2013; 14: 14.

  • 26. Oku S Kadowaki T Uemura T Nishioka H. Early detection of absorption of irrigating fluid during transuretheral resection of the prostate with alcohol gas detector tube. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1993; 84: 374-81.

  • 27. Hammadeh M. Y Madaan S Hines J Philp T. 5-year outcome of a prospective randomized trial to compare transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and standard transurethral resection. Urology. 2003; 61: 1165-71.

  • 28. Charalampos Mamoulakis Dirk T. Ubbink Jean J. de la Rosette. Bipolar versus monopolar Transurethral resection of the prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. European Association of Urology 56 (2009) 798-809.

  • 29. Issa M. M Young M. R Bullock A. R Bouet R Petros J. A. Dilutional Hyponatremia of TURP syndrome : A historical event in the 21st century. Urology. 2004; 64: 298-301.

  • 30. Rassweiler J Schulze M Stock C Teber D de la Rossete J. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Alliet Technol. 2007; 16: 11-21.

  • 31. Starkman J. S Santucci R. A. Comparison of bipolar thransurethral resection of the prostate with standard thransurethral prostatectomy: Shorter Stay earlyier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 69-71.

  • 32. Ho H. S Cheng C. W. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate : A new reference standard? Curr Opion Urol. 2008; 18: 50-5.

  • 33. Issa M. M. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate:bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol. 2008; 22: 1587-95.

  • 34. Reuter M Reuter H. J. Prevention of irrigant absorption during TURP: continuous low-pressure irrigation. Int Urol Nephrol. 1978; 10: 293-30.

  • 35. Agarwal R Emmett M. The post transurethral resection of prostate syndrome - therapeutic proposals.Am J Kidney Dis. 1994; 24: 108-11.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2017: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.177

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 486 86 3
PDF Downloads 157 49 1