Social Constructivism in IR — A Short Success Story?

Open access

Abstract

This article aims to present selected elements of SC’s development in the field of International Relations (IR) theory. It underlines the role played by sociology of knowledge and the transformative moment of the end of the Cold War. The main focus of this article is put on the process of mainstreaming SC in IR. This articles presents a summary, reminding one the fundamental premises of SC and their potential in IR and in social sciences in general. It is especially important today, as we face the situation where “everyone writes, but no one reads anymore” (Bok, 2015).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bok Derek (2015) Higher Education in America. Princeton University Press.

  • Christiansen Thomas Knud Erik Jorgensen and Antje Wiener (1999). “The social construction of Europe” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 528–544

  • Cox Michael (2008) 1989 and why we got it wrong. (Working Paper Series of the Research Network 1989 1) Berlin https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-16282

  • Giddens Anthony (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Guzzini Stefano and A. Leander (eds.) (2006). Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics. New York: Routledge.

  • Hopf Ted (1998) “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”. International Security 23 (1): p. 181–185

  • Keohane Robert (1993). Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge aft er the Cold War”. In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate edited by David A. Baldwin New York: Columbia University Press p. 269–300.

  • Kuhn Thomas S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions [3 ed.]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Latour Bruno (1999). Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

  • Maliniak Daniel Matthew S. Peterson and Michael J. Tierney (2012). TRIP Around the World: Teaching Research and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries. Williamsburg: The College of William and Mary Williamsburg.

  • McCourt David M. (2006). “Practice Theory And Relationalism As The New Constructivism” International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 475–485.

  • Onuf Nicholas (2013). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations New York: Routledge.

  • Reuss-Smit Christian (2005). “Constructivism”. In Theories of International Relations. Burchill S. et al. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Scheff Thomas et al. (2006). Goff man Unbound!: A New Paradigm for Social Science (The Sociological Imagination) Boulder: Paradigm Publishers

  • Walt Stephen M. (1998). “International relations: One world many theories”. Foreign Policy. Issue 110: 29–35.

  • Wendt Alexander. (1995). “Constructing International Politics” International Security 20 (1): 77–81

  • Wendt Alexander. (1999). Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Taylor P. (1996). “Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom”. Educational Studies in Mathematics 31: 151–17.3

  • Zehfuss Maja (2002). Constructivism in International Relations. The Politics of Reality. Cambridge University Press.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 8
PDF Downloads 64 64 11