Digitalization and Political Party Life in Poland – A Study of Selected Communication Habits of Party Members and Elective Representatives

Open access

Abstract

The article discusses the influence of digitalization on the organization of a political party and on its members. It presents an analysis of factors limiting and facilitating the development of a political party connected with the use of digital media. The analyses employ data gathered through quantitative and qualitative research conducted among backbenches, members of parliament and leaders of six Polish political parties. A positive connection has been demonstrated between a party’s age and the mode of using particular media types and communication tools. Also, attention has been paid to the phenomenon of digital divide and the possible means of connectivity to party political activity via new technologies, digital tools and digital media. Party members perceive traditional and direct forms as attractive; however, new parties with younger members clearly expect and practice more online activities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anduiza Eva Laia Jorba and Michael J. Jensen (eds.). (2012). Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Antoszewski Andrzej. (2012). System polityczny RP Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  • Bennett W. Lance Segerberg Alexandra and Curd B. Knüpfer. (2017). The democratic interface: technology political organization and diverging patterns of electoral representation Information Communication & Society 21:11 1655–1680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533.

  • Biezen Ingrid van and Thomas Poguntke. (2014). The Decline of Membership-Based Politics Party Politics 20 no. 2: 205–16 doi:10.1177/1354068813519969.

  • Biezen van Ingrid and Peter Mair Thomas Poguntke. (2012). Going Going ...Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe European Journal of Political Research 51 vol. 1: 24–56.

  • Bimber Bruce and Richard Davis. (2003). Campaigning online: The Internet in US Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chadwick Andrew. (2006). Internet Politics: States Citizens and New Communication Technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chadwick Andrew and Philip N. Howard (eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Internet Politics. New York: Routledge.

  • Chen Peter J. (2013). Australian Politics in a Digital Age. Canberra: The Australian National University Press https://press-files.anu.edu.au/downloads/press/p226601/pdf/book.pdf [downloaded 05.12.2018].

  • Coleman Stephen. (2016). Digital Democracy In The International Encyclopaedia of Political Communication ed. G. Mazzoleni. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell doi:10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc215.

  • Coleman Stephen and Jay G. Blumler. (2012). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory Practice and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dalton Russell J. and Martin P. Wattenberg. (2002). Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Delwiche Aaron and Jennifer Jacobs Henderson eds. (2012). The Participatory Cultures Handbook. New York NY: Routledge.

  • Digital Poland (2014). Operational Programme Digital Poland for 2014–2020https://www.polskacyfrowa.gov.pl/media/10410/POPC_eng_1632015.pdf retrieved 12.03.2019

  • Foot Kirsten A. and Steven M. Schneider. (2006). Web Campaigning. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Gauja Anika and Max Grömping. (2019). The expanding party universe: Patterns of partisan engagement in Australia and the United Kingdom Party Politics Jan. 2019 https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818822251.

  • Gerbaudo Paolo. (2018). The Digital Party: Political Organisation in the Era of Social Media. London: Pluto Press.

  • Gibson Rachel K. and Ian McAllister. (2015). The Web and Election Campaigning. Political Studies vol. 63 pp. 529–547. DOI:10.1111/1467–9248.12107.

  • Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning

  • Gibson Rachel K. (2015). Party change social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning Party Politics 2015 Vol. 21 (2) pp. 183–197.

  • Haag Steffi. (2014). Organizational Inertia as Barrier to Firms’ IT Adoption. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems Savannah conference paper https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/edea/4c6e4cb3daac7dc701cc23ef59737bf89480.pdf [accessed 09.03.2019].

  • Hameleers Michael and Linda Bos Nayla Fawzi Carsten Reinemann Ioannis Andreadis Nicoleta Corbu Christian Schemer Anne Schulz Tamir Shaefer Toril Aalberg Sofia Axelsson Rosa Berganza Cristina Cremonesi Stefan Dahlberg Claes H. de Vreese Agnieszka Hess Evangelia Kartsounidou Dominika Kasprowicz Joerg Matthes Elena Negrea-Busuioc Signe Ringdal Susana Salgado Karen Sander Desirée Schmuck Jesper Stromback Jane Suiter Hajo Boomgaarden Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt and Naama Weiss-Yaniv. (2018). “Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Eff ects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries.” The International Journal of Press/Politics vol. 23 (4) pp. 517–538.

  • Heidar Knut and Jo Saglie. (2003). “Predestined Parties?: Organizational Change in Norwegian Political Parties.” Party Politics vol. 9 no. 2 (March 2003) pp. 219–39.

  • Iosifidis Petros and Mark Wheeler. (2016). Public Spheres and Mediated Social Networks in the Western Context and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Jackson Nigel. (2003). MPs and web technologies: An untapped opportunity? Journal of Public Affairs 3(2): 124–137.

  • Jacobs Kristof and Niels Spierings. (2016). #Social media Parties and Political Inequalities Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Lipiński Artur and Agnieszka Stępińska. (2018). Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media Problems of Post-Communism DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2018.1484667

  • Löfgren Karl and Colin F. Smith. (2003). Political parties and democracy in the information age. In R. Gibson P. Nixon & S. Ward (Eds.) Political Parties and the Internet: Net Gain?. London: Routledge pp. 39–52.

  • Lusoli Wainer and Stephen J. Ward. (2004). Digital rank and file: activists perceptions and use of the Internet. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (4) pp. 453–470.

  • Mair Peter. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. In: MPIfG Working Papers 2009/08 http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp09–8.pdf [accessed 30.11.2018].

  • Margetts Helen Z. (2001). The cyber party: the causes and consequences of organisational innovation in European political parties. A workshop paper at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops Grenoble 6–11 April 2001. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute.

  • Margetts Helen Z. (2006). The Cyber Party In R. Katz and W. Crotty (Eds.) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage pp. 528–535.

  • Margolis Michael and David Resnick. (2000). Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace' Revolution Contemporary American Politics. California: Sage Publication's.

  • Min Seong-Jae. (2010). From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills Political Interest and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7 no. 1: 22–35 DOI: 10.1080/19331680903109402.

  • Pedersen Karina and Jo Saglie (2005). New technology in ageing parties Party Politics vol. 11 (3) pp. 359–377.

  • Polish Central Statistical Office. (2016). Partie polityczne w 2016 roku (in Polish) https://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5490/7/3/1/partie_polityczne_w_2016.pdf Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny retrieved 11.03.2019.

  • Polish Central Statistical Office. (2017). Raport: Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce w 2017 roku (in Polish) https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/nauka-i-technikaspoleczenstwo-informacyjne/spoleczenstwo-informacyjne/spoleczenstwo-informacyjne-w-polsce-w-2017-roku,2,7.html retrieved 10.03.2019.

  • Rosa Monika. (2016). Review #5: A Digital Agenda for Poland: Top 10 Suggestions 4Liberty Review published October 22 2016 http://4liberty.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Monika-Rosa_A-Digital-Agenda-for-Poland-Top-10-Suggestions_Review_5.pdf [accessed 08.03.2019].

  • Scarrow Susan E. (2015). Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Short John and Ederyn Williams Bruce Christie. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.

  • StatCounter. Social Media Stats in Europe – February 2019http://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/europe#monthly-200903–201903 [accessed 12.03.2019].

  • Szczerbiak Aleks. (2008). The birth of a bi-polar party system or a referendum on a polarising government?: The October 2007 Polish parliamentary election Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics vol. 24 (3) pp. 415–443.

  • Tavits Margit. (2013). Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. New York: Cambridge University Press

  • Theory of Digital Divide www.communicationtheory.org/theory-of-digital-divide/ [accessed 15.12.2018]

  • Vaccari Cristian. (2013). Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Ward Stephen and Lusoli Wainer Rachel Gibson. (2002). Virtually participating: A survey of online party members Information Polity 7(4) pp. 199–215.

  • Ward Stephen (2008). Introduction: Parties and Election Campaigning Online: A New Era? in Making a Difference: A Comparative View of the Role of the Internet in Election Politics eds. S. J. Ward D. M. Owen R. Davis and D. Taras Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield pp. 1–13.

  • Wauters Bram. (2018). “Which party members participate in direct political action? A cross-national analysis” International Political Science Review vol. 39(2) pp. 225–241.

  • Zielonka Jan (2018) Kontrrewolucja. Liberalna Europa w odwrocie Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 149 149 26
PDF Downloads 102 102 23