The study was set to examine the differences between religion and religiosity and to explore how communities can be protected against religious violence. The study also intended to investigate the motives and the effect that religious violence has had throughout history. The study employed the qualitative research method whereby the researcher carried out a meta-analysis synthesis of different research findings to make conclusions and implications that could answer the study questions. Using the literature review they conducted, the researchers carried out data collection. As such, the researcher employed the bottom-up approach to identify the problem and the questions along with the investigation framework of what they decided to explore. The findings of the study revealed that religious backgrounds should be the cornerstone to realize the diff erence between religion and religiosity. Religion is of divine origin whereas religiosity is specifically a humanistic approach and a behavioral model. The religious violence phenomenon is formed by interlocking factors such as the interpretation of religious texts which clearly adopt thoughts and heritage full of violence camouflaged by religion. It is recommended that governments use a strong strategy employing the educational system, summits and dialogs to successfully overcome religious violence. The summits on religion should result in starting a dialog that ensures acceptance of the different religions.
Gregg, H. S. (2016). Th ree Theories of Religious Activism and Violence: Social Movements, Fundamentalists, and Apocalyptic Warriors. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28(2), 338–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2014.918879
Meyer, C., Lohr, C., Gronenborn, D., & Alt, K. W. (2015). The massacre mass grave of Schöneck Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(36), 11217–11222. http://www.pnas.org/content/112/36/11217.short
Mirahmadi, H., Ziad, W., Farooq, M., & Lamb, R. (2015). Empowering Pakistan’s civil society to counter global violent extremism. Brookings Paper.
Purwono, U., French, D. C., Eisenberg, N., & Christ, S. (2018). Religiosity and Effortful Control as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in Muslim Indonesian Adolescents: Moderation and Mediation Models. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.
Ramakrishna, K. (2017). The Growth of ISIS Extremism in Southeast Asia: Its Ideological and Cognitive Features—and Possible Policy Responses. New England Journal of Public Policy, 29(1), 6. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol29/iss1/6
Rogers, M. B., Loewenthal, K. M., Lewis, C. A., Amlôt, R., Cinnirella, M., & Ansari, H. (2007). The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), 253–262.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349399
Yelderman, L. A., West, M. P., & Miller, M. K. (2019). Death penalty decision-making: Fundamentalist beliefs and the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24, 103-122. doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12141